Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
12th October 2011, 22:41 | #6141 | Link |
*****
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,643
|
Just keep it simple and add the basic processing to the decoders. Advanced stuff like Avisynth is only used by a tiny minority, and those can continue to use ffdshow for processing. For standard users, yourself included, the basics will be more than sufficient, and it is preferable to have just a single filter doing it magic.
__________________
MPC-HC 2.1.7.2 |
12th October 2011, 23:28 | #6142 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stockholm/Helsinki
Posts: 805
|
Quote:
So you can do pretty much anything you like. |
|
13th October 2011, 00:54 | #6143 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 374
|
Another request for Avisynth processing in video decoder (and no need for anything else). "Some basic filtering" with myriads of options looks very ffdshow-ish and belongs to separate filter.
Downmixing would be great in audio decoder (the only reason I still use ffdshow audio decoder). I disagree that deinterlacing is renderer's job - it should be done before almost any other filtering, so unless you want to put all filtering into renderer - decoder is good place for it. |
13th October 2011, 07:02 | #6147 | Link | ||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,344
|
Quote:
My "basic filtering" would probably fill half a propertys page, it would be limited to: deinterlace, denoise, deband and sharpen/blur. My main concern is that AviSynth is very complicated to use, even in simple setups. It requires setup of external support libraries (AviSynth itself and some plugins you want to use), so for anyone just wanting a simple denoiser or sharpener, thats alot to ask. From the code side of things, integrating libavfilter is pretty straight forward, so only the options concern remains. I might be willing to offer AviSynth support some day, but i don't want it to be the only way to do some very basic every-day processing. Quote:
Where i am standing right now on the whole subject, i will definitely add deinterlacing to the video decoder, and i will most likely add a mixer to the audio decoder. Anything beyond that, i'm not sure yet. Since deinterlacing will already use libavfilter, adding more filters will just be a matter of adding the options, the code is already there ... so why not? It will be limited to 3 or 4 processing operations, and there won't be much choice between different algorithms like ffdshow has. I'll lock myself in a room for a year or two and come out when its ready.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
||
13th October 2011, 08:20 | #6149 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 709
|
why with a divx and avisource on avisynth it still pupop-me "Couldn't locate a decompressor for fourcc dx50"?
(I think it doesn't work even changing fourcc to xvid, or divx...) ps ffvh instead doesn't work at all... Last edited by Motenai Yoda; 13th October 2011 at 08:22. |
13th October 2011, 08:27 | #6150 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Did you find a moment to have a look at that, nev? Thanks again! |
|
13th October 2011, 08:29 | #6151 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Resizing: Currently madVR supports the usual linear resampling filters like e.g. Lanczos. Quality should be slightly better than AviSynth"s implementation of the same algorithms because madVR does all its calculations in 32bit+ floating point bitdepth, while AviSynth (AFAIK) works in 8bit integer. Of course AviSynth has some non-linear scaling algorithms. E.g. NNEDI3 is much better quality than anything madVR currently does. But that's just the way it currently is. Non/linear scaling algorithms are planned for a future madVR version. |
|
13th October 2011, 08:32 | #6153 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 11
|
Hello
Can I add a video decoder or processor function to increase the number of frames, or as a POT player simply showing them a few times, or the calculation of intermediate frames. There is a DS-filter, which makes saschet intermediate frames on the video card. Uses CUDA. website http://dmitrirender.narod.ru/ |
13th October 2011, 08:50 | #6154 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
|
PS3 Mediaserver and WHS headless
copied frpom the LAV CUVID thread ...
--------------------- Thanks for building a great codec I run LAV on my W7/HTPC and get spectacular results However, I would also like to use it on my WHS/PS3Mediaserver/PS3/1080p TV. I have added a GTS450 video card to the WHS although 98% of the time it runs headless. The PS3 is connected to the WHS server over a gigabit network. I initially tried loading the LAV codec using the Shark007 codec pack (and K-Lite) but could not get it to recognise cuda. I then loaded LAV 0.37 and found PS3Mediaserver (SB50) recognises it as an FFmpeg codec accessed via AviSynth 2.5. When playing HD content (VC-1 and H264) using PS3 Mediaserver and a terminal connected to the server to enable CUDA processing I get: 1. lots of video stuttering (Q8400 CPU is running 20% on all 4 threads) 2. sound running 3x the video speed I have tried adding the TMT5 audio codec with no change - can I use the dll that comes loaded with Windows7 and do I need to rename it when I add it to the LAV directory? I have tried changing the LAV and PS3Mediaserver settings without much success. PS3Mediasever seems to run best (least stuttering) when I set: 1. the LAV video output format settings to 16 bit only 2. the LAV video display mode 25p/30p 3. the LAV deinterlacing algorithm 'none' 4. PS3Mediaserver 'lossless quality' What more can I do to get the video and audio playing properly please? Also when I go 'headless' GPU-Z shows the CUDA processing is not available - I have since been informed that a DVI-VGA dongle configured with three 68 Ohm resistors will simulate a monitor and trigger CUDA - many thanks. |
13th October 2011, 11:22 | #6155 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,344
|
If i give you a full mixer matrix, you can just control volume with that, if you wish. I won't create a separate "volume control" thing.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
13th October 2011, 11:24 | #6156 | Link |
Firefox User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 202
|
New nightly:
http://roy.orz.hm/lavf-w32-nightlies...ame-bb66f4f.7z diff: http://roy.orz.hm/lavf-w32-nightlies...e-bb66f4f.diff A test build for forcing the seeking of RV30/RV40 video to key frames only which preventing corrupted image after seeking of RV30/RV40 video. |
13th October 2011, 11:29 | #6157 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
One thing to consider the option to enable/disable matrix & control volume by remote control = keyboard shortcut
__________________
Intel UHD Graphics 750; Win 10 22H2 Last edited by Mercury_22; 13th October 2011 at 11:35. |
|
13th October 2011, 12:10 | #6158 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 374
|
nevcairiel, the problem with "basic filtering" is there is no line what is still "basic" and what is not. I'm not really against implementing libavfilter - it's just useless with access to Avisynth. After using things like MDegrain in no way you are going to be satisfied with primitive denoisers. Why integrate Avisynth and not put it in separate filter? Because you can export some interesting information directly to it (like, frame type, motion vectors if decoder provides them).
I don't remember being against downmuxing (only strongly against yadif ^_^). Downmuxing is something like P016->YV12 conversion and as well belongs to decoder. madshi, first example has nothing to do with BT.601/BT.709 gamut etc. Without metainformation (like in this case) you can only assume everything is in sRGB (image and device) and no correction is needed. And madVR does it correctly when displaying 1:1 with no scaling involved. But with any scaling it fails horribly as demonstrated. |
13th October 2011, 12:36 | #6159 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 589
|
Keep in mind that Avisynth cannot handle everything. Most notably it has no concept of frame duration (i.e. VFR content). This makes it impossible to implement e.g. a reliable IVTC filter in Avisynth because some HDTV broadcasts (like CBS) like to mix soft telecine and hard telecine and switch between the two all the time, which is impossible to handle in Avisynth. That's the primary reason why my experimental IVTC filter was done as part of ffdshow and not as an Avisynth filter (I tried Avisynth, and failed).
|
13th October 2011, 12:48 | #6160 | Link | ||
( ≖‿≖)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: BW, Germany
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have here a 1920x1080 video file that was encoded using BT.601 primaries (erroneously), but I want to play it back as such. No matter which setting I have the “decoding primaries” set to in the OSD, madVR always decodes using BT.709. In mplayer I can use -vo gl:colorspace=1 and it will use BT.601 to decode instead of the default, which results in the correct image.
__________________
Forget about my old .3dlut stuff, just use mpv if you want accurate color management Last edited by nand chan; 13th October 2011 at 12:51. |
||
Tags |
decoders, directshow, filters, splitter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|