Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
31st December 2013, 02:36 | #2001 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
https://github.com/DarkShikari/x264-...commits/master |
|
31st December 2013, 07:41 | #2002 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 756
|
The latest newsletter from 30th of Oct.
Quote:
|
|
31st December 2013, 11:18 | #2003 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,783
|
A newsletter or blog entry won't appear with each commit. Probably only when something "revolutionary" happens. Or when silent evolution progressed long enough. Following the commit log is certainly more reliable.
[ NO PANIC ] And not all x264 developers are part of the x265 development too, I believe. |
31st December 2013, 12:03 | #2004 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 552
|
I would say even more. Almost zero x264 developers (I don't know anyone) are part of active x265 developers (which are mostly MulticoreWare workers). This doesn't mean that we don't support/help them to understand and adapt x264 algorithm but that is almost only this.
|
3rd January 2014, 16:49 | #2006 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
See here:
https://www.leffster.se/showthread.php?t=168010 Also, FWIW, the MVC patch can still be found at: http://pastebin.com/qZ1xSmuc
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 3rd January 2014 at 16:52. |
5th January 2014, 20:08 | #2007 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,997
|
Quote:
CoreCodec offerings apply to the MVC Decoder only it appears .... |
|
5th January 2014, 22:46 | #2008 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
31st January 2014, 08:54 | #2009 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,277
|
when using:
Code:
mencoder -lavdopts threads=8 -really-quiet -of rawvideo -o - -ovc raw -vf scale,format=i420,scale,format=444p -forcedsubsonly -nosub -nosound -mc 0 "H:\Temp\encodingTempAvisynthSkript_08_44_17_5010.avs" | x264 --preset ultrafast --tune fastdecode --qp 0 --profile high444 --no-psy --sar 32:27 --non-deterministic --colormatrix bt470bg --input-csp yv24 --fps 30000/1001 --input-res 720x480 --output "H:\Temp\lossless_08_44_17_5010_03.264" - Quote:
Cu Selur Ps.: I used: Code:
x264 0.142.2389 956c8d8 (libswscale 2.5.101) (libavformat 55.25.101) (ffmpegsource 2.17.4.0) built by Komisar on Jan 22 2014, gcc: 4.8.2 (multilib.generic.Komisar) configuration: --bit-depth=8 --chroma-format=all x264 license: GPL version 2 or later libswscale/libavformat/ffmpegsource license: GPL version 2 or later Last edited by Selur; 31st January 2014 at 09:00. |
|
31st January 2014, 09:08 | #2010 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,347
|
You need to set --output-csp, or it'll always encode 420.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
25th February 2014, 22:37 | #2012 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 365
|
Regarding qpfiles, is the 2 following "statements" threated as the same?
"50 K" and "50 K -1" And does qpfiles support comments within the file? with for example a "#" or "//" pre-sign?
__________________
(i have a tendency to drunk post) |
27th February 2014, 10:29 | #2015 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,277
|
Seems like the sample is too short for 10bit rate control to work properly:
Avisynth script used: Code:
SetMemoryMax(768) SetMTMode(6,0) # change MT mode LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\DGDecodeNV.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\TIVTC.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\mt_masktools-26.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\DctFilter.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\deblock.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\MosquitoNR.dll") LoadPlugin("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\flash3kyuu_deband.dll") Import("G:\Hybrid\avisynthPlugins\Deblock_QED.avs") # loading source DGSource(dgi="H:\Temp\1452664460mkv_deb1536f480475f7d593219aa1afd74c_18716.dgi",fieldop=0) RequestLinear(rlim=50,clim=50) # deblocking SetMTMode(2) # change MT mode Deblock_QED(quant1=24,quant2=26,aOff1=1,bOff1=1,aOff2=2,bOff2=2,uv=3) # deringing MosquitoNR(strength=16,restore=128,radius=2,threads=0) # debanding f3kdb(range=15,sample_mode=2,dither_algo=3,grainY=64,grainC=64,dynamic_grain=true,Y=64,Cb=64,Cr=64,blur_first=true,keep_tv_range=false) return last 1st pass: Code:
"G:\Hybrid\x264-10bit.exe" --pass 1 --bitrate 2889 --profile high10 --level 4.1 --direct auto --b-adapt 2 --rc-lookahead 60 --qpmax 81 --deblock -1:-1 --non-deterministic --stats "H:\Temp\DeblockQED, Flash 3k Deband, MosquitoNR_10bit_10_16_58_5710_03.stats" --output-csp i420 --input-res 1280x672 --output NUL - Quote:
Code:
"G:\Hybrid\x264-10bit.exe" --preset slower --tune film --pass 2 --bitrate 2889 --profile high10 --level 4.1 --ref 3 --qpmax 81 --vbv-maxrate 150000 --vbv-bufsize 187500 --non-deterministic --colormatrix bt709 --stats "H:\Temp\DeblockQED, Flash 3k Deband, MosquitoNR_10bit_10_16_58_5710_03.stats" --output-csp i420 --input-res 1280x672 --output "H:\Temp\DeblockQED, Flash 3k Deband, MosquitoNR_10bit_10_16_58_5710_04.264" - Quote:
I used: Code:
x264 0.142.2389kMod 956c8d8 (libswscale 2.5.101) (libavformat 55.25.101) (ffmpegsource 2.17.4.0) built by Komisar on Jan 22 2014, gcc: 4.8.2 (multilib.generic.Komisar) configuration: --bit-depth=10 --chroma-format=all x264 license: GPL version 2 or later libswscale/libavformat/ffmpegsource license: GPL version 2 or later Ps.: I know the clip is really short and mainly contains of black frames, but I thought I should report it since 8bit encoding worked fine and only 10bit encoding fumbled. Last edited by Selur; 27th February 2014 at 10:48. |
||
27th February 2014, 19:30 | #2017 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 552
|
Selur
1) if you going to make bug reports than use clean version of x264 (no patched one). 2) why do you use so different params for 1-st and 2-nd pass? 3) use source directly or provide already filtered source because developers not going to install all needed plugins and scripts only to find out that they can't reproduce your bug. P.S. I can't reproduce it with clean build + your sample without any filtering + your command lines. 2-nd pass gives 2799.90 kb/s here (while 1-st pass gives 16670.55 kb/s). |
27th February 2014, 19:37 | #2018 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,277
|
regarding
1.: used clean build first 2. What parameter do you think has changed? All differences should be due to the normal 'fast 1st pass' adjustments 3. also happened with the filtered source Quote:
|
|
28th February 2014, 11:14 | #2019 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,783
|
You should probably use the same preset and tuning for both 1st and 2nd pass, because you may collect statistics for a different complexity than you intend to encode with. Except you really know that the "fast 1st pass" would reset just the same basic options as omitting the preset and tuning.
|
Tags |
coding, development, x264 dev |
|
|