Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
25th December 2014, 19:56 | #27881 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
MPDN is a .NET based video player. It is similar to madVR only in that it uses the GPU to do high quality video rendering. It is not DirectShow based and its renderer cannot be used outside MPDN.
There are technological similarities so ideas implemented in MPDN can probably be implemented in madVR if they interest madshi. Recently Zachs has implemented an impressive but complex "Render Script" system for advanced shaders which hopefully can help inform more advanced shaders in madVR. madshi also gave Zachs hints during development. |
25th December 2014, 21:38 | #27882 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,121
|
What settings should i change to make it as fast as possible when seeking?
That's the only thing that frustrates me, EVR is perfect except for some things that's useful (smooth motion for example). I understand there is no way to make it as EVR without taking away everything, but you get the idea Tried some things myself, buffer, frames, queue. But can't seem to find any difference. |
25th December 2014, 22:13 | #27883 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
Simply turn off "delay playback start after seeking, too" under "delay playback start until render queue is full". With that off madVR is as fast as EVR when seeking, at least on my systems.
|
25th December 2014, 22:20 | #27884 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,121
|
None of those "delay" has been checked.
The difference is huge on my System, and i got a pretty fast one, i5 760 4ghz. EVR is super fast, i can click anywhere and it will play there imediatly on Audio, whgile Video get's delayed depending on Decoding. MadVR everything get's delayed, and by a much larger margin, it depends on the scenes though. |
25th December 2014, 23:24 | #27887 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have a fast GPU+CPU (Titan+5960X) and seeking while using madVR feels as instant as EVR does. |
||
27th December 2014, 04:48 | #27889 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 93
|
I'm in the process of setting up my htpc for madVR. Instead of sticking to a regular player such as mpc, I'd love to switch to a more mediacenter like alternative, such as xbmc/kodi. however, do any of these even work with madVR?
|
27th December 2014, 08:01 | #27891 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 179
|
Indeed, as far as I know, XBMC's internal player does not support madVR, but you can set XBMC to use an external player for media files, and it will be up to that player to work out what to use (so if you set it to use MPC and you have MPC set to use madVR, madVR will be used).
|
27th December 2014, 16:32 | #27892 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
|
|
27th December 2014, 17:58 | #27894 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
28th December 2014, 09:51 | #27897 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
Think I'm going to revert to an older Nvidia driver, as I've never seen this before. Don't see how it's madvr's fault. EDIT: Reverted to 344.75 WHQL drivers, and everything's perfect again. Last edited by Hprd; 28th December 2014 at 10:23. |
28th December 2014, 10:05 | #27898 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,121
|
In an update to the slow seeking i have.
I notice that if the content is MPEG-2 it's fast like EVR, but with H264 it's much slower. The decoding should be slower of course, but i can't think that it's that much slower as EVR uses the same decoding as MadVR (which is software for me as i don't use DXVA or QS). |
28th December 2014, 15:19 | #27899 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 38
|
I have a question with LAV and madVR.
I noticed in LAV, there's already a Random Order Dithering option. Should I disable dithering in madVR? Same with deinterlacing. I already have Adaptive Deinterlacing enabled in LAV, should I disable it completely in madVR? What's the difference in quality/performance between them? |
28th December 2014, 15:48 | #27900 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 753
|
You should use MadVR's dithering. Dithering should be done as the very last step. LAV only has dithering for when it needs to convert to a different colour space, but it's generally better to let MadVR handle the conversions.
|
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|