Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
20th August 2008, 01:35 | #303 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
On the other hand I don't know whether MPlayer or VLC use frame queuing - DirectShow renderers (e.g Haali's Renderer) use queuing, which helps to assure smooth playback. BTW: When testing MPlayer performance, I highly recommend "-vo gl:force-pbo:ati-hack" (the sub-options are very important here!) instead of the default "-vo directx". That's because the OpenGL renderer can be much faster than the DirectX renderer!
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 20th August 2008 at 01:38. |
|
25th August 2008, 00:41 | #304 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 112
|
Will there be discussion at some point regarding the non-video options that will be included in the DivX container specs? Audio types/channels/bitrates, subtitle types, chapters, tags, attachments/thumbnails, menus, that sort of thing? Presumably you'll need to impose some limitations, rather than "anything Matroska can handle", in order to maintain compatibility across the board.
|
26th August 2008, 17:47 | #305 | Link |
CoreCodec Founder
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,421
|
We would like to know that as well especially with the Matroska 2.0 work we are doing now to ensure it is backwards compatible with 1.0.
__________________
Dan "BetaBoy" Marlin Ubiquitous Multimedia Technologies and Developer Tools http://corecodec.com |
26th August 2008, 19:20 | #306 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 936
|
djloewen & Betaboy: Yes, we'll be covering things outside of the video profile a little down the road. We're trying to be pretty open with you guys about the format while at the same time trying to avoid announcing details that run the risk of significant changes. As we work out remaining spec/feature details I'll keep you in the loop.
|
28th August 2008, 14:54 | #307 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 50
|
Can you guys update this wiki table with what features Divx H.264 will implement.
At the very least update the Mainconcept table, since you guys own them Link to the wiki table http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264#S...ure_comparison |
29th August 2008, 09:40 | #308 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 756
|
Matroska, a good thing, but it never has wide adoption apart from us video enthusiast circle.
Now with Divx it may be a chance to make some difference to the world. The question is, how do you pronounce Matroska? One of the thing I HATE MOST is that open source / free software ALWAYS tend to have UNMARKETABLE names. Think Ogg, Vobris, Matroska. May be Divx H.264 file will stick to .divx extension? Last edited by iwod; 29th August 2008 at 09:46. |
29th August 2008, 12:39 | #309 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 50
|
so videos encoded with divx h.264 won't play on itunes, ipod, iphone, ps3 and won't play online under flash or quicktime, cause it has matroska, and not mp4.
thanks for curbing my choices and having me do yet another conversion from matroska to mp4. |
29th August 2008, 14:01 | #310 | Link | |||
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
However I doubt Flash Player + MP4 will disappear from the web that fast... Quote:
Also the new Matroska-based ".divx" files would be completely incompatible to the old AVI-based ".divx" files. This would cause a hell of confusion !!! Quote:
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 29th August 2008 at 14:09. |
|||
29th August 2008, 18:30 | #311 | Link | |
Didée 4 President
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 239
|
does anyone in the DivX team care that Remoulade doesn't give the correct frame rate to Reclock ?
at this point it says 25fps in Reclock, and 0.02fps in ffdshow I know it's legacy software, yet many ppl still use it as it is the only way to get stable frame rate on PC. and CoreAVC/ffdshow work perfectly fine....so why not Remoulade ? it's been tested on many differents computers. maybe something wrong with IMediaSample ? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...91(VS.85).aspx I'm a registered beta-tester of Remoulade if that matters(under the same login) thanks, Quote:
Last edited by pitch.fr; 30th August 2008 at 09:54. |
|
30th August 2008, 17:30 | #312 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
CoreCodec Matroska 2.0 posts moved here as requested:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=140723 Advise in PM if you need a thread title or forum change. |
31st August 2008, 15:31 | #313 | Link |
CoreCodec Founder
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,421
|
thx neuron2
__________________
Dan "BetaBoy" Marlin Ubiquitous Multimedia Technologies and Developer Tools http://corecodec.com |
9th September 2008, 09:14 | #314 | Link |
Didée 4 President
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 239
|
so this is what happens.
Remoulade says "25 fps" in the DS graph for 23.976/24 fps movies : only if I disable "determine frame rate through directshow" in Reclock and force manual frame rate, THEN I can get 23.976 fps in Reclock. this MKV is 23.976, and shows as 23.976 with CoreAVC/ffdshow. any chance for a fix ? Last edited by pitch.fr; 9th September 2008 at 09:33. |
13th September 2008, 10:00 | #315 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 211
|
Just came in:
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
coreavc, divx, h264 decoder, remoulade |
|
|