Simple Resize

24hourloop · 25th January 2002, 02:23

I may be crazy but:

Windows XP
Athlons 1.0 and 1.2Ghz

Plenty of harddrive
Plenty of memory

I see only maybe 10% improvement over BilinearResize. Is this correct?

trbarry · 25th January 2002, 02:39

Could be, depending upon whether you are using other filters.

I can't seem to run VTune right with Avisynth but in straight DVD2AVI the resize takes maybe only 25% of the total job. So we coudn't reduce the job time by more than 25% even if we made it instantaneous.

But I think I've seen a couple results slightly better. And I still have used SSE2 for only about half the code and SSEMMX not at all. These should give marginal improvements soon, for some machines.

But thanks for testing.

- Tom

25th January 2002, 02:23	#1 \| Link
24hourloop Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Texas Posts: 185	Simple Resize I may be crazy but: Windows XP Athlons 1.0 and 1.2Ghz Plenty of harddrive Plenty of memory I see only maybe 10% improvement over BilinearResize. Is this correct?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25th January 2002, 02:39	#2 \| Link
trbarry Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Gainesville FL USA Posts: 2,092	Could be, depending upon whether you are using other filters. I can't seem to run VTune right with Avisynth but in straight DVD2AVI the resize takes maybe only 25% of the total job. So we coudn't reduce the job time by more than 25% even if we made it instantaneous. But I think I've seen a couple results slightly better. And I still have used SSE2 for only about half the code and SSEMMX not at all. These should give marginal improvements soon, for some machines. But thanks for testing. - Tom