Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
26th March 2004, 17:52 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
|
Difference with CCe-Rejig-Quenc in DVD-RB ??
Ok i'm no purist so what's the difference between these software when ripping? Any quality change ? I know CCe does multipasses but do the others do it to ?
Thanks for illuminating me and showing me the way out of the darkness of low level 1 clicks (DVDShrink). |
26th March 2004, 18:10 | #2 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,285
|
This is pretty much a "what's best" thread, which is against forum rules.
But basically, ReJig is for speed and for when only needing to compress a little, CCE is for maximum quality and QuEnc is for people that can't afford CCE, want a free solution, and those who dont mind testing something in development. Best to leave it there, experiment with all of them to see which suits your needs. -Nic |
26th March 2004, 18:24 | #3 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 21,095
|
Re: Difference with CCe-Rejig-Quenc in DVD-RB ??
Quote:
1. ReJig is a transcoder that does within-the-compressed-domain transcoding through requantization (I think the new version Nic is working does more). It does a very good job if there isn't a lot of compression. It is by far the fastest choice. There is no reason to do multiple passes on a transcoder because the bit allocation was already done on the original material. 2. QuEnc is a product that Nic has put together based on the FFMPEG engine. FFMEG is an open development for MPEG encoding so there is a lot of rapid improvements being made. The advantage is that it is free and does a decent job of encoding from scratch with an AVS file as input. It supports two pass encoding. 3. CCE is a commercial product. It is (in my opinion) the highest quality general purpose MPEG encoder on the market today. I've compared it to pretty much everything else -- and it doesn't get any better than CCE. It used to be incredibly expensive. But not long ago the company started offering a "Basic" version for $59. It does multiple pass encoding. It is very, very fast for an MPEG encoder -- but fast is a relative term... and it still takes quite a while. |
|
26th March 2004, 18:28 | #4 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 21,095
|
Quote:
|
|
26th March 2004, 19:10 | #5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
|
Sorry if my post seemed to look for a what's best, but i was refering to the choices available in DVD-RB, and what were there propreties. Sincee i am experiencing problems when using CCe (Error 380, even if i use all the steps one by one)as my choice method, i wanted to know what were the others.
Thanks for the info. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|