Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > Avisynth Usage

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15th April 2015, 22:22   #21  |  Link
luquinhas0021
The image enthusyast
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 270
I guess Spline 100 (5 taps) is better than nnedi3_rpow2, because is more sharper and faster than nnedi3.
luquinhas0021 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2015, 22:32   #22  |  Link
Groucho2004
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by luquinhas0021 View Post
I guess Spline 100 (5 taps) is better than nnedi3_rpow2, because is more sharper and faster than nnedi3.
You can't have your cake and eat it too:
Sharper algorithms -> more artefacts

Ultimately it's your decision what you can live with.
__________________
Groucho's Avisynth Stuff
Groucho2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2015, 22:44   #23  |  Link
luquinhas0021
The image enthusyast
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 270
It's not like this! Algorithms that use Edge detection doesn't have artifacts, sometimes, and are sharpers.

Last edited by luquinhas0021; 15th April 2015 at 22:50.
luquinhas0021 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2015, 02:57   #24  |  Link
colours
Registered User
 
colours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 308
Quote:
Originally Posted by luquinhas0021 View Post
It's not like this! Algorithms that use Edge detection doesn't have artifacts, sometimes, and are sharpers.
That's only true on the assumption that the edge detection is perfect.
__________________
Say no to AviSynth 2.5.8 and DirectShowSource!
colours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2015, 16:01   #25  |  Link
luquinhas0021
The image enthusyast
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 270
Explain

Colours, explain me what oy wannted say when you said perfect Edge Detection. Perfect in what sense: all edges detection or none artifact detection?
luquinhas0021 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2015, 05:04   #26  |  Link
colours
Registered User
 
colours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 308
Perfect in the sense that it detects all the edges and only the edges.

This is obviously not a well-posed problem because (in the context of photography) the projection from three dimensions to two is lossy, not to mention that things sometimes don't even have hard, defined edges. Also, Moiré patterns tend to mess with edge detectors.

It's simply not possible for an upscaling algorithm to be free of artifacts in every case. (Unless the input is bandlimited and sampling theorem etc.)

Not that this is all too relevant to the thread; if I'm not mistaken (though I very well might be), using a neural network approach to upscaling is more like solving a maximum likelihood problem than doing explicitly edge-directed interpolation. It's probably not entirely accurate to call nnedi3 an "EDI" type of algorithm, for example. The edge-directedness is an emergent property, not something inherent to how it works.
__________________
Say no to AviSynth 2.5.8 and DirectShowSource!

Last edited by colours; 18th April 2015 at 05:07.
colours is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
neurondoubler, nnedi3, upscaling

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.