Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
16th October 2012, 01:20 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
Google and Mozilla to create a joint next gen video codec?
here is some discussion on brandon eich's blog (mozilla ceo):
Code:
user: What is happening with Daala and VP9? Have you asked google if they will join forces with you and just make a single codec otherwise we will have the same issue that we had with h.264 vs webm, we need a single next gen video codec. Brendan Eich says: October 15, 2012 at 4:50 pm Daala is a way out still. I’ll let Robert O'Callahan and others respond at greater length. Robert O'Callahan says: October 15, 2012 at 4:57 pm The next-gen free codec issue is being worked on. I don’t want to say much about it here, but we are organizing a group at the IETF to standardize it. Last edited by hajj_3; 16th October 2012 at 01:25. |
16th October 2012, 11:06 | #3 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 957
|
That sounds like quite a challenge if they are going to actively avoid patents. Lets hope the standard they produce is a better quality document than VP8 and that they ask for "public" input before they make the bitstream final.
__________________
x264 log explained || x264 deblocking how-to preset -> tune -> user set options -> fast first pass -> profile -> level Doom10 - Of course it's better, it's one more. |
8th November 2012, 20:32 | #5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 56
|
It looks VP9 may be near to be released: http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=we...s/experimental
|
11th November 2012, 12:41 | #6 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
|
|
16th November 2012, 07:31 | #7 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
17th November 2012, 14:20 | #9 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
the program stop at the line "cloning into libvpx", and nothing is downloaded. Why?
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
17th November 2012, 19:48 | #10 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Quote:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting...#wg-videocodec Note the Google VPnext presentation, Google is likely interested in the standardizing effort, however this is probably a long term solution, VP9 should be completed sooner (just guessing from what I read on the net). To keep updated see also the video-codec WG mailing list: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web.../maillist.html |
||
19th November 2012, 10:09 | #11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Code:
$ git clone http://git.chromium.org/webm/libvpx.git Cloning into 'libvpx'... remote: Counting objects: 27071, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6849/6849), done. remote: Total 27071 (delta 21752), reused 25040 (delta 19929) Receiving objects: 100% (27071/27071), 12.72 MiB | 642 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (21752/21752), done. |
|
20th November 2012, 02:50 | #12 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
20th November 2012, 15:48 | #13 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
https://groups.google.com/a/webmproj...K-E/discussion Last edited by dapperdan; 20th November 2012 at 15:50. Reason: linking a slightly differnt url |
|
23rd November 2012, 15:41 | #14 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
I am not sure if such technical superiority is possible with x264 as a competitor. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|