Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
17th February 2013, 19:50 | #122 | Link | |
もこたんインしたお!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland / Japan
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
Just like (MPEG-4) AVC is the ISO/IEC name for what is called H.264 over at the ITU-T.
__________________
[I'm human, no debug]
|
|
18th February 2013, 00:20 | #124 | Link |
もこたんインしたお!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland / Japan
Posts: 512
|
It was indeed. Since numbers are usually only given relatively close to finalization of the specification (although yes, it still isn't finished).
In any case, my point was that both HEVC and H.265 are valid names for the format (I generally will be calling it HEVC because that's how I've been calling it for the past XY months, and the fact that it gained another nickname isn't going to change much of that habit)
__________________
[I'm human, no debug]
|
18th February 2013, 22:40 | #129 | Link |
Testeur de codecs
Join Date: May 2003
Location: France
Posts: 2,484
|
anyway the work for x264 is incredible ... perhaps time for other dev to work to x265.
__________________
Le Sagittaire ... ;-) 1- Ateme AVC or x264 2- VP7 or RV10 only for anime 3- XviD, DivX or WMV9 Last edited by Guest; 18th February 2013 at 23:18. Reason: 3, 4 |
19th February 2013, 08:16 | #130 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,781
|
Hype victim.
There are very few people willing to spend a week on a movie just to be a "pioneer" using a bleeding edge technology, not understanding that most consumers and casual users will demand a conversion being faster than playing time. Give the developers the time they need to really understand the concepts, even before they start implementing half-baked code. A good software project is started in theory, and it is "almost done" (regarding its definition) before the first line of code starts. The less you know where you go, the more often you have to go back because you took a wrong turn. |
19th February 2013, 10:31 | #131 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,281
|
Not to mention, afaik, it was over 12months after version 1 of H.264 before the first commit of x264. And x264 was not fast initially.
Have we even got a final draft of HEVC yet? I guess people these days are less patient.
__________________
http://www.7-zip.org/ |
19th February 2013, 13:20 | #133 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,049
|
H.265 is designed for progressive video - mostly those with higher resolution in mind (4k and 8k)
Today probably yes especially for 4k content (8 k for sure) - count H.265 as 4 - 16 times more demanding than H.264 for CPU speed. Quote:
Last edited by Guest; 19th February 2013 at 14:39. Reason: 6 |
|
19th February 2013, 17:04 | #134 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
Recently there's a disturbing trend of some DVDs coming out with 30p content. In this case, I actually prefer 30i as I can deinterlace it with QTGMC to get nice 60p content. With 30p, the best I can do is to double the framerate with Interframe, and the results are not as good as deinterlacing 30i with QTGMC. |
|
28th February 2013, 20:17 | #138 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
28th February 2013, 20:19 | #139 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
28th February 2013, 21:02 | #140 | Link | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|