Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
24th June 2019, 21:15 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 851
|
Which processor to encode x265 4K ?
Hi
I would like to change my old X6 1090T to encode x265 1080p/4K. I know Ryzen 3 will be out soon but I don't know if it would be a good value for money choice. Currently, which processors are good value for money ? Ryzen 7 2700x ? i7 9700k ? Thank you ! |
24th June 2019, 21:43 | #2 | Link |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
|
Have a look here (scroll down to "H.265 Media Encoding").
__________________
Groucho's Avisynth Stuff |
24th June 2019, 23:00 | #6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 328
|
I would say wait and see what happens with Ryzen 3000 series after they are released. You've waited this long to upgrade, so seriously, what's another 2-3 weeks (for PROPER reviews). It is highly possible that with their increased IPC that they might catch Intel for x265. And if not, well the Ryzen 2000 series will be a LOT cheaper by then, as AMD does whatever they can to get rid of old stock, where as Intel likes to keep prices on old stock stupidly high.
|
25th June 2019, 01:17 | #7 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
Actually Intel is expected to reduce the prices of their CPUs by up to 15%. Zen2 is too good for them to ignore this time.
It really is not the right time to get a CPU, 2-3 weeks should offer better CPUs per dollar from both AMD and Intel.
__________________
madVR options explained |
25th June 2019, 07:26 | #8 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 851
|
Yes, you're right both, I'll not buy anything before 2 weeks, but I start to search an alternative if Ryzen 3 are not as good as expected (because if there are discount prices after Ryzen 3 release, I wish to buy immediatly and not thinking if it is a good choice). Now I know 9700K and 2700X are good values.
Thank you ! |
25th June 2019, 11:45 | #9 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
Quote:
2990WX has very low fps because of broken windows scheduler. Just compare those results. Code:
65.0 fps - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-4660 v3 @ 2.9GHz^ ( 14C / 28T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 63.6 fps - Intel Core i9-7920X @ 4.6GHz^ ( 12C / 24T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 54.3 fps - Intel Core i9-7900X @ 4.7GHz^ ( 10C / 20T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 52.5 fps - AMD Threadripper 2990WX @ 3.4GHz ( 32C / 64T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 50.3 fps - AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 4.0GHz^ ( 16C / 32T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 44.6 fps - Intel Core i9-7900X @ 4.0GHz ( 10C / 20T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 43.6 fps - AMD Threadripper 1950X @ 3.4GHz ( 16C / 32T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 36.8 fps - Intel Core i7-8700K @ 5.0GHz^ ( 6C / 12T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 35.3 fps - Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.9GHz^ ( 6C / 12T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 33.9 fps - Intel Core i7-5960X @ 4.4GHz^ ( 8C / 16T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 31.8 fps - Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.3GHz ( 6C / 12T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 29.8 fps - Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3 @ 1.8GHz ( 16C / 32T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 25.5 fps - AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7GHz^ ( 8C / 16T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 24.8 fps - Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.8GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 24.3 fps - AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.5GHz^ ( 8C / 16T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 23.8 fps - Intel Core i5-8400 @ 3.8GHz ( 6C / 6T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 23.7 fps - Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.8GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 23.3 fps - Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.7GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 22.6 fps - Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.5GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 21.6 fps - Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.4GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 20.6 fps - AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.8GHz^ ( 6C / 12T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 18.6 fps - Intel Core i7-6600K @ 4.5GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 16.4 fps - Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.9GHz ( 8C / 16T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 15.8 fps - Intel i7-6770HQ @ 2.6GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 15.8 fps - Intel Core i5-4690K @ 4.2GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 15.6 fps - Intel Xeon E3 1231 v3 @ 3.4GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 14.7 fps - Intel Xeon E5-2670 @ 2.6GHz ( 8C / 16T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 14.7 fps - Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.2GHz ( 6C / 12T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 14.6 fps - AMD Ryzen 5 2400G @ 4.0GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 13.9 fps - Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.5GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 13.8 fps - Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.2GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 13.5 fps - AMD Ryzen 5 1500X @ 3.5GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 13.3 fps - Intel Core i5-4570S @ 3.6GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 12.7 fps - 2 x Intel Xeon X5550 @ 3.0GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.1 Cache64 12.4 fps - AMD Ryzen 5 2200G @ 4.0GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 12.1 fps - AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core @ 4.32GHz^ ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX XOP FMA4 FMA3 LZCNT BMI1 12.0 fps - Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.2GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 11.2 fps - Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.5GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 9.7 fps - Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.9GHz ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 8.8 fps - AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.5GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 8.3 fps - Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.7GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 7.8 fps - Intel i7-3612QM @ 2.1GHz ( 4C / 8T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 7.6 fps - Intel Core i7-7500U @ 3.5GHz^ ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 6.1 fps - Intel Celeron G3900 @ 4.0GHz^ ( 2C / 2T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 LZCNT 5.9 fps - AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core @ 4.5GHz^ ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX XOP FMA4 FMA3 LZCNT BMI1 5.6 fps - Intel Pentium G3258 @ 4.2GHz^ ( 2C / 2T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 LZCNT 5.5 fps - Intel Xeon X5470 @ 3.33GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.1 Cache64 4.8 fps - Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.3GHz ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 4.4 fps - Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.8GHz^ ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.1 Cache64 4.2 fps - Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.1GHz ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX 3.7 fps - Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.1 Cache64 3.6 fps - Intel Core i3-4005U @ 1.7GHz ( 2C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 FMA3 LZCNT BMI2 1.9 fps - AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 2.6GHz ( 4C / 4T ) MMX2 SSE2Fast LZCNT
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 25th June 2019 at 12:38. |
|
3rd August 2019, 04:23 | #11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
|
Quote:
It has an updated scheduler, but I think not so enhanced for Threadripper to wait for miracles. If I had a 2990WX I would definitely try Coreprio.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1) HEVC decoding benchmarks H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all |
|
3rd August 2019, 04:30 | #12 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 328
|
Switch to linux? The scheduler problem doesn't exist there. You can always run windows in an emulator, or use UNRAID as your base and have both Linux and Windows available on your system in native mode, with hardware passthrough.
|
3rd August 2019, 10:03 | #13 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
Quote:
1) install Linux 2) setup virtual machine on linux 3) install windows 10 on virtual machine Done.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 3rd August 2019 at 12:15. |
|
8th August 2019, 11:05 | #14 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Palmcoast of Norway
Posts: 363
|
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...502-7742&num=4
Looks like Phoronix´s benchmark isnt able to saturate all these cores... but nevertheless.. impressive numbers for the new EPYC 7xx2 series |
25th June 2019, 08:26 | #15 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
zen 2 supports proper 256bit avx 2 like intel, zen 1 used 2 x 128bit. 256bit AVX2 support increases performance of x265 by quite a bit, maybe 10% or something so i wouldn't buy zen+ if you are going to be doing quite a bit of x265 encoding.
Last edited by hajj_3; 26th June 2019 at 09:13. |
25th June 2019, 13:30 | #17 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
It is just a matter of your budget. Ryzen 3600 looks good if you OC to 4.5GHz.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
25th June 2019, 14:47 | #18 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,750
|
Quote:
Operating costs also factor in, ala pixels per picojoule. |
|
25th June 2019, 15:26 | #19 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
Have you seen 9900k with AVX-512 support recently?
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
25th June 2019, 21:14 | #20 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,406
|
The i9-9900X supports AVX-512, not the k.
It is odd that list of benchmarks isn't using AVX-512 on the i9-7900X or anything else, it would be nice to know how much impact it has.
__________________
madVR options explained Last edited by Asmodian; 25th June 2019 at 21:16. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|