Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
28th November 2009, 20:39 | #1 | Link |
don't blame me!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 276
|
BD Rebuilder: Questions about performance, duration etc.
I want to build a new computer. Among other tasks I want to do avc-encoding with e.g. BD Rebuilder.
How long does a encoding job take on your systems? Could you post some results? (CPU, RAM, Settings, duration) Thank you in advance. Last edited by Hobojobo; 28th November 2009 at 20:45. |
28th November 2009, 20:54 | #2 | Link | |||
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
|||
29th November 2009, 20:00 | #3 | Link |
don't blame me!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 276
|
I finished a encoding job on my htpc:
AMD BE2350, 2x2.1 GHz, 2 GB Ram, WinXP (32bit) Swat, [01:57:17.029] , 15,2 GB, MPEG2, 1080p Settings: x264, High Quality, One Pass (CRF), Target BD-9, movie only Encoding Time: 20:00 h (!) |
29th November 2009, 20:49 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,997
|
@Hobojobo
For movie only on BD-9 I would expect "Better (Fast)" to provide reasonable results. You may also want to resize to 720 which would speed up encoding time considerably - at the expense of the resolution which you may however find to be still very adequate. |
29th November 2009, 22:37 | #5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 162
|
A couple of small added points. A quad core of the the same basic architecture and speed as a dual core will be approximately twice the speed. An AMD quad up against an Intel dual core such as the Wolfdale core won't deliver twice the speed. That being said a decent AMD quad core such as the X4 630 which cost less than a fast Intel dual core will be faster for reencoding because of X264's ability to use all 4 cores, and do it for less money.
__________________
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep." Scott Adams |
30th November 2009, 11:29 | #6 | Link |
don't blame me!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 276
|
@all: Thanks for the input.
I tend to get an AM3-Board with a Phenom II / 905e or similar. I hope, we can gather some results with different setups (hardware, settings) in this thread. Last edited by Hobojobo; 30th November 2009 at 11:31. |
30th November 2009, 11:41 | #7 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,460
|
Speed of different processors with x264: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520
The 3.0 version of this benchmark is only a week old, so there aren't that many results yet, but the 2.0 version has plenty of results and the order shouldn't change. |
1st December 2009, 02:01 | #8 | Link | ||
don't blame me!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
O.T. (sort of) Thanks for the link. I ran the 3.0 Test. I would like to share my test results. I tried to register. My email address is banned I tried to send a message to the admin but I can't. I cannot pass the image verification of the contact-us-form, 'cause I cannot see the image. Is it an Asian forum ? Are there characters shown, which my browser cannot show? Here are my results anyway: Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|