Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
7th November 2015, 20:26 | #34081 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 76
|
Yes.
With 3 devices in list (in that order): Samsung LE40B530 HDMI LG Display LP156WF4-SPB1 Dell 2707WFP when attached 1 and 2 - variable display="Samsung LE40B530 HDMI" always when attached 2 and 3 - variable display="LG Display LP156WF4-SPB1" always this script (in group created for dithering): if (display = "Samsung LE40B530 HDMI") "Samsung" elseif (display = "LG Display LP156WF4-SPB1") "LG" elseif (display = "Dell 2707WFP") "Dell" else "None" when only one device is active - variable is set right ("None" profile is never set actual) madVR right to detect actual device (devices use different bitdepth in Exclusive FS so it's easy to check in debug OSD, correctly detect exact display rate, etc), but not set right variable. |
7th November 2015, 22:27 | #34082 | Link | |||||||||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Good to hear we're all on the same page. So I've removed the sharpness option now and set it to the algo which produced the best results in my test (near to sharpness value 2, but not identical).
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I prefer SuperRes, but you decide. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ah, I understand. I only ever tested with 1 active device. Will add this to my to do list, maybe for next week end, not sure. |
|||||||||
7th November 2015, 22:31 | #34083 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
madVR v0.89.14 released
http://madshi.net/madVR.zip Code:
* added new "sharpen edges" algorithm * added new "crispen edges" algorithm (tamed FineSharp) * added new "thin edges" algorithm * added new "enhance detail" algorithm * removed SuperRes "radius" option (set to 0.66) * removed SuperRes "sharpness" option (set near to 2) * removed LumaSharpen "radius" option (set to 1.0) * removed LumaSharpen "clamp" option (set to 0.035) * removed "apply SuperRes first" option (set to true) * updated AdaptiveSharpen to 2015-11-05 (experimental) version * optimized "video size has changed" notifications to media player * optimized aspect ratio overriding API behaviour Try the 4 new algos and let me know what you think, and how they compare in your opinion to SuperRes/AdaptiveSharpen/LumaSharpen. FineSharp lovers, don't cry, the new "crispen edges" algo is a tweaked FineSharp version which doesn't ring and isn't as sensitive to noise, anymore. FineSharp haters, give the "crispen edges" algo a chance, maybe you'll like it now. Do we still need AdaptiveSharpen and/or LumaSharpen? |
7th November 2015, 22:37 | #34084 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Sounds like a wonderful thing.
Edit: Oh, there it is already. Quote:
But even without SuperRes and just NNEDI3 64, some aliasing can be "guessed", it just seems blurrier. Quote:
I agree, SuperRes takes away that "oil painting" look of NNEDI3 to a more naturalistic one (like super-xbr, but without the drawbacks). |
||
7th November 2015, 23:05 | #34085 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 141
|
Thx for the new version.
I have used finesharp up til now. Can I use the strength-setting from finesharp with the "crispen edges" algorithm (tamed FineSharp)? Meaning setting it to 1 og 1,5 or 2 i will get roughly the same amount of sharpening as I got from finesharp with the same setting.
__________________
http://hometheatersettings.com - how to setup htpc and more |
7th November 2015, 23:16 | #34086 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 141
|
BTW is there any consensus now on the best sharpening settings? I have a fast system and pretty much only watch blu-ray quality material.
__________________
http://hometheatersettings.com - how to setup htpc and more |
7th November 2015, 23:48 | #34091 | Link | |||||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
------- Forgot to mention: The new algos are not fully performance optimized yet. So don't put too much weight on their performance. Performance will probably improve at some point in the future. |
|||||
7th November 2015, 23:55 | #34093 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,127
|
Is is possible to add some documentation on what the sharpening shaders are supposed to do? The titles are less than useful.
Right now, the performance seems as follows: Low: Enhance Detail, LumaSharpen Medium: Crispen Edges, AdaptiveSharpen High: SuperRes, Sharpen Edges, Thin Edges
__________________
HOW TO - Set up madVR for Kodi DSPlayer & External Media Players Last edited by Warner306; 8th November 2015 at 00:03. |
8th November 2015, 00:07 | #34095 | Link | ||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
There are no presets atm. Presets, an expert/noob switch, documentation/manual, and all that kind of stuff will come when I release v1.0, but not before. No, sorry. Ah, ok. Quote:
Does it happen with all videos or just with some specific? Try videos with different properties, e.g. MPEG2 vs h264, interlaced vs progressive etc. Maybe I can see what's going on if you create a debug log. |
||
8th November 2015, 00:17 | #34096 | Link |
QB the Slayer
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 697
|
@madshi:
Is there any drawbacks to enabling all 4 of the new algo's? I have not tested yet, but they all sound great so I just clicked all 4. I will probably be watching some stuff tonight, so I will try and report findings after that. Just curious if madVR will imploded after enabling all 4 LOL QB
__________________
|
8th November 2015, 00:20 | #34097 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,812
|
Well, with your new sharpen algorithm things have changed a bit.
Could you please bring back the radius option for a build or two? I suppose with higher radius and new "sharpen edges", very decent results could be achieved. With "thin edges" the aliasing gets more visible, so there's really a good reason for higher radius when combining it with SR LL. Quote:
-leeperry's lighttower -your FineSharp testimage -my infamous cartoon picture I must say that I'm very convinced of the results so far. With the lighttower picture (1080p -> WQHD postresize) it's very noticeable that the brightness doesn't increase, unlike with Adaptive Sharpen. It also seems to look rather naturalistic, Adaptive Sharpen with high strength has that "oil painting" look. However, "sharpen edges" can't be set that strong. But such high values aren't needed anyway. The effect in cartoons is not very strong, but here does line thinning the main job anyway. "sharpen edges" shares the positive trait of Adaptive Sharpen to not boost ringing, which makes it also a good choice for non-optimal sources. I haven't tested the new features is image enhancement yet, but to me it seems they could totally replace Lumasharpen and Adaptive Sharpen. |
|
8th November 2015, 00:22 | #34099 | Link | ||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
No drawbacks at all. They don't seem to negatively impact each other.
Quote:
Quote:
Please do and let us know your results! Last edited by madshi; 8th November 2015 at 00:25. |
||
8th November 2015, 00:24 | #34100 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 182
|
Quote:
1.mkv shows the video just fine in 0.89.14 2.mkv black screen in 0.89.14 here's the log: http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php...13829934374187 |
|
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|