Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > One click suites for DVD backup and DVD creation
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 31st August 2005, 06:15   #1  |  Link
writersblock29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 618
Impressions of Shrinkto5

I downloaded and tested this new software, (availible at: http://www.shrinkto5.com/) not expecting much since 1-click DVD backup software is becoming more and more mainstream. Here's what I wound up with.

Movie tested: Star Wars Episode 1, Region 1, Disk 1, Full disk copy.

Decrypted with DVDFab Decrypter.

Installation was fast and easy, since the download is a self-contained installer. Uninstalling left no harsh effects on my test system. The test system is a self-built unit meant for video processing, including the following:

AMD Anthlon 64 on an MSI Socket 939 motherboard which is running 2GB of Micron memory (PC3200) in a dual-channel mode. All programs are in a 32-bit environment (due to lack of support for drivers and programs with Windows 64).

The CPU ran at 94-100% all through the 25 minute, 59 second event. The output size was left at default in the program (4.37GB), but the resulting files clocked in at 4.21GB -- bringing back memories of InstantCopy 7. The average encoding speed was 144 FPS, and completed without any input on my part. The interface itself is clean and easy to understand, requiring only four clicks to complete a full-disk project.

The quality is mixed, however. Granted, there's a lot of reduction necessary to whittle the original 7.78GB file to 4.37 -- and any transcoder currently availible is going to show the strain from that. So to that end, I can forgive the degree of pixelation I saw in the final product since even very good software like DVD Shrink or Nero Recode would show roughly the same thing (to be fair about it, I ran a full-disk comparison with Nero Recode). The issue I ran into that made me frown the most was the handling of Multi-angle material -- which this disk has. There was a high degree of stuttering within these scenes, with flickering images of alternate languages here and there. Since this was absent in both the original rip and the Recode project, I can only conclude that Shrinkto5 has issues with this sort of material.

While quality is certainly subjective, I found the Recode files much more pleasing to the eye, while not necessarilly being as sharp. Much, MUCH, less pixelation with Recode.

Not that I mean to discourage the developers, should they read this post. On the contrary: I'd like to see how this software ends up with a little more development and testing. I love it when a free software rivals high-priced "professional" tools! Reversely, however, I conclude that Shrinkto5 is not yet a threat to other transcoders like DVD Shrink or Nero Recode. It certainly won't be embraced by users of high-end encoders like CCE (nor does it have the many functions availible in DVD Rebuilder... which, incidentally, appears to handle Multi-angle sources just fine).

This is just me testing one (count 'em: ONE) movie. The price is right, so feel free to test it yourself. Curriousity's good for you.
__________________
Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice?"
--George Carlin
writersblock29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 09:55   #2  |  Link
ChickenMan
Registered User
 
ChickenMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 350
I found also exactly the same obversations as you did writersblock29. I tried it on an old favorite, The American President. PAL R4 6.72gb, with all bar English removed in Audio & Subs. Took 9min 13sec on my AMD X2 4400 to reduce it down to 4.19gb.

End result showed some major blocking in the Universal intro with random flickering of coloured blocks. The actual movie would be okay to watch on a small screen TV but not on anything larger than a 26" set. On the PC screen the pic was very fuzzy and lots of added noise. Back to ReBuilder, that took me 51min and excellent results
__________________
Cheers,
CM
ChickenMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 19:01   #3  |  Link
mrbass
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,034
thanks for the reports. I'll wait a till the engine improves before trying it myself. If it does get decent it'll be a boon for linux/mac users.
__________________
www.mrbass.org DVDShrink | DVD2DVD | DVDFAB | Mac guides
mrbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 01:31   #4  |  Link
Aquilonious
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was just about to install Shrinkto5 but thought, eh, I better take a look on Doom9 to see if anyone else has tried it. I'm glad I did, because I have enough "junk" installed on this system of mine (certainly not that St5 is junk, but I just don't need it).

I only use DVD Shrink to check the options of the movie I want and then export it uncompressed. From there I use DVD-RB Pro. I still find DVD Shrink to be easier in customizing a movie to my own liking. I don't use it at all for transcoding, even for small percentages (under 10%). I use CCE for my encoding needs, using custom matrices and sometimes undot() and deen() when applicable.

I hope St5 improves at least to the point of DVD Shrink since the latter is no longer hosted (though it's easily obtainable via p2p). St5 has a great interface and much potential. It's especially good for those (like many of my friends) who need something very easy to use with relatively good quality output.

Last edited by Aquilonious; 1st September 2005 at 01:33.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 11:34   #5  |  Link
Cyberace
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 132
What happened to ReJig (C++ open source DVD9 to DVD5 transcoder) by the way? ...anyway maybe ShrinkTo5's developers can integrate ReJig's source code into its own (if there is any features/functions or other stuff in there that they can use )?, it's great that there now is at least one active GPL'ed project/program that does DVD9 to DVD5 ripping simple and quick, (to bad DVDShrink isn't open sourced too )
Cyberace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2005, 09:50   #6  |  Link
Cyberace
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyberace
to bad DVDShrink isn't open sourced too
I just read the news that DVDShrink is no more, ...rumour is that the author got employed by Nero to work on Recode and he took his code with him so DVDShrink will probebely never be open sourced
Cyberace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2006, 13:33   #7  |  Link
n3rdyguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 60
So anyone tried the new version yet ???? Post results ;p
__________________
N3rdyGuy

Starfyrez Community Forum
n3rdyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 08:50   #8  |  Link
emazur
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 88
I'm wanting to try this b/c dvdshrink has obselete ripping and I want an all-in-one freebie, by there are some serious red flags being raised:

1) it is adware. = spyware?

2) it don't decrypt css without machinist2.dll, which is not included.
google won't give ya jack, and the file(s) that appear on shareaza are infested with a trojan horse according to the free antivirus software AntiVir:
http://www.free-av.com/
emazur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 11:47   #9  |  Link
ricardo.santos
Registered User
 
ricardo.santos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 907
you can find the machinist2.dll here

the shrinkto5 website forum says the dll was supplied to doom9.org and others but none hosted it.
ricardo.santos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 12:19   #10  |  Link
emazur
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 88
thanks, that file seems to be virus-free but why the need for an executable setup program for just a freaking dll?
That's a bit unsettling, plus I don't know if the main program is spyware or not. Embedded ads that don't connect to the internet and don't install any other software on the system are within my tolerance (dvdinfo pro seems to take this approach), but if it's about phoning home or installing browser bars or tray apps then screw it.
emazur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 18:59   #11  |  Link
ricardo.santos
Registered User
 
ricardo.santos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 907
if you like me just want to try out its capabilities, theres a 3 day no ads installed version on their website.

none of my anti spyware detectd anything when installing that version.
ricardo.santos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2006, 16:41   #12  |  Link
stoney
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardo.santos
none of my anti spyware detectd anything when installing that version.
It's a no-no for me. Don't like Adware - and the Layout of the program is FUBAR on my Display (1680x1050 large fonts)
stoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.