Big DVD Noise - Page 2

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 00:02

EDIT: Link removed, look here...

Bye

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 00:24

Thanks, can you tell me it is faster tha FFT3D or not.

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 00:28

Speed should be similar to FFT3D or PixieDust... But why dont you simply test it yaself!? Takes only 5 minutes or so to do a compare with 1000 frames, heh!?

Bye

Alain2 · 15th April 2006, 01:13

Thank you for the plugin!

The explanation given with it reminds me of MarcFD's style ^^ Can you roughly say what type of denoising is involved in this plugin ? I am always interested in understanding a bit what a filter is doing

Also what is T ? And what do you mean by overflow ? Does it will take too much memory ?

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 03:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alain2

Also what is T ?

Ohw, T is the threshold, gonna update the zip... ^^;

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alain2

Can you roughly say what type of denoising is involved in this plugin ? I am always interested in understanding a bit what a filter is doing :)

Very roughly: Fractal denoising!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alain2

And what do you mean by overflow ? Does it will take too much memory ?

Simply try to find out... ;D

Bye

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 03:59

Btw, I just noticed that I uploaded the old (slow) version!

Here is the newer faster one: FRFun3b

Bye

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 08:41

I am yust now finsh encoding with FFT3D and i very happy with results. So i am now go to test this FRFun.

Serbianboss · 15th April 2006, 10:15

which parametars to use with frfun.

i use:

avisource("D:\CAPTURE\bmw.avi")
LoadPlugin("frfun3b.dll")
ConvertToYuY2(interlaced=true)
frfun3b(S=3,T=3)

So, which is agressive parametars?

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 10:19

@Serbianboss how work, it is faster than FFT3D

Serbianboss · 15th April 2006, 10:20

if you use parametars 5-5 its faster. Whit parametars 3-3 its slow

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 10:41

Well, its simple...

More subsampling = Less processing = Faster!

Bye

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 10:49

Yes it is faster but i tryed settings frfun3b(S=1,T=3) and frfun3b(S=1,T=5) it is so washed out but settings like frfun3b(S=1,T=2) not do enything there is noise, looks this filter is only good for anime, So my answer is FFT3D.

@All Thanks for help i soloved the problem

Bye

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 12:49

If T=3 looks too smooth and T=2 keeps too much noise why dont you try T=2.5 heh!? ;P

Bye

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 13:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulhunter

If T=3 looks too smooth and T=2 keeps too much noise why dont you try T=2.5 heh!? ;P

Bye

Yes i try but avisynth told wrong T parameter.

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 14:17

Erm, you are right, while FRFun3 used floats FRFun3b uses ints... O.o

Bye

shon3i · 15th April 2006, 14:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soulhunter

Erm, you are right, while FRFun3 used floats FRFun3b uses ints... O.o

Bye

Correct, can you tell me how much FRFun3 slower than FRFun3b, Thnaks

Soulhunter · 15th April 2006, 14:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by shon3i

Correct, can you tell me how much FRFun3 slower than FRFun3b, Thnaks

It was 1fps -vs- 15fps iirc... XD

But in exchange it does a much better job!

Bye

Fizick · 18th April 2006, 22:26

frfun is interesting filter!
It must be developed.
More info?

I assume, it is pure spatial?

Alain2 · 18th April 2006, 22:47

frfun3b is interesting for me on its lowest setting (1,1) on a noisy film I have ; will try on anime to see what it can do with them

(frfun3 is too slow to be usable for me)

Soulhunter · 19th April 2006, 10:07

@ Fizick

Yeah, the two versions posted here are spatial, there's also a version with temporal processing, but its very slow! Anyway, frfun was more a "proof of concept" filter, we'll probably see other filters based on it in future, lets wait n see... ^^

Bye

15th April 2006, 00:02	#21 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	EDIT: Link removed, look here... Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel Last edited by Soulhunter; 10th May 2006 at 18:27.

15th April 2006, 00:28	#23 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	Speed should be similar to FFT3D or PixieDust... But why dont you simply test it yaself!? Takes only 5 minutes or so to do a compare with 1000 frames, heh!? Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel

15th April 2006, 03:59	#26 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	Btw, I just noticed that I uploaded the old (slow) version! Here is the newer faster one: FRFun3b Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel Last edited by Soulhunter; 10th May 2006 at 18:26.

15th April 2006, 10:15	#28 \| Link
Serbianboss Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 232	which parametars to use with frfun. i use: avisource("D:\CAPTURE\bmw.avi") LoadPlugin("frfun3b.dll") ConvertToYuY2(interlaced=true) frfun3b(S=3,T=3) So, which is agressive parametars? Last edited by Serbianboss; 15th April 2006 at 10:21.

15th April 2006, 10:41	#31 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	Well, its simple... More subsampling = Less processing = Faster! Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel

15th April 2006, 00:24	#22 \| Link
shon3i BluRay Maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,419	Thanks, can you tell me it is faster tha FFT3D or not.

15th April 2006, 01:13	#24 \| Link
Alain2 Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 236	Thank you for the plugin! The explanation given with it reminds me of MarcFD's style ^^ Can you roughly say what type of denoising is involved in this plugin ? I am always interested in understanding a bit what a filter is doing Also what is T ? And what do you mean by overflow ? Does it will take too much memory ?

15th April 2006, 08:41	#27 \| Link
shon3i BluRay Maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,419	I am yust now finsh encoding with FFT3D and i very happy with results. So i am now go to test this FRFun.

15th April 2006, 10:19	#29 \| Link
shon3i BluRay Maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,419	@Serbianboss how work, it is faster than FFT3D

15th April 2006, 10:20	#30 \| Link
Serbianboss Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 232	if you use parametars 5-5 its faster. Whit parametars 3-3 its slow

15th April 2006, 10:49	#32 \| Link
shon3i BluRay Maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,419	Yes it is faster but i tryed settings frfun3b(S=1,T=3) and frfun3b(S=1,T=5) it is so washed out but settings like frfun3b(S=1,T=2) not do enything there is noise, looks this filter is only good for anime, So my answer is FFT3D. @All Thanks for help i soloved the problem Bye

15th April 2006, 12:49	#33 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	If T=3 looks too smooth and T=2 keeps too much noise why dont you try T=2.5 heh!? ;P Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel Last edited by Soulhunter; 15th April 2006 at 12:55.

15th April 2006, 14:17	#35 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	Erm, you are right, while FRFun3 used floats FRFun3b uses ints... O.o Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel

18th April 2006, 22:26	#38 \| Link
Fizick AviSynth plugger Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Russia Posts: 2,183	frfun is interesting filter! It must be developed. More info? I assume, it is pure spatial?

18th April 2006, 22:47	#39 \| Link
Alain2 Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 236	frfun3b is interesting for me on its lowest setting (1,1) on a noisy film I have ; will try on anime to see what it can do with them (frfun3 is too slow to be usable for me)

19th April 2006, 10:07	#40 \| Link
Soulhunter Bored... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Unknown Posts: 2,812	@ Fizick Yeah, the two versions posted here are spatial, there's also a version with temporal processing, but its very slow! Anyway, frfun was more a "proof of concept" filter, we'll probably see other filters based on it in future, lets wait n see... ^^ Bye __________________ Visit my IRC channel

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode