Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
25th April 2017, 20:48 | #1781 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 311
|
Feature request alternate output
Hi jdobbs,
I did a lot of MP4s lately with great success. All problems I had with previous versions are gone. Many thanks for that in the first place. I came accross 2 feature requests while doing them: 1. Output MP4Box commandline to a textfile in WORKFILES folder for reviewing similar to LASTCMD.TXT. Reason: Sometimes alternate outputs are out of sync because of leading malformed clips in multipart sources. The commandline could easily be used to run MP4Box from CMD later. 2. Option not to delete final .264 file that is passed to MP4Box. Reason: In case of multipart sources BD-RB creates a VIDxxx+VIDyyy.264 file that is deleted after muxing. In case I need to run MP4Box again I'd like to keep the file in WORKFILES Many thanks for thinking about my wishes :-) ggtop |
11th May 2017, 10:59 | #1782 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
|
Feature request upspeed BD to PAL
Hi jdobbs,
what an amazing piece of software! - Thank You very much! I have a feature request that would be great I think (especially for the folks in europe): Could You implement the possibility to speedup the whole BD to PAL including a higher pitch of the soundtrack? The Problem is, that a lot of movies here in europe are in 23/24 fps too, but mostly the pitch of the dubbed soundtracks is slowed down and therefore the pitch is lowered. To a lot of movie fans I have talked to (including me) this sounds very weird (like a to slow record player) - and it ruins the joy of watching the movie. So this was always a KO criterium for me, to buy a BD. I saw, that clownBD can do the job - but only for the main title of the BD - and without menues ... If this would work for the whole BD including the menues this would just be AMAZING! :-) Thank You very much! |
7th October 2017, 13:32 | #1784 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 590
|
With the UHD encryption seemingly overcome, and a Russian company selling software to back up your discs (along with recommendations on drives), would it be possible to add functionality to re-encode them to fit on a bd-50? The structure appears the same as standard blu ray discs.
|
7th October 2017, 16:53 | #1786 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 590
|
The fact that they have done 30 to 40 titles indicates that it is no longer secure - the fact that it isn't 'automatic' doesn't mean it's not cracked, just that it requires manual intervention from those in the know. If they haven't got access to discs from other regions (they're Russian) then they may not be able to do those. The relatively high price of the software does seem to indicate that they need funds to obtain the discs to implement it. However, from a disc every month being 'cracked' it's now become a couple a week, so I think, given the fact that they've gone public / commercial, that the database might grow quickly, and it might be possible for them to get information from unsupported discs via the software to be able to crack it remotely.
|
7th October 2017, 18:45 | #1789 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,368
|
'no longer secure' implies being cracked, and in turn affects globally. I said, all titles here after others said it on RedFox forums. The fact that RedFox doesn't do it yet is irrelevant. I'm impartial, I don't even have any 4k gear except maybe one of my PC drives. I just look at it from all sides. No more, no less. I don't care who fully cracks or completely, as users are entitled to make fair use backups. Whether it's with RedFox software, elby, deuhd, dvdfab or another...
Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk |
7th October 2017, 20:16 | #1790 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 590
|
I appreciate this - it's rather like the dvdfab cinavia removal - it appears that the software contains information for each supported release, or can 'phone home'. What you're saying is that a piece of software can't figure out how to decrypt any disc, but that's rather by-the-way compared to saying that the encryption hasn't been cracked. Quite clearly the existence of 30+ images without encryption show that it has been cracked, but that so far they haven't been able to code the software to do it automatically. I haven't got a clue how its done, but say, for instance, that they found a uhd drive which could be hacked to reveal the key. They wouldn't want to release this information, but would need to play every different disc on this drive to get the key to add to the database.
|
7th October 2017, 21:58 | #1791 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,368
|
No it hasn't. Feel free to check the current deuhd thread on RedFox forum. Aacs uses AES 2 I think Pete said, which was very secure in some 'timing' or something. That said, the INDICATION that there's at least a partial breakthrough on the uhd decryption is something I welcome and will continue to follow until it's completely cracked. Then things can really take off for consumer fair use backups.
Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk |
9th October 2017, 23:07 | #1793 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
|
|
10th October 2017, 13:11 | #1794 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Have you tried that version and it has failed? Or do you just mean they should be tested and set as the recommended version? Any particular advantages it has over the recommended version?
Last edited by jdobbs; 10th October 2017 at 13:13. |
10th October 2017, 13:32 | #1795 | Link |
Suspended for forum rule violations
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
|
Hi jdobbs!
No, havn't tried that LAVfilters version yet, but will do when I have a new BD-RB project. I will let you know then if any audio sync issues appear, maybe all is OK? I use PotPlayer together with madVR and that is the only reason I have installed the latest LAVfilters. Recently found out that MPC-HC uses it's own internal 0.70.2 LAVfilters so maybe I will drop PotPlayer. I kind of like the GUI of PotPlayer though. Edit: I have to say it's a bit confusing for me with filters and all available settings in media players. Just trying to get the most out of it, they call me Hawkeye for a reason... Last edited by varekai; 10th October 2017 at 13:43. Reason: . |
14th October 2017, 11:06 | #1799 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|