Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264.

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 01:05

Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264.

The difference of quality video is edifying.
When I think that some players of Divx want to promote this format, I am disappointed.

Try the version 4.0.301.11 of Sorenson Squeeze + the update; and you will see.
This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps).

Note: Reassure yourselves I made only a test in Mpeg-4.

To soon.

acidsex · 18th March 2005, 02:02

I bought Sorenson Squeeze 4 when it first came out and it was way slow and the quality was horrible. Have they since updated and made quality improvements?

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 02:24

Have you got the options that I specified upstream.

" This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps)".

Because some improvements have brought .

Sirber · 18th March 2005, 02:38

Their GUI always crash

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 02:44

some informations

For the RV10 codec / WMV9 / Quicktime / Mpeg-4 (2 options possilbles Sorenson AVC Pro / Mpeg-4 AVC Pro):

HD 1080 hi 8000kbps
HD 1080 lo 6000kbps
HD 720 hi 5000kbps
HD 720 hi 3000kbps

For The Mpeg 1/2 :

HD 1080 D Theater 25400kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD 1080 HD_ATSC_MAXss 19000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 1080 HI 18000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 1080 Lo 10000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 720 HI 16000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 720 HI 000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 02:47

Sirber, I think that you have a problem.
It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully.

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 02:51

Sorry, I am going to sleep.
Tomorrow.

acidsex · 18th March 2005, 03:27

I just checked their site and I still have the most current version. I did a side by side test in January with Squeeze 4 and Nero AVC and Nero not only won in speed but quality as well.

Sirber · 18th March 2005, 04:22

Quote:

Originally posted by guada 2
Sirber, I think that you have a problem.

Yeah, I come to think that too. Should I terminate my faulty existence?

Andrey · 18th March 2005, 08:40

>>Sorenson AVC Pro
It was slow, low quality...
It seems that nothing changed from that moment.

bond · 18th March 2005, 11:27

Quote:

Originally posted by guada 2
It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully

what do you mean with that?

video · 18th March 2005, 12:32

Quote:

Originally posted by bond
what do you mean with that?

afaik quicktime 7 is available only in OSX codename 'tiger' beta/technical preview editions today.

bond · 18th March 2005, 12:45

Quote:

Originally posted by video
afaik quicktime 7 is available only in OSX codename 'tiger' beta/technical preview editions today.

indeed, but this doesnt tell me what guadas sentence mean!?

SeeMoreDigital · 18th March 2005, 15:07

When I tried the last trial version of Sorenson's AVC codec it was nothing like as good as "any" of Nero's releases...

Cheers

Andrey · 18th March 2005, 20:46

>>guada 2: It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully
>>bond: what do you mean with that?
Just guess. May that Sorenson AVC Pro has the last version no. 7 ?

Who cares, anyway...

acidsex · 18th March 2005, 21:41

Maybe what he is trying to say is that Quicktime 7 will use Sorenson's AVC codec.If so, then Applejust lost the war as the Sorenson code is complete shit.

guada 2 · 18th March 2005, 22:38

Look at acidsex,

* An extract of Shaktale AVI : 1280*688 / 1.17mo / 5sec 20
* Graphic card 9800 pro, Link DVI/HDMI + HDMI cables, Scaler Vigatec + Barco projo

HDTV test
Nero AVC H264: time: 11sec / Size: 5.04mo / 9.80mbps?

Test 1080 HI
Sorenson AVC Pro: time: 8min10 / Size:5.08mo / 8.00mbps

I have restart the test, and I confirm in HD 720i/p or in 1080i/p Sorensons is the best.

If someone have a test that it proves me the opposite, don't hesitate. Thank you

NOTE: I am sorry for the translation, my English is very bad

video · 19th March 2005, 15:51

guada 2 I'm permanenetly failing encoding my test movie trailer. At 92% progress the app simply carshes.... very bad news...

guada 2 · 19th March 2005, 18:48

Hello video,

Have you got Windows GUI self patch or the Sorenson Squeeze v4.0 update crack.

Sirber · 19th March 2005, 20:03

Quote:

6) No warez, cracks, serials or illegally obtained copyrighted content! Links to content of a questionable nature, asking for, offering, or asking for help/helping to process such content in any way or form is not tolerated.

18th March 2005, 01:05	#1 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264. Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264. The difference of quality video is edifying. When I think that some players of Divx want to promote this format, I am disappointed. Try the version 4.0.301.11 of Sorenson Squeeze + the update; and you will see. This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps). Note: Reassure yourselves I made only a test in Mpeg-4. To soon.

18th March 2005, 02:02	#2 \| Link
acidsex Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 492	I bought Sorenson Squeeze 4 when it first came out and it was way slow and the quality was horrible. Have they since updated and made quality improvements? Last edited by acidsex; 18th March 2005 at 02:15.

18th March 2005, 02:38	#4 \| Link
Sirber retired developer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 8,978	Their GUI always crash __________________ Detritus Software

18th March 2005, 15:07	#14 \| Link
SeeMoreDigital Life's clearer in 4K UHD Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Notts, UK Posts: 12,227	When I tried the last trial version of Sorenson's AVC codec it was nothing like as good as "any" of Nero's releases... Cheers __________________ \| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 \| My Network Layout & A/V Gear \|

18th March 2005, 02:24	#3 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Have you got the options that I specified upstream. " This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps)". Because some improvements have brought .

18th March 2005, 02:44	#5 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	some informations For the RV10 codec / WMV9 / Quicktime / Mpeg-4 (2 options possilbles Sorenson AVC Pro / Mpeg-4 AVC Pro): HD 1080 hi 8000kbps HD 1080 lo 6000kbps HD 720 hi 5000kbps HD 720 hi 3000kbps For The Mpeg 1/2 : HD 1080 D Theater 25400kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR HD 1080 HD_ATSC_MAXss 19000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR HD HD 1080 HI 18000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR HD HD 1080 Lo 10000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR HD HD 720 HI 16000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR HD HD 720 HI 000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR

18th March 2005, 02:47	#6 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Sirber, I think that you have a problem. It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully.

18th March 2005, 02:51	#7 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Sorry, I am going to sleep. Tomorrow.

18th March 2005, 03:27	#8 \| Link
acidsex Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 492	I just checked their site and I still have the most current version. I did a side by side test in January with Squeeze 4 and Nero AVC and Nero not only won in speed but quality as well.

18th March 2005, 08:40	#10 \| Link
Andrey Registered User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Riga, Latvia Posts: 186	>>Sorenson AVC Pro It was slow, low quality... It seems that nothing changed from that moment.

18th March 2005, 20:46	#15 \| Link
Andrey Registered User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Riga, Latvia Posts: 186	>>guada 2: It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully >>bond: what do you mean with that? Just guess. May that Sorenson AVC Pro has the last version no. 7 ? Who cares, anyway...

18th March 2005, 21:41	#16 \| Link
acidsex Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 492	Maybe what he is trying to say is that Quicktime 7 will use Sorenson's AVC codec.If so, then Applejust lost the war as the Sorenson code is complete shit.

18th March 2005, 22:38	#17 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Look at acidsex, * An extract of Shaktale AVI : 1280688 / 1.17mo / 5sec 20 Graphic card 9800 pro, Link DVI/HDMI + HDMI cables, Scaler Vigatec + Barco projo HDTV test Nero AVC H264: time: 11sec / Size: 5.04mo / 9.80mbps? Test 1080 HI Sorenson AVC Pro: time: 8min10 / Size:5.08mo / 8.00mbps I have restart the test, and I confirm in HD 720i/p or in 1080i/p Sorensons is the best. If someone have a test that it proves me the opposite, don't hesitate. Thank you NOTE: I am sorry for the translation, my English is very bad

19th March 2005, 15:51	#18 \| Link
video moron Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Budapest, Hungary Posts: 205	guada 2 I'm permanenetly failing encoding my test movie trailer. At 92% progress the app simply carshes.... very bad news...

19th March 2005, 18:48	#19 \| Link
guada 2 Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lyon Posts: 718	Hello video, Have you got Windows GUI self patch or the Sorenson Squeeze v4.0 update crack.