Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 AVC / H.264

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st December 2008, 22:06   #1  |  Link
DMagic1
Registered User
 
DMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 507
When to go with 720p instead of 1080p? Bitrate dependent?

Heres my question/problem.....

I have a 1080p source that I am trying to fit on a dvd9 that will be played on a bluray player.
The bitrate to fit will bring it down to 6463 where as it was about 8900.
Would I get a better picture if I went ahead and resized it to to 720p with that same bitrate over keeping it at 1080p with that bitrate?

Thanks
DMagic1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 22:22   #2  |  Link
Snowknight26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,430
Better (eep!) picture than the 1080p encode? Or compared to the source? Bad comparison. :\
Snowknight26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 22:40   #3  |  Link
DMagic1
Registered User
 
DMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 507
I meant after I encode it to the small enough size not compared to the original 1080p source.
Which would have better quality.
DMagic1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 22:56   #4  |  Link
Atak_Snajpera
RipBot264 author
 
Atak_Snajpera's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,810
Quote:
Would I get a better picture if I went ahead and resized it to to 720p with that same bitrate over keeping it at 1080p with that bitrate?
I would go for 720p because 6MBps for 1080p is too small in my opinion. Check my post here : http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...50#post1218450
You will see that difference between 720p and 1080p is not that big. Lower resolution + higher bitrate = Less visible compression artifacts.
Atak_Snajpera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2008, 23:29   #5  |  Link
DMagic1
Registered User
 
DMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera View Post
I would go for 720p because 6MBps for 1080p is too small in my opinion. Check my post here : http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...50#post1218450
You will see that difference between 720p and 1080p is not that big. Lower resolution + higher bitrate = Less visible compression artifacts.
Yeah that just what I was thinking. Thanks for the help.
DMagic1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 00:10   #6  |  Link
Sagekilla
x264aholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,752
That works two ways though. At higher resolutions, compression artifacts are comparatively smaller to the frame itself. On a 640x480 frame, they're much bigger compared to artifacts present in a 1920x1080.
__________________
You can't call your encoding speed slow until you start measuring in seconds per frame.
Sagekilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 01:22   #7  |  Link
Blue_MiSfit
Derek Prestegard IRL
 
Blue_MiSfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,989
Yep.

Some 1080p content looks quite good at 3-6mbps, some really needs 12-20 to look awesome.

~MiSfit
__________________
These are all my personal statements, not those of my employer :)
Blue_MiSfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 02:52   #8  |  Link
DMagic1
Registered User
 
DMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 507
Guess it comes down to understanding your source. Dark scenes most likely won't look good at such a low rate. Other factors can play a big part in the bitrate requirement also.
DMagic1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 04:06   #9  |  Link
Sagekilla
x264aholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,752
For most sources, ~6 mbps on 720p will provide very good quality. A few might require over this for some scenes, but it should look good otherwise. 1080p is tricky though. If you don't plan on watching it from about 4-5 feet away from a large screen, you probably won't notice compression artifacts as much, especially given their relative size to the frames.

I'd still go with 720p @ 6 mbps though, it's faster to encode and you won't have to worry so much that it might come out crappy.
__________________
You can't call your encoding speed slow until you start measuring in seconds per frame.
Sagekilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 08:25   #10  |  Link
G_M_C
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagekilla View Post
[...]If you don't plan on watching it from about 4-5 feet away from a large screen[...]
There is yet another point to make on that subject; In many cases the benifit of 1080p is small if you sit more than 5 feet away from your screen. Simply because your eyes cannot see the higher resolution.

There are graphs on this subject to be found all over the net, i'll give one here;

G_M_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2008, 17:06   #11  |  Link
DMagic1
Registered User
 
DMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 507
I see

Last edited by DMagic1; 2nd December 2008 at 17:09.
DMagic1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.