Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > VirtualDub, VDubMod & AviDemux

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd November 2005, 18:41   #1  |  Link
redbull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4
DeInterlace

Hi all !!

I'm having trouble with this video empty.
As you can see, at the end, (high motion) it's getting worste...
Src file was in Divx format (unknown), now It's a Xvid file + Crop.
I'm using VirtualDub 1.6.11. Deinterlace filter (internal) didn't help.
Is there a way to get a better quality ?
Thank you !
RedBull

Last edited by redbull; 4th November 2005 at 17:34. Reason: problem solved, http link disable
redbull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 18:49   #2  |  Link
stephanV
gone
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,706
Is this the source video?

If so, this clip is already resized, so you cant deinterlace anymore because field information is destroyed by that. I think this is a lost cause...
stephanV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 19:03   #3  |  Link
redbull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4
The source file is in Divx format 480*576. I don't know if it's coming
from TV or Dvd rip but I've the same problem on the source.
Lost cause ?
redbull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 19:51   #4  |  Link
setarip_old
Registered User
 
setarip_old's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,267
Hi!

Quote:
The source file is in Divx format 480*576.
Sounds like your source isn't the original either. Resolution indicates original was likely a PAL SVCD

Quote:
I don't know if it's coming from TV or Dvd rip
I'd suggest you RE-read the rules of these forums...
setarip_old is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 19:53   #5  |  Link
stephanV
gone
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,706
Post a piece of the source. It doesn't do any good to see how you messed up the sample.
stephanV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 20:13   #6  |  Link
redbull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4
To setarip_old : i guess u'r refering to rule n°6 ? this documentary has already been
broadcasted on my tv network several times.
Here is a sample of the source : empty

Last edited by redbull; 4th November 2005 at 17:34.
redbull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2005, 20:30   #7  |  Link
scharfis_brain
brainless
 
scharfis_brain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,653
how can that AVI be the source after capturing?

The interlacing is probably an editing error. You can't get rid of it. it is too bold.
__________________
Don't forget the 'c'!

Don't PM me for technical support, please.
scharfis_brain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2005, 11:21   #8  |  Link
mod
keep manzo
 
mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence, IT
Posts: 528
Hi. I don't think this is a lost cause.
Try VDub with those filters:

Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
[ Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4
Vertical Smoother 0.3: stregth 4 ]
Brightness/Cotrast: contrast 125%

This reduces the "interlaced" effect a lot, but reduces contrast too.
Use the last two smoothers if you still want to reduce the "lines" and you don't care about the loss of contrast.

I've processed your sample with all 8 vertical smoothers, saved with latest XviD build @900 kbps and the result is quite good, considered the source.
I don't think you are interested in codec settings so I'm not going to post them here.
mod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2005, 11:22   #9  |  Link
mod
keep manzo
 
mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence, IT
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by mod
I've processed your sample
I was meaning the test2.avi file.
mod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2005, 11:28   #10  |  Link
scharfis_brain
brainless
 
scharfis_brain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,653
you will loose A LOT, I mean a LOT detail by doing so.

I'd say: just leave it as it is. Probably this was a wished 'effect'...
__________________
Don't forget the 'c'!

Don't PM me for technical support, please.
scharfis_brain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2005, 11:35   #11  |  Link
mod
keep manzo
 
mod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence, IT
Posts: 528
Sure there's a LOT of detail loss, but if his objective is to reduce the lines, I don't see any other way to do that..
mod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th November 2005, 13:45   #12  |  Link
redbull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4
Thanks everyone !
mod's method is perfect for me.
Bye
redbull is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.