Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
18th February 2005, 18:17 | #181 | Link |
Just One Calorie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 112
|
@Inwards
What is the "correct" behavior? I'll need to be writing the drop-frame thing soon. Also, did you get my PM regarding the source? When I compiled pulldown.exe the result exits abnormally after a a few GOPs on this source I have. Well I suppose it doesn't matter at this point, I've already set about writing a new stream parsing architecture. |
18th February 2005, 18:25 | #182 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Here is beta 4. It has normal 3:2 pulldown, a progress bar, and source code.
http://neuron2.net/dgpulldown/dgpulldown.html Now I'll catch up on the recent posts... EDIT: Duh, I don't need stream ID anymore. I'll get rid of it. EDIT2: Modified the link to beta 4. Last edited by Guest; 18th February 2005 at 18:39. |
18th February 2005, 18:49 | #183 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
Last edited by Guest; 18th February 2005 at 18:51. |
|
18th February 2005, 19:58 | #185 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
18th February 2005, 22:42 | #186 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 326
|
More stupid questions, sigh...
n2,
I appreciate the work you are doing on this, but I have a complete lack of understanding of avisynth and scripting (assuming I have some free time before I die, I might have to remedy that, but I'm pushing 40 this year and it's pushing back!!). All I need to use your pulldown program is a progressive, 720x480, 25 frame per second MPEG2 stream, correct? Tmpgenc can give me a progressive, 25fps, 720x480 mpeg2 video stream, so basically I shouldn't have to use avisynth (which I don't understand) correct? I'm not terribly concerned about a small loss in quality (or menus!). I'll try this tonight with a few short clips and see what happens. By the way, how fast is DGPulldown? |
18th February 2005, 22:47 | #187 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Land of the Long White Cloud
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
|
|
18th February 2005, 22:57 | #188 | Link | ||
Junior Slacker
Join Date: May 2004
Location: End-World
Posts: 296
|
Re: More stupid questions, sigh...
Quote:
DGPulldown is just about as fast as your hard drive. The frames themselves are not processed. Quote:
|
||
19th February 2005, 03:25 | #190 | Link | |||
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Re: More stupid questions, sigh...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
19th February 2005, 05:47 | #191 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 326
|
Ahh, video, you fickle b*tch...
I have been messing about tonight trying a few things.
I started with a PAL video stream, 720x576 (16:9), 25 fps, interlaced, and using tmpgenc ended up with an 'ntsc' video stream at 720x480, 25 fps, and progressive. I also created a second file the same as above with a framerate of 29.976 using tmpgenc. The file with the 25 fps framerate ran nice and smooth on the computer, while the file with the 29.976 framerate showed some jerkiness (tmpgenc would appear to duplicate every 5th frame or so to bump 25 fps up to 29.976 fps rather than alter the flags). I then took the 25 fps file and used DGPulldown (beta 4) and ended up with a third file, with a framerate of 29.976, and lo and behold it showed the same jerkiness as the one made with tmpgenc! Granted, using DGPulldown will give me a smaller file, and allow me a higher bitrate when encoding for a new ntsc dvd, but it does not appear to alter the look of the video itself, it still does not play smoothly. ( I have attached the tmpgenc profile that I used in case anyone is interested, it will have to be cleared by Mr. Moderator...) |
19th February 2005, 07:19 | #193 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 147
|
As you seem familiar with TMPGEnc, can you comment on the jerkiness of that encoder's mpv file when run through DGPulldown?
As I said, the mainconcept file has no jerkiness, but I'd prefer to use TMPGEnc as the quality looks slightly better to me. |
19th February 2005, 07:29 | #194 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
|
|
19th February 2005, 07:45 | #195 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 147
|
These are the settings that I used. Maybe jerkiness is the wrong word, it looks more like a low frame rate (say 12fps) when played in MPC or VLC.
EDIT: the previous list wasn't very easy to follow, so I replaced it with screenshots... Last edited by digidragon; 19th February 2005 at 15:42. |
19th February 2005, 15:40 | #197 | Link |
brainless
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,653
|
I cannot test DGPulldown here, because my TV is not able to display 60 Hertz.
Is DGPulldown fixed to a width of 720 pixels or are the other DVD-conform widths of 704 & 352 pixels possible, too? Can a SVCD contain rff-flags, too? (like DVD) And what about VCD? (certainly impossible)
__________________
Don't forget the 'c'! Don't PM me for technical support, please. |
19th February 2005, 16:14 | #198 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
@digidragon
I don't see any obvious problem. I can try with your source if you like. If it works smooth I'll give you my template that does it. @scharfis_brain DGPulldown doesn't care a wit about width, nor does he change it in any way. You can use anything you like as long as your authoring program is happy. SVCD is MPEG2 so it should theoretically be possible. |
19th February 2005, 16:41 | #200 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|