Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
2nd July 2012, 14:42 | #1401 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
|
Waiting for info...
Quote:
It is July now and still we have not heard from you about the progress of your works over new DiAVC 10-bit version. Could you be so kind and let us know if you plan to implement the code or perhaps you dropped the idea. Regards |
|
4th July 2012, 14:29 | #1402 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Sorry that I cancel the plan to finish the DiAVC 10-bit version. I am working on a new private video coding codec that will be similar performance with the HEVC. I am working on intra-coding currently.
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
6th July 2012, 20:36 | #1404 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
I ever read the xiph's daala and google's on-going vp9. Because I have an entirely new architecture/algorithms, I find it is hard to integrate most of my algorithms into their architecture, so I decide to work out a totally new codec with my algorithms.
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
23rd December 2012, 19:04 | #1405 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 560
|
schweinsz,
I don't think the buy section on your website is working correctly. Paypal says it can't load correctly because the window is in a frame. I guess you could get around this by, not using frames on your website, or opening the buy window inside a new tab/window. |
21st January 2013, 06:14 | #1406 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 180
|
Seriously:
First there is a guy developing a decoder and most people are only blaming him for his "slow decoder", "crappy code" and whatever else. Then they notice they were kinda wrong but never excused themselves. Then neuron2 completely removed DGAVCIndex and published DGAVCIndexDI instead, forcing users to additionally buy a DiAVC Decoder license. Then suddenly both projects are dead but instead of telling interested customers (since both of them sell software licenses) that the project is dead both websites are still the same, offering a license. I know that developing nearly everything yourself can be very boring and exhausting over a long time but if you sell your software you have to support it for at least a year after you sold it to a customer. What would you say when you just bought a license and notice some month later by accident that the software you bought a license for is dead? Why did i "upgrade" from DGAVCIndex to DGAVCIndexDI? Because DGAVCIndex processes ONLY the first file, even if you opened multiple ones and because it's extremely slow. Multi-Threading? 64-Bit? Last edited by Guest; 21st January 2013 at 14:25. Reason: rule 4, no profanity |
21st January 2013, 14:56 | #1407 | Link | ||||
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
I withdrew it because libavcodec became unusable for accurate random access due to regressions and my trouble report was ignored. Additionally the "hall of shame" incident disinclined me to want to work further with people that treated me that way.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
21st January 2013, 15:30 | #1408 | Link | |||||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm currently waiting for a reply from the dev about machine id change but if nothing happens should i inform you? Quote:
I count a project as dead if there is (likely) no further development; that doesn't mean that the latest release doesn't work Quote:
I really don't know if the last working libavcodec offers more or at least the same decoding features as DiAVC 1.2.2 does but keeping the support for it would have been great. Quote:
|
|||||
21st January 2013, 15:58 | #1409 | Link | |||
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
21st January 2013, 19:50 | #1410 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 180
|
Oh, yes, right. I must have overread that one word
And that's not what i request but buying a license and noticing by accident some month later that development of the software has stopped is just annoying. But perhaps there will be an (at least minor) updated version after you merged DGIndex, DGAVCIndex and DGIndexNV into one program - as you indicated in the neuron2.net forum |
21st January 2013, 20:26 | #1411 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Be reasonable! You think merging support for CUVID, libavcodec, and DiAVC would be a minor update?
Anyway, now I think you are being disingenuous, as you stated you initially made a donation to get DGDecNV long ago, so your claim of making a donation for DGAVCDecDI only to find after a month later that I don't intend to develop it further is a fabrication. And for what purpose? As I have told you several times, if you are unhappy then send me your info and I will issue you a refund. Then I will not have to deal further with your silliness. Last edited by Guest; 21st January 2013 at 20:35. |
21st January 2013, 21:07 | #1412 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Wow! Are you serious? Insulting a customer who tried to help you where possible and violating forum rules (Rule #4 to be exact)?! Anyway, this is the wrong place for discussing the problems between us and since you're already a moderator i sadly have to contact doom9. |
|||
21st January 2013, 21:17 | #1413 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
I cannot be held responsible for whether or not DiAVC continues development or not. This is what I mean by your silliness. Why don't you go rag on them? You've had the benefit of my DGDecNV product now for years for a measly $15 and yet here you are ragging on me. I explained the situation to you as clearly and openly as I could but you won't let it go. And why the profanity that I had to remove? You set the tone buddy.
|
21st January 2013, 22:12 | #1414 | Link | |||||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Quote:
I absolutely know that you cannot be held for DiAVC and i know that there is no guarantee that the kind of software like DiAVC, DGIndex, AviSynth, etc. is maintained till the end of the world but you also stopped developing DGAVCIndexDI. First completely removing DGAVCIndex and then stopping development of the replacement. All these three things are connected. Isn't this the main thread of DiAVC? If schweinsz is dead, on vacation or just to busy with developing something else that he doesn't read this and replies - what else should i do? If he doesn't send me the updated license code because his software thinks the machine code changed for no reason (many users have that issue) i'll get him to refund. Perhaps his decoder is nice, perhaps not. I don't know. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
... ... ... And thank you for the refund but you really don't have to do that. I'm using DGIndexNV and i like to keep using it (i could even without rejecting ...) but I'm fair and thus I'm rejecting your refund! Perhaps we just got one's wires crossed and i hope that this post explains it a bit better and that we aren't each others deadly enemy |
|||||
22nd January 2013, 09:41 | #1415 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,752
|
It is indeed a pity that schweinsz decided to be ... "less active" with DiAVC. For any reason he may have. I believe one of them was professionally developing H.265 software. Yes, five.
But if you still prefer (or are stuck to) software-only decoding, there are also still alternative ways. FFMS2 is still being developed, trying to get rid of "insanity" in the multi-threaded decoding. And DirectShow is the last hope anchor, which can be successful if used wisely, carefully tweaking filters and merits to ensure that the graph does nothing else but decoding with optimal quality, especially without unexpected additional filtering. |
22nd January 2013, 12:32 | #1416 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
an3k, the fact that one tool (DGAVCIndex) happened to be released as a Freeware neither gives you any guarantees for future updates nor does it give you any guarantees that such an update would still be available as Freeware. And of course having been a user of one tool (DGAVCIndex) doesn't give you the "right" to use other Payware tools, such as DGDecNV or DGAVCIndexDI, for free. Nobody forced you to buy any of those! You could have continued using DGAVCIndex as-is or you could have used an alternative. Instead you decided to buy DGAVCIndexDI+DiAVC. So what exactly are you complaining about? For what I understand, the existing DGAVCIndexDI still does work with the "compatible" version of DiAVC. Right? So, unless there is a particular problem, what is your concern? You bought a software and it works. I don't think anybody gave you a guarantee for "free lifelong updates" when you bought your DGAVCIndexDI+DiAVC licenses. And that's not unusual at all! For example: If you buy a Microsoft Office today, you get the "current" version and that's it. You might get some "security" updates/fixes now and then for free, but for next "major update" you have to pay again! Or stick with your "old" version...
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 22nd January 2013 at 12:38. |
22nd January 2013, 14:07 | #1417 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Actually, I do offer free lifetime updates, if I create any! I don't guarantee to make any update or future versions of my donation-ware, but if I do they will always be free to existing licensees.
But your point stands, one cannot expect that development must necessarily continue just because a working version is still sold. |
25th January 2013, 04:12 | #1418 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
25th January 2013, 04:15 | #1419 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Well, schweinsz, with all due respect, nothing changed in DGAVCDecDI and then one day things stopped working with one of your new releases. We've discussed this but you were not interested in resolving it, just kept saying nothing changed. This is why I had to stop my development.
Don't you recall writing this to me: "I notice the same problem; perhaps it is because that I change some compiler options of the DiAVC." What ticked me off is that you just started releasing versions that you knew broke backward compatibility without discussing it with me or informing me. That told me you didn't care about DGAVCDecDI. So why should I care about DiAVC? I thought we had a good partnership going and that we could do great things together. Then you started not caring, and I suppose it is because you moved on to your new encoder. Quote:
Last edited by Guest; 25th January 2013 at 04:58. |
|
25th January 2013, 07:59 | #1420 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
"I notice the same problem; perhaps it is because that I change some compiler options of the DiAVC." You should notice the "perhaps". For example, I fix a problem in the GetMachineCode.exe for some computers that it is hard to get their harddisk serial number in recent days.
__________________
The Next Generation Internet Video Codec project.[/url]. |
|
Tags |
avc, diavc, fastest decoder, h.264, software |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|