Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Programming and Hacking > Development

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd June 2019, 10:16   #1  |  Link
Jamaika
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 568
Test GCC 9.1.1 vs 10.0.0 date: 2019.06.22

I realize that downloading free software during the holiday period is the period of products not tested. They contain a lot of errors.
http://msystem.waw.pl/x265/mingw-gcc1000-20190622.7z
http://msystem.waw.pl/x265/mingw-gcc911-20190622.7z

Adds codecs and maybe someone will correct the mistakes after the holidays.
https://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/...C4bQKlo6QtAXCQ
Conclusions: GCC 10.0.0 is faster to produce image codecs, but it contains errors.
guetzli_08bit.exe --quality 90 --verbose --keepmetadata --overwrite --suffix image_21447.jpg output1.jpg
Assertion failed: pos == data.size(), file jpeg_data_writer.cc, line 451

brunsli_encode.exe output1.jpg --> don't write file .brn


Test GCC 9.1.0 date: 2019.06.01
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...49#post1875949
Conclusions: The files .exe are larger. This is due to the automatic change of commands when compiling libraries. It is exchanged for:
-m64 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -g -O2 -std=gnu99
https://www.sendspace.com/file/c23wiy

Last edited by Jamaika; 23rd June 2019 at 12:17.
Jamaika is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.