Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > New and alternative video codecs
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17th August 2009, 04:58   #7841  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by nm View Post
Upload a sample clip to MediaFire so we can take a look at it.
heres a sample: http://www.sendspace.com/file/u83a49
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 09:39   #7842  |  Link
albain
Media Control author
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by clsid View Post
I assume that this also useful for the 'old' code in the current SVN trunk? If so, you could already commit that part.
I am currently making a cleaner code and removing the non working part.

Then I will commit it
albain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 10:43   #7843  |  Link
nm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
hm how can I do that, using hardware deinterlacing with ffdshow?
Go to "Output" page in ffdshow video decoder configuration,
Select "Set interlace flag in output media type" and Method: "Bob"
Select NV12 colorspace and unselect all other colorspaces.

Remove all filters (deinterlacers, resizing, ...) that you were using.
If hardware deinterlacing and denoising doesn't work after these settings, try different renderers.

Quote:
heres a sample: http://www.sendspace.com/file/u83a49
Yes, the problem of jumping texture/noise patterns is in the video and the only way to reduce it during realtime playback seems to be heavy denoising that destroys fine details. Not all videos need such filtering, so I'd rather re-encode this problematic movie with some AviSynth filtering or set up a playback filtering chain separate from the one that I normally use.
nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 12:10   #7844  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
hardware deinterlacing works now that way, thanks. playback is quite a bit faster now and also had noise problem got somewhat better due to that. not as good as with powerdvd, but still better than all those software renderers.
only remaining problem seems to be that when I activate sharpening and the camera moves then the sharpened layer also seems to jump as well :S

btw. is it still possible to use (.ass) subs with hardware deinterlacing?
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 12:17   #7845  |  Link
clsid
*****
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,647
If you use the internal subtitle renderer of MPC then it should work.
__________________
MPC-HC 2.2.1
clsid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 12:26   #7846  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
whats actually the purpose of directvobsub/vsfilter then if the internal filter already should work?
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 12:49   #7847  |  Link
tetsuo55
MPC-HC Project Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
whats actually the purpose of directvobsub/vsfilter then if the internal filter already should work?
All filters are available for "other" directshow video players like windows media player.

Vsfilter is also interesting for mpc-hc use, some bugs that are in the internal splitter are not in vsfilter and vice versa (this has to do with the way the subs are drawn to the screen)
__________________
MPC-HC, an open source project everyone can improve. Want to help? Test Nightly Builds, submit patches or bugs and chat on IRC
tetsuo55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 13:33   #7848  |  Link
nm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
only remaining problem seems to be that when I activate sharpening and the camera moves then the sharpened layer also seems to jump as well :S
What sharpening? If you sharpen with ffdshow before hardware deinterlacing, serious artifacting is certainly expected.
nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 16:19   #7849  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
I sharpen with ffdshow, yes (needed for downscaling in order not to have a too blury picture). but how 'before hardware deinterlacing', can I influence the order which of these comes first?
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 16:58   #7850  |  Link
DarkZell666
aka XaS
 
DarkZell666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
I sharpen with ffdshow, yes (needed for downscaling in order not to have a too blury picture). but how 'before hardware deinterlacing', can I influence the order which of these comes first?
Hardware de-interlacing comes last no matter what, so ... you can't =) Either use a sharpener that supports interlaced input, or separate fields + sharpen + weave.
__________________

Q9300 OC @ 3.2ghz / Asus P5E3 / 4GB PC10600 / Geforce 8600 GTS
DarkZell666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 17:09   #7851  |  Link
nm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
I sharpen with ffdshow, yes (needed for downscaling in order not to have a too blury picture). but how 'before hardware deinterlacing', can I influence the order which of these comes first?
You can't. AFAIK, hardware deinterlacing (and other hardware postprocessing) is done at the rendering stage, so ffdshow can't get the frames back for further processing.
nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 17:12   #7852  |  Link
leeperry
Kid for Today
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
sharpen with ffdshow [..] hardware deinterlacing
you only option is the PS sharpening scripts in MPC/KMP I think..try the default one at 0.65, it looks good, not as good as LSF though.

or through your graphic card drivers maybe?

Last edited by leeperry; 17th August 2009 at 17:16.
leeperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 18:18   #7853  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
hm I have a radeon 4770, at least I haven't seen such an option in catalyst control center
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 18:27   #7854  |  Link
nm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
hm I have a radeon 4770, at least I haven't seen such an option in catalyst control center
Looks like edge enhancement and denoising should be adjustable (or at least used to be): http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1060000
nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 18:46   #7855  |  Link
Thunderbolt8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,197
wtf, denoising of 64 is the default setting 0o

in order to be as close to be to the original intended presentation as possible, I guess such options as denoising & edge enhancement & dynamic constrast have to be disabled then?
Thunderbolt8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 19:04   #7856  |  Link
nm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post
in order to be as close to be to the original intended presentation as possible, I guess such options as denoising & edge enhancement & dynamic constrast have to be disabled then?
Yes, if the video is intended to look the way it does. Your sample most likely isn't.

One of the reasons for denoising by default is that review sites test the video playback quality of graphics cards and other devices by playing benchmark videos such as HD HQV. The tested device gets better benchmark scores if it denoises noisy scenes properly.
nm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th August 2009, 20:17   #7857  |  Link
leeperry
Kid for Today
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,477
hehe, you opened Pandora's box...graphic drivers doing funky stuff on VMR/EVR(especially ATi). there's a good reason why some ppl prefer HR/mVR
leeperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2009, 20:40   #7858  |  Link
ikarad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 546
What means "Added new audio structure for windows 7" in rev 3056?

"Revision 3056 - Directory Listing
Modified Mon Aug 17 12:37:38 2009 UTC (30 hours, 59 minutes ago) by albain

Added new audio structure for windows 7
Added a verification of supported output sample format when the codec changes"
ikarad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2009, 22:31   #7859  |  Link
clsid
*****
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,647
It means better S/PDIF support.
__________________
MPC-HC 2.2.1
clsid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2009, 22:06   #7860  |  Link
Mercury_22
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,138
Some interesting news Dolby Digital Plus Chosen as an Audio Format for Windows 7 !
Maybe we will need the full 7.1 channels DD+ working in the end, cause this may rise back the almost dead DD+ format ?!
__________________
Intel UHD Graphics 750; Win 10 22H2
Mercury_22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ffdshow, ffdshow tryouts, ffdshow-mt, ffplay, icl


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.