Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
14th September 2005, 10:01 | #81 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 4
|
VST host
Hi Johnman,
First, thank you for your work. It is really a must have tool for everyone who does multichannel sound. I've read in the previous pages that you are working on a VST host feature ??? I make multichannel plugins (http://acousmodules.free.fr) and I wonder how it could be wonderful to use them inside Wavewizard ! Have you some beta version to test ? |
14th September 2005, 13:15 | #82 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
Have you some indepth knowledge about making vst's ? Im having a little problem with the implementation (of the host), and i could use some tips/pointers sometimes. (@ all Although im also busy with my study (currently i have to make a sort of a simple graphic card driver) ww is still being developed, but a little slower then before.)
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. |
|
14th September 2005, 16:16 | #83 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
I use Synthedit or other graphical environments, so I have not to deal with the basic codes... But perhaps could you see with Herman Seib : http://www.hermannseib.com/english/vsthost.htm or Tobias Fleischer (Toby Bear) : http://www.tobybear.de/developers.html They have free hosts and I'm sure that they can share some resources or tips. Perhaps could you send me an email (sonart@free.fr) when you will have made some progress with the VST host implementation ? Thanks ! |
|
16th September 2005, 10:57 | #84 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
And when i got a working beta host ill send you a mail. Im developing the host and ww seperate for now, so the first beta will probabely be only a hosting program. Later ill merge them together.
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. |
|
20th September 2005, 00:49 | #85 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Im experimenting a little with recoring from the soundcard and i noticed that somehow all regular samplerates can be used to record from the soundcard. Even my onboard soundcard can record at 192khz . Does this mean my soundcard can really support this samplerate natively, or is windows resampling. How can i find out what the real hardware suported samplerates are? (BTW cooledit also shows my onboard soundcard is capable of recording @ 192khz)
And here is a little screenshot of ww recording in simplemode if anyone is interested: screenie
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. |
20th September 2005, 06:52 | #86 | Link | |
Miles Freak
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 652
|
Quote:
-> There meanwhile lots of soundcards on the market which support multichannel input, so letīs feed them
__________________
CYA Daphy |
|
20th September 2005, 10:15 | #87 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
My soundcard has an option for 6 channel recording (and i already captured 6 channel audio from powerdvd (digitally) using krystal audio not to long ago) and i intend to support this in ww . Maybe i eventually create some sort of "virtual soundcard", so the output from ANY program can be recorded digitally using ww. But how and when the support comes, im not sure. Im trying to gather some good info on recording, but this isnt easy. The more support i get, the faster the development will go .
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. Last edited by johnman; 20th September 2005 at 10:42. |
|
20th October 2005, 00:41 | #89 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Unfortunately i still can not release a new version, but to the ppl that are interested in ww: Im pretty busy with other stuff, but i still i work on ww from time to time. Currently I've finished another rewrite on ww. I've totally changed the internal structure of ww. Now i just create a "sample-pipeline" @ runtime by simply connecting together several functions. What this means is that its possible to do i.e.:
upsample -> dither -> downsample -> vst -> downsample -> normalize -> amplify->channelmap->vst-> etc (not really usefull, but still possible) Previously the "sample-pipeline" was very static, and to support unlimited vst's was kind of difficult, so thats why the rewrite. Currently ive not made a GUI to configure it, so configuring is currently hardcoded in. But if i would make a GUI, ww will get similair functionality as bidule . This internal stuff will only be visible in the next release by the number of vst's which can be linked together (virtual unlimited), but the change is really much bigger then that. Any function or vst can be seperately configure and used as often as needed. Thats all for now .....
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. Last edited by johnman; 20th October 2005 at 00:47. |
25th October 2005, 01:56 | #91 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. Last edited by johnman; 25th October 2005 at 02:13. |
|
29th October 2005, 02:24 | #92 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Here is a screenshot of ww hosting a vst. NB notice the option to save as many configurations as you want for every vst. In the VI thread an idea was mentioned to add saving options to VI. When ww is used as a host, the settings can already be saved (and exchanged if needed).
screenshot
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. Last edited by johnman; 29th October 2005 at 02:26. |
29th October 2005, 17:39 | #94 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 729
|
Quote:
Regardless of the monitoring issue, this latest screen grab looks very good! Regards, Steve. |
|
30th October 2005, 11:18 | #95 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
Multichannel playback (and recording) will be supported . This is indeed a must have for ww if vst's are used. But i wont promise its already available in the next release .
johny
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. |
10th January 2006, 15:52 | #97 | Link |
Miles Freak
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 652
|
Hiho Johnman,
I tried something simple with conversation batcher simply: want to convert an existant WAV to MP3 with out any changes on the source file. Hmm -> I have to let wavewizard (at least) copy the file to another place, is it possible to feed cb directly or did I missed something
__________________
CYA Daphy |
13th January 2006, 00:06 | #98 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 212
|
sry daphy, this cant be done...
when you feed wavs to ww and ww accepts it you know you will get a vallid mp3. Its a bit more reliable, but also more time consuming... but i agree its not pretty, but what i actually want to do is to integrate cb in ww and just select output format in ww. Dont know how, but that would be a big improvent i think
__________________
If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|