Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
7th July 2019, 16:24 | #41 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,812
|
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
7th July 2019, 18:08 | #42 | Link |
Pig on the wing
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 5,730
|
Looks like a 3700X is the new 1700X as the best bang for buck. Hopefully we'll see a benchmark for the most used presets like slow, slower and veryslow.
We should really thank AMD for keeping the socket the same for all these years, upgrading gets very cheap.
__________________
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of the Moon... |
7th July 2019, 18:56 | #45 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,812
|
Quote:
used my x265 fhd benchmark http://forum.pclab.pl/topic/1184884-x265-FHD-Benchmark/ That guy also used the same benchmark but instead of fps showed elapsed time in seconds. To get fps you have to do this 2500/seconds. https://youtu.be/rcFUGSElZEs?t=8m18s
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 7th July 2019 at 19:01. |
|
7th July 2019, 19:34 | #46 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
Quote:
Code:
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 @ 3.4GHz ( 8C / 16T ) y4m [info]: 1920x1080 fps 50/1 i420p8 sar 1:1 unknown frame count raw [info]: output file: NUL x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 2.2+15-a18ab7656c30 x265 [info]: build info [Windows][GCC 6.2.0][64 bit] 8bit x265 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX x265 [info]: Main Still Picture profile, Level-4.1 (Main tier) x265 [info]: Thread pool created using 16 threads x265 [info]: Slices : 1 x265 [info]: frame threads / pool features : 5 / wpp(17 rows) x265 [info]: Coding QT: max CU size, min CU size : 64 / 8 x265 [info]: Residual QT: max TU size, max depth : 32 / 1 inter / 1 intra x265 [info]: ME / range / subpel / merge : hex / 57 / 2 / 2 x265 [info]: Keyframe min / max / scenecut / bias: 50 / 500 / 40 / 5.00 x265 [info]: Lookahead / bframes / badapt : 20 / 4 / 2 x265 [info]: b-pyramid / weightp / weightb : 1 / 1 / 0 x265 [info]: References / ref-limit cu / depth : 3 / on / on x265 [info]: AQ: mode / str / qg-size / cu-tree : 1 / 1.0 / 32 / 1 x265 [info]: Rate Control / qCompress : CRF-28.0 / 0.60 x265 [info]: tools: rd=3 psy-rd=2.00 rskip signhide tmvp strong-intra-smoothing x265 [info]: tools: lslices=6 deblock sao encoded 2500 frames in 131.23s (19.05 fps), 7025.74 kbps, Avg QP:37.21 I realize this is only one particular x265 test scenario, but if I can get a 3x speed improvement with the much slower preset I normally use for 1080p x265 I should be in the car heading to Microcenter to buy a Ryzen 3900X system right now. |
|
7th July 2019, 19:44 | #47 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,812
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 7th July 2019 at 19:47. |
|
7th July 2019, 21:40 | #51 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
The 3900x is impressive, but I would also like to see some real world results. Benchmarks are great, but no one uses crf 28 to encode, or at least they shouldn't haha. I as well would like to see some crf 18-20 at slow, slower, very slow, slowest and placebo. Right now I encode my TV/Movie blurays on slow (1080P gets 5-7 fps), and anime on slower (1080P gets 0.8-1 fps if I am lucky!), with a Ryzen 2700. I haven't tried 4k yet as I don't own a compatible drive to rip the few 4k movies I own.
I score 21.97 fps on Atak's benchmark, and 3.03 on Sagitare's. |
7th July 2019, 21:46 | #52 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 729
|
Some other x265 tests I found:
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/a...-3900x/13.html TPU seems to meassure plain x265 and x264 at crf mode and slow preset, instead of frontends like handbrake. https://nl.hardware.info/reviews/939...4-x265-en-flac Staxrip x264 + x265. They have interactive graphs and comparison with a lot of CPUs. |
8th July 2019, 00:13 | #54 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
Quote:
I've been encoding 1080p at CRF 16 placebo 10-bit (8-bit source). It's ~0.25fps on my 8 or 10 core Ivy Bridge E5's. I have a lot of cores, but an old'ish CPU architecture. |
|
8th July 2019, 00:20 | #55 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,346
|
Quote:
https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreview...marks-vs-intel
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
|
8th July 2019, 04:40 | #56 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
I know not everyone will agree with me, but as someone who encodes and encodes, fps is far more important to me as every fps gained is an extra 2 or so minutes of footage encoded per hour (if I did the math right). Hence why I would like the actual results in that instead of time. |
|
8th July 2019, 10:05 | #58 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 589
|
Slightly off topic but apparently the hardware HEVC encoder in the Navi RX 5700 is way powerful, much faster than h264 implementatin
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi-_T3vsv-Q and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fY2fbAzFiUE |
8th July 2019, 18:00 | #59 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,812
|
Ryzen 1600 vs 2600 vs 3600 in x265 FHD Benchmark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zru...utu.be&t=3m28s
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
8th July 2019, 18:37 | #60 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
Quote:
Ryzen 5 1600 - 18.73 fps Ryzen 5 2600 - 21.10 fps Ryzen 5 3600 - 32.71 fps The Ryzen 9 3900X has twice as many cores as the Ryzen 5 3600 and is almost twice as fast. It looks to be pretty close to linear. So the Ryzen 9 3950X should be about 33% faster than the 3900X in the benchmark (presuming the TDP doesn't clobber it). Last edited by Stereodude; 8th July 2019 at 18:40. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|