Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > DVD & BD Rebuilder

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26th March 2004, 17:52   #1  |  Link
Cholerabob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Difference with CCe-Rejig-Quenc in DVD-RB ??

Ok i'm no purist so what's the difference between these software when ripping? Any quality change ? I know CCe does multipasses but do the others do it to ?

Thanks for illuminating me and showing me the way out of the darkness of low level 1 clicks (DVDShrink).
Cholerabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2004, 18:10   #2  |  Link
Nic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,285
This is pretty much a "what's best" thread, which is against forum rules.

But basically, ReJig is for speed and for when only needing to compress a little, CCE is for maximum quality and QuEnc is for people that can't afford CCE, want a free solution, and those who dont mind testing something in development.

Best to leave it there, experiment with all of them to see which suits your needs.

-Nic
Nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2004, 18:24   #3  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 21,095
Re: Difference with CCe-Rejig-Quenc in DVD-RB ??

Quote:
Originally posted by Cholerabob
Ok i'm no purist so what's the difference between these software when ripping? Any quality change ? I know CCe does multipasses but do the others do it to ?

Thanks for illuminating me and showing me the way out of the darkness of low level 1 clicks (DVDShrink).
Here's a rundown:

1. ReJig is a transcoder that does within-the-compressed-domain transcoding through requantization (I think the new version Nic is working does more). It does a very good job if there isn't a lot of compression. It is by far the fastest choice. There is no reason to do multiple passes on a transcoder because the bit allocation was already done on the original material.

2. QuEnc is a product that Nic has put together based on the FFMPEG engine. FFMEG is an open development for MPEG encoding so there is a lot of rapid improvements being made. The advantage is that it is free and does a decent job of encoding from scratch with an AVS file as input. It supports two pass encoding.

3. CCE is a commercial product. It is (in my opinion) the highest quality general purpose MPEG encoder on the market today. I've compared it to pretty much everything else -- and it doesn't get any better than CCE. It used to be incredibly expensive. But not long ago the company started offering a "Basic" version for $59. It does multiple pass encoding. It is very, very fast for an MPEG encoder -- but fast is a relative term... and it still takes quite a while.
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2004, 18:28   #4  |  Link
jdobbs
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 21,095
Quote:
Originally posted by Nic
This is pretty much a "what's best" thread, which is against forum rules.

But basically, ReJig is for speed and for when only needing to compress a little, CCE is for maximum quality and QuEnc is for people that can't afford CCE, want a free solution, and those who dont mind testing something in development.

Best to leave it there, experiment with all of them to see which suits your needs.

-Nic
Don't want to look like I'm contradicting you... I think we were typing at the same time..
__________________
Help with development of new apps: Donations.
Website: www.jdobbs.net
jdobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2004, 19:10   #5  |  Link
Cholerabob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Sorry if my post seemed to look for a what's best, but i was refering to the choices available in DVD-RB, and what were there propreties. Sincee i am experiencing problems when using CCe (Error 380, even if i use all the steps one by one)as my choice method, i wanted to know what were the others.

Thanks for the info.
Cholerabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2004, 03:54   #6  |  Link
djan
- DVDRB User -
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brussels - Belgium
Posts: 430
QuEnc gives very good quality comparable to CCE and it is going to be better and better, you can trust me. Use it if you have problems with CCE.
__________________
- CaN -
djan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.