Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#23 | Link | |
Encoding Dinosaur!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,668
|
@ 2bdecided
Looks better of course, but I don't think that the result is worth the pain. You would have to put 2 screens side by side for me to see the difference, but Bicubic on its own looks sharp enough for me. I would upscale only if I have to. Like if I've got a 512x384 video that I need to get on DVD-Video or something like that. @ Typhoon OK, guess I'm gonna have to show you everything in detail. Here is a side by side comparison: ![]() See how much is missing from your picture on the upper and lower parts? About 96 pixels, that's 20% of the original height! Normally they would crop 25% to get the 16:9 image, but I guess they worked on a slightly bigger image for the remaster (less crop margin), that's why I have a few pixels missing on the left and right sides. By the way, the blu-ray is not an upscale from the DVD, it is true 1080p, but as mutilated as the DVD of course, since the 20% are missing on the blu-ray as well. I invite you to read this review about one of the blu-ray releases. It says: Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|