Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > Avisynth Usage
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th June 2014, 13:12   #1  |  Link
manolito
Registered User
 
manolito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3,079
ConvertFPS

Here is a question for the AviSynth gurus (Gavino, IanB, you know who you are...)

For converting a true progressive 30 fps clip to 25 fps I like the field based method from this post:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...303#post908303

Code:
AssumeTFF()
LanczosResize(720,576)
changefps(50)
separatefields()
selectevery(4,0,3)
weave
I suppose the result will be identical if I first duplicate every frame before the command ChangeFPS(50) like this:
Code:
interleave(last,last)
changefps(50)
But what if I use ConvertFPS? If I double the frame rate to 60 fps first and then use ConvertFPS to go down to 50 fps, will there be less blending compared to going directly from 30 to 50?


Just curious...

Cheers
manolito
manolito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2014, 16:48   #2  |  Link
colours
Registered User
 
colours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 308
Three fields out of every five will be clean; the remaining two will be blended. (Selecting those three clean fields and deinterlacing would recover the source, albeit with half vertical resolution.)

A normal ConvertFPS would result in four blended fields and only one clean field out of every five fields.
colours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st June 2014, 14:33   #3  |  Link
manolito
Registered User
 
manolito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3,079
Thanks colours for the explanation (even if I do not understand the math behind it... )

So my suspicion that the method which uses frame doubling before ConvertFPS gives better looking results with less blending was correct. Good to know.


Cheers
manolito
manolito is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.