Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 AVC / H.264

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28th July 2009, 07:31   #2041  |  Link
JEEB
もこたんインしたお!
 
JEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland / Japan
Posts: 514
1190 builds rebuilt, re-uploaded (all but the unmodified one, which had no patches, so (ry)
__________________
[I'm human, no debug]
JEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 07:34   #2042  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEEB View Post
1190 builds rebuilt, re-uploaded (all but the unmodified one, which had no patches, so (ry)
Sorry, but your efforts were in vain!
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 13:23   #2043  |  Link
MythCreator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 77
x264 rev.1192 unpatched x86
download

built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.4.0 (release) (TDM-GCC)

fprofiled
MythCreator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 14:29   #2044  |  Link
juGGaKNot
Registered User
 
juGGaKNot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 733
What setting does the --tune fastdecode have ?

ahh nvm

Quote:
+ else if( !strcasecmp( optarg, "fastdecode" ) )

+ {

+ param->b_deblocking_filter = 0;

+ param->b_cabac = 0;

+ param->analyse.b_weighted_bipred = 0;

+ }
Quote:
Originally Posted by MythCreator View Post
x264 rev.1192 unpatched x86
download

built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.4.0 (release) (TDM-GCC)

fprofiled
Try filefront/mediafire ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MythCreator View Post
hmm..I'll upload to FileFront
I found the download, well hidden!

Last edited by juGGaKNot; 28th July 2009 at 14:54.
juGGaKNot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 14:32   #2045  |  Link
Audionut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,267
http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermai...ly/006096.html

Quote:
+ else if( !strcasecmp( optarg, "fastdecode" ) )
+ {
+ param->b_deblocking_filter = 0;
+ param->b_cabac = 0;
+ param->analyse.b_weighted_bipred = 0;
+ }
__________________
http://www.7-zip.org/
Audionut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 14:53   #2046  |  Link
MythCreator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by juGGaKNot View Post


Try filefront/mediafire ?
hmm..I'll upload to FileFront




x264 rev 1192 patched build

Download

built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.4.0 (release) (TDM-GCC)

fprofiled

patched with:
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff

Last edited by MythCreator; 28th July 2009 at 15:03.
MythCreator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 15:04   #2047  |  Link
gator1102
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4
http://xeph.textcube.com/2/attach/x264.exe
x264 rev.1192 _ 32-bit binary with MP4 output

Intel C++ Compiler (icc) v11.1.038

Used patches:

x264_icc_03_win.diff
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff
x264-r1183-threaded-slicetype-v17.diff
gator1102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 15:21   #2048  |  Link
techouse
Strictly Rhythm
 
techouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 166
x264_x64_r1192_unpatched | MD5
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), unpatched, generic, fprofiled

________________________________________________________________________________

x264_x86_r1192_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x86.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

x264_x64_r1192_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

Patches used:

x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
__________________
techouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 19:48   #2049  |  Link
techouse
Strictly Rhythm
 
techouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 166
x264_x64_r1193_unpatched | MD5
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), unpatched, generic, fprofiled

________________________________________________________________________________

x264_x86_r1193_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x86.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

x264_x64_r1193_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

Patches used:

x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
__________________
techouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 20:07   #2050  |  Link
JEEB
もこたんインしたお!
 
JEEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland / Japan
Posts: 514
x264 r1193 64bit unpatched:
download ; hash
  • built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.3.4 20090220 (prerelease) (x64.generic.Komisar)
  • fprofiled, otherwise defaults
________________________________________________________________________________

x264 r1193 32bit
download ; release notes
  • built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.3.4 20090220 (prerelease) (x32.generic.Komisar)
  • fprofiled, -march=i686

x264 r1193 64bit
download ; release notes
  • built on Jul 28 2009, gcc: 4.3.4 20090220 (prerelease) (x64.generic.Komisar)
  • fprofiled, -march=core2

patched with:
  • x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
  • x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff

My help is probably unneeded, but since this is what my building script outputs nowadays, I'll be using this base I guess
__________________
[I'm human, no debug]
JEEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 20:16   #2051  |  Link
mopurist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
Still Assertion Failed here...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trahald View Post
Hrd 15.
Sorry, maybe I misunderstand, but is this version supposed to fix the error described in post 2036?

I just recompiled x264 with this patch and I get the same failure. (Linux 64-bit, if it matters)

Quote:
x264: encoder/set.c:644: x264_sei_picture_timing_write: Assertion `dpb_output_delay < pow( 2, sps->vui.nal_hrd_parameters.i_dpb_output_delay_length )' failed.
Thanks.
mopurist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2009, 22:42   #2052  |  Link
Trahald
Wewkiee
 
Trahald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: kashyyyk
Posts: 2,270
whats your command line.
__________________
...yeah...but...why on earth would I compare apples with apples?
Trahald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 01:15   #2053  |  Link
imk
|ン、)
 
imk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 77
x264-r1193M-imk-win.7z
win_build_info.txt
imk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 03:36   #2054  |  Link
mopurist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
OK, so I'm stupid...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trahald View Post
whats your command line.
When I run with the same options XhmikosR described, it does work. I hadn't updated x264 for several months, and now that I have, a script I used previously without issue dies with the assertion failed.

If I trim the command used by the script down as far as the following, the assertion still fails:
Quote:
/usr/bin/wine /home/mopurist/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/avs2yuv.exe /home/mopurist/test.avs -raw - | x264 --bitrate 7000 --level 4.1 --nal-hrd --vbv-maxrate 50000 --vbv-bufsize 50000 --output test.264 - 1440x1080 --fps 29.970
The actual command the script uses is:
Quote:
/usr/bin/wine "${avs2yuvdir}/avs2yuv.exe" "${workdir}/${1}.avs" -raw -| /usr/bin/x264 --b-adapt 2 --pass 1 --psy-rd 1.0:0.2 --aq-strength 1.3 --bitrate $2 --stats "${workdir}/${1}.stats" --level 4.1 --nal-hrd --ref 4 --mixed-refs --bframes 4 --b-pyramid --no-fast-pskip --weightb --me umh --direct auto --keyint 300 --min-keyint 30 --vbv-maxrate 62500 --vbv-bufsize 62500 --mvrange 511 --aud --subme 7 --trellis 2 --analyse p8x8,b8x8,i4x4,i8x8 --8x8dct --threads auto --thread-input --deblock 0,1 --sar 4:3 --output "${twosixfourdir}/${1}_final.264" - 1440x1080 --fps 29.970
So, obviously I don't know what the assertion is testing, nor do I understand how it is determined or what the purpose of the change is, that now results in an assertion failed.

Any help in understanding and fixing the issue would be appreciated.

Thanks.
mopurist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 04:34   #2055  |  Link
ACoolie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
In a vanilla icc-compiled x264 r1193 build i get the following error around 300 frames into the second pass of an encode. CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are just "-openmp."
Quote:
x264: encoder/analyse.c:1175: x264_mb_analyse_inter_p16x16: Assertion `a->l0.me16x16.mv[1] <= h->mb.mv_max_spel[1] || h->param.i_threads == 1' failed.
x264 -B 1264 -o 1.h264 -p2 --merange 24 --level 4.1 --fps 24000/1001 --sar 32/27 -b 12 -f -2,-2 --frames 52560 --psy-rd 1.3:0.15 --aq-strength 1.0 --aq-mode 2 --stats .stats - 708x348 --preset slower --no-fast-pskip --b-pyramid -m10
A gcc-compiled x264 works perfectly. If I set subme to 9 and use the icc build, it works as well.
ACoolie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 04:39   #2056  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,689
.... I'm a complete idiot, it seems... adding more subme values and not increasing the size of the array... I'm shocked it worked at all.

Fix committed.

Last edited by Dark Shikari; 29th July 2009 at 04:45.
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 04:58   #2057  |  Link
Dark Shikari
x264 developer
 
Dark Shikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,689
OK, now this is brilliant.

Code:
static const int subpel_iterations[][4] =
   {{0,0,0,0},
    {1,1,0,0},
    {0,1,1,0},
    {0,2,1,0},
    {0,2,1,1},
    {0,2,1,2},
    {0,0,2,2},
    {0,0,2,2},
    {0,0,4,10},
    {0,0,4,10}};

/* (x-1)%6 */
static const int mod6m1[8] = {5,0,1,2,3,4,5,0};
Accessing the array positions subpel_iterations[10][2] and subpel_iterations[10][3] gave "1,2", a reasonable enough hpel/qpel value, which resulted in me never noticing the problem.

Of course, on a compiler that didn't happen to arrange the data adjacently in memory...
Dark Shikari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 05:03   #2058  |  Link
Trahald
Wewkiee
 
Trahald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: kashyyyk
Posts: 2,270
@mopurist
Hmm... i couldnt duplicate the issue, but i'll keep trying.

Except for wasting a few bits.. rev 13 of the patch is fine to use.
__________________
...yeah...but...why on earth would I compare apples with apples?
Trahald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 11:15   #2059  |  Link
techouse
Strictly Rhythm
 
techouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 166
x264_x64_r1195_unpatched | MD5
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), unpatched, generic, fprofiled

________________________________________________________________________________

x264_x86_r1195_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x86.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

x264_x64_r1195_techouse | INFO
GCC 4.4.0 20090524 (x64.core2.Komisar), fprofiled, -march=core2

Patches used:

x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
__________________
techouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2009, 12:23   #2060  |  Link
MythCreator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 77
x264_x86_r1195_MythCreator

Download

GCC 4.4.1 released (MythCreator build), fprofiled

Patches used:

x264_hrd_pulldown.15_interlace.diff
x264_win_zone_parse_fix_05.diff
MythCreator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
h.264, x264, x264 builds, x264 patches, x264 unofficial builds

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.