Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
13th August 2005, 00:56 | #2 | Link |
retired developer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,978
|
__________________
Detritus Software |
13th August 2005, 01:17 | #5 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
|
|
13th August 2005, 10:23 | #6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,770
|
there is no such changelog for development builds available afaik
__________________
Between the weak and the strong one it is the freedom which oppresses and the law that liberates (Jean Jacques Rousseau) I know, that I know nothing (Socrates) MPEG-4 ASP FAQ | AVC/H.264 FAQ | AAC FAQ | MP4 FAQ | MP4Menu stores DVD Menus in MP4 (guide) Ogg Theora | Ogg Vorbis use WM9 today and get Micro$oft controlling the A/V market tomorrow for free |
24th August 2005, 01:24 | #10 | Link | |
李姗倩 Lǐ Shān Qiàn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,340
|
Quote:
I was too lazy to post about that, but you can check http://ffdshow.faireal.net/ Afaik, ffdshow-20050822.exe & ffdshow-20050822MSVC71.exe = the same code, different compilers (ICL vs. VC), there might be speed difference. Also, altho this should be rather exceptional or accidental, IIRC there was at least one file in the past that doesn't play with the ICL version but does play with the MSVC version of ffdshow. Last edited by Liisachan; 16th March 2006 at 01:13. |
|
24th August 2005, 01:25 | #11 | Link | ||
Always trying
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The O.C.
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
24th August 2005, 01:14 | #13 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6
|
What the difference between:
ffdshow-20050822.exe & ffdshow-20050822MSVC71.exe Does one (or the other) explicitly need MSVC71.dll ? Or not, as it's included in the build or something?
__________________
this is not a link |
3rd September 2005, 01:23 | #14 | Link |
李姗倩 Lǐ Shān Qiàn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,340
|
Which options in High Profile? I've tested quite a few AVC files in MP4 with --analyse all --8x8dct (and --bframes 6 --b-pyramid --ref 15), but all of them play fine with the latest ffdshow ICL version. (Although, QuickTime 7 apparantly doesn't like High Profile if complicated)
|
3rd September 2005, 05:37 | #16 | Link | ||
李姗倩 Lǐ Shān Qiàn
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,340
|
Quote:
Quote:
But my experience is still limited, and there seem to be some more complicated options that advanced users are testing... x264.exe has really many switches. |
||
3rd September 2005, 08:15 | #18 | Link | ||
Always trying
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The O.C.
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Koti; 3rd September 2005 at 08:17. |
||
3rd September 2005, 13:11 | #19 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,783
|
AFAIK (and bond confirmed), x264 does not yet provide interlaced encoding (Ateme does). But that's already mentioned in the thread about "x264 development"...
Last edited by LigH; 3rd September 2005 at 13:14. |
|
|