Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
25th November 2019, 21:45 | #161 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Region 0
Posts: 1,436
|
And what does the XFASTEST x264/x265 test consist of?
Their data for x265 looks promising, but shows it's not faster in x264. Others show improvements in both (from Legit Reviews): Last edited by Stereodude; 25th November 2019 at 21:50. |
25th November 2019, 22:54 | #162 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
https://forum.pclab.pl/topic/1184884...FHD-Benchmark/ https://www.guru3d.com/files-details...1-1-64bit.html |
|
26th November 2019, 05:35 | #163 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
I personally feel no benchmark is valid unless they are using at least the slow preset. I will wait until I see someone running with those, like techpowerup did for the Ryzen 3700x and 3900x. Though they used time to encode, and did not give us the fps, nor the time of the actual clip they used. I really hate how no one properly benches encoding. Tell us how long the clip is, how many frames it has, and what type of media it is. I would honestly say using one of the test pattern clips, or even any of the open source/Creative Commons movies, like Tears of Steel. I mean how else are we the public supposed to replicate the results if we don't know what reviewers are using to test with.
|
26th November 2019, 08:50 | #164 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,348
|
Quote:
Thats why you keep benchmarks at least slightly opaque. If you want to do your own benchmarks, you need to make your own references to benchmark against.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
|
26th November 2019, 15:54 | #165 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
Even 3950X is extremely good in x265
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
27th November 2019, 02:23 | #166 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
|
And SVT-AV1 too
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1) HEVC decoding benchmarks H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all |
27th November 2019, 19:50 | #167 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 447
|
I know you can't compare setups, but how the heck did Tom's get such ridiculously faster numbers than Phoronix? Windows vs Linux shouldn't cause that much of a difference!
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...0x-3970x&num=8
__________________
____HTPC____ | __Desktop PC__
2.93GHz Xeon x3470 (4c/8t Nehalem) | 4.5GHz 1.24v dual-core Haswell G3258 Radeon HD5870 | Intel iGPU 2x2GB+2x1GB DDR3-1333 | 4x4GB DDR3-1600 |
27th November 2019, 20:17 | #168 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
|
27th November 2019, 20:35 | #169 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
|
Quote:
I think we must focus on relative performance for each test of Tom's and Phoronix regarding to Enc4. For example, in both tests of Enc4 the new Threadripper 32C is about two times faster than Core i9 18C and 2.5 to 3 times faster than previous gen Threadripper 32C. The absolute performance could probably be more important for those who actually use the specific AV1 encoder and not using it just for benchmarks.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1) HEVC decoding benchmarks H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all |
|
12th December 2019, 14:51 | #170 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Palmcoast of Norway
Posts: 363
|
So... i got access to a Lenovo SR630 with Epyc 7742 on at work now running RHEL 8.1. Any benchmarks u guys want me to run on it?
processor : 127 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 23 model : 49 model name : AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor stepping : 0 microcode : 0x830101c cpu MHz : 2332.947 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 128 |
12th December 2019, 17:49 | #171 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
Try running Sagitare's benchmark. https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=174393 It's a little old.
You could also run a 1080p or 4k benchmark of say Tears of Steel at CRF 18-20 and go from Placebo all the way to ultra fast (if you have time) Because this would be a real world workload and let people see the difference in each preset. |
18th December 2019, 23:14 | #172 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
18th December 2019, 23:42 | #174 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
21st January 2020, 01:33 | #176 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
If that's too long, do the good old Park Joy. You could use handbrake, or staxrip, your choice. No filtering, no extras, just let the presets do what they are supposed to. The reason I ask this is because I feel Atak's benchmark uses a preset that no one will use in real life, and every site that does benchmark it does not give us the length, frames, etc of the source they are using, which makes their benchmarks useless. By using these well known, open source/royalty free videos, the results can be properly compared with other processors, and results can be replicated. |
|
21st January 2020, 11:46 | #177 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 21st January 2020 at 16:11. |
|
21st January 2020, 17:16 | #178 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
Remember, this is a forum for the 1% of encoders and enthusiasts. Most people want archival quality of their encodes. I am sorry you feel offended by what I said about your benchmark, but in real world scenarios your benchmark doesn't hold up. For example on your benchmark it states my 2700 gets 21+ fps, which I've never EVER seen in encoding at slow or slower. Not even at medium have I seen it at that speed, and I run with a pretty bare command line. Benchmarks are supposed to be about real world performance, and no one who cares about quality would be using fast and higher presets. |
|
21st January 2020, 17:25 | #179 | Link | |
ffx264/ffhevc author
Join Date: May 2007
Location: /dev/video0
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
I'm not "blind" and use CRF 21 in 10-bits and it looks totally fine. In fact, I can't see a (major) difference between 21 and 18 or 19, except for the bitrate. I must be blind, then? |
|
21st January 2020, 17:59 | #180 | Link | |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
crowd_run_1080p50.yuv ducks_take_off_1080p50.yuv in_to_tree_1080p50.yuv old_town_cross_1080p50.yuv park_joy_1080p50.yuv Looks at this as worse case scenario. Besides, You are probably encoding at cropped 1920x800 resolution instead of full 1920x1080. This benchmark shows you what you can expect from CPU A vs CPU B. For example. Should I buy Ryzen 3950x or Intel core i9 10980xe. Do not look at raw numbers because it does not make sense. PS. 2700x gets 28 fps in my benchmark so be more precise next time ,ok?
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 21st January 2020 at 18:07. |
|
|
|