Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
21st January 2007, 01:11 | #81 | Link |
Turkey Machine
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lowestoft, UK (but visit lots of places with bribes [beer])
Posts: 1,953
|
Bad move foxy, VC SP1's only really necessary if you do a lotta 64-bit programming, and it's a space hogger too. (Read Avery Lee's blog at virtualdub.org and you'll find out more.)
__________________
On Discworld it is clearly recognized that million-to-one chances happen 9 times out of 10. If the hero did not overcome huge odds, what would be the point? Terry Pratchett - The Science Of Discworld |
21st January 2007, 01:24 | #82 | Link |
*****
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,647
|
I tried compiling lavc with ICL, but it gives errors in 'opt.c', 'imgconvert.c' and 'dv.c'. The same errors are present when compiling with plain MSVC2003.
__________________
MPC-HC 2.2.1 |
21st January 2007, 08:34 | #83 | Link |
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
I know, I should uninstall SP1 and reinstall ICL fresh, but I'm sort of fed up with it at the moment. Soon.
Odd thing I noticed: VMR9 mixer mode prevents queue now. I'm pretty sure it was working before, but none of the old builds I tested works, so maybe I'm just absent minded. Didn't update anything related to it as far as I know. I don't remember the benefit anyway, so I'll just leave it off. Devil pointed out to me that ICL and ICC aren't the same engine. Silly me, I should have known, but Intel's documentation hints toward the opposite. Too bad, it'd be much easier that way. Last edited by foxyshadis; 22nd January 2007 at 11:22. |
22nd January 2007, 07:03 | #84 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
|
Good evening gentlemen.
I wanted to start by thanking you for carrying on the development of ffdshow. I came across ffdshow when I joined the AVS forums when I became interested in building a serious HTPC + home theatre. In time I came to realize that regardless of the hardware that was used, a few essential pieces of software were regularly used and highly praised. ZoomPlayer ffdshow Mediaplayer Classic etc... Although I have gone through many pieces of hardware and software, ffdshow has always been the first thing I install on any machine I setup. Be it my machines or friends PC's that are having problems playing audio or video files. Thank you for all the work you do. ffdshow is always evolving thanks to the dedication of passionate people like the ones @ doom9 and abroad. Now, when I watch DVDs, satellite tv, listening to my CD's or my mp3's I always know that I am getting the best possible sound & video quality thanks to a hand full of well written software applications, plugins & codecs. I do have 1 feature request for ffdshow. This is not a major problem for me but I think it may go a long way towards making the use & configuration of ffdshow a little easier. Would it be possible to make the audio & video configuration panel of ffdshow resizable I realize that codec performance and quality are of the greatest importance, but as a person that constantly uses the config panels I find it a pain sometimes to have to scroll up and down to select the various sections I want to configure. I understand that I could just remove the filters from the left panel so that only the ones I need are visible. But this is not always the best option as I sometimes forget I have removed a filter or a Preset profile loads up depending on my application and I spend a lot of time trying to remember what I did that caused the filter to disappear. If making the audio / video configuration panels resizable is too much effort to accomplish, then please forgive my ignorance as I am not well versed in writing code for applications. Thanks you for you time and consideration. I appreciate all the hard work you guys put into making ffdshow the best application that it ca be. Have a good day. eric g. P.S. Damn, I registered on the forum just to say that and I still had to wait 5 days just to make my 1st post. |
22nd January 2007, 12:50 | #85 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,560
|
Hello, fatchick1o9.
Interesting request, to make vertical size resizable is not an impossible thing. But it may not be easy to code (not too difficult though). I would like to prioritize debuging and documentation over feature requests. I may reconsider when I have finished debuging and documentation, but please do not expect too much, because they are almost endless. |
22nd January 2007, 13:24 | #86 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
|
Thanks Mr. Yamagata. Your work on the Queueing and SMP is something I follow more closely than anything else.
I recently put together an AMD 64x2 with dual FX7600GT's specifically for using ffdshow's queuing. I figured that the development team had other priorities but as the saying goes "The squeaky wheel gets the grease". Well I am just waiting to get lubed up. eric g. Last edited by fatchick1o9; 22nd January 2007 at 13:31. |
23rd January 2007, 04:44 | #88 | Link |
Didée Fan
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,079
|
May I ask if it's possible to update the deinterlacers in the deinterlace tab ?
Some of them don't work, and the one that does work, tomsmocomp, causes artifacts when used. Specifically, I'm asking if Tomsmocomp deinterlacer can be updated, please. Here's tbarries web page. You can look to see if you have the latest version of Tomsmocomp, please. Link Last edited by Jeremy Duncan; 23rd January 2007 at 04:47. Reason: added the link |
23rd January 2007, 10:36 | #89 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 55
|
Hi guys,
I am very happy with FFDSHOW there is just one request for me regarding 4:3 material on my 16:9 screen. http://www3.impacthosting.com/trbarry/HDTV.htm So if I may be so bold and request this :-) Again thanks a ton for your hard work. Corona |
23rd January 2007, 11:47 | #90 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12
|
I too have mused over the resizable config idea. For about 2 years infact... I even went and hacked together a small script to force the window to be resizable - however that was purely thru the window management... so it would randomly crash and burn... still - I think it would be a pretty neat thing to throw in
Keep going guys, ffdshow is looking great at the moment |
23rd January 2007, 12:15 | #91 | Link | |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
Quote:
Displaying them any other way, by distorting their shape is "just plain wrong".... Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
Last edited by SeeMoreDigital; 23rd January 2007 at 20:37. |
|
23rd January 2007, 14:57 | #92 | Link | |
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
Quote:
Code:
converttoyuy2().WarpedResize(m(2,width*1.15),height,.7,1).converttoyv12() ratio=16.0/9.0 bordersize=int(height*ratio-width) bordersize > 0 ? colorborders(bordersize) : last function colorborders(clip c, int bordersize) { global border1 = int(bordersize / 4) * 2 global border2 = bordersize - border1 global colory = 0 global clp = c temp = c.addborders(bordersize,0,0,0) scriptclip(temp,""" overlay(blankclip(last,color_yuv=colory),clp,x=border1) """) FrameEvaluate("colory = int(AverageLuma())*65536+int(AverageChromaU())*256+int(AverageChromaV())") } function m(int r, float x, string "type") { return x<16 ? 16 : int(round(x/float(r))*r) } Further ambience effects are possible, but this functions as a proof of concept only. I don't especially care for the effect. |
|
23rd January 2007, 16:42 | #94 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 55
|
Well...plain wrong might be a bit strong. Sure it changes the image but so do many other filters in ffdshow. If it enhances peoples enjoyment why not add them?
The script sounds awesome, I'll give this a try when I get home. Thanks alot for putting it together. Looking from how little code (well script) it seems to be in avisynth does it mean that it would be possible to introduce this into ffdshow? Does nobody want their 4:3 content being displayed as efficiently as possible (even if loosing a bit of original image) on their 16:9 screen? Regarding the "black" frame average colorisation, perhaps this would be even better if each side would only take into account its respective, let's say 1/3, of the image? I'm sure this would need to by tried and depends alot on the user's subjective preferences probably. Some people might even find it highly distracting. Edit: after trying the script I get an error: "There is no function WarpedResize". When I take out the line though the black borders get their averaged colores nicely! Last edited by the_corona; 23rd January 2007 at 17:29. |
23rd January 2007, 18:41 | #95 | Link | |
*****
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,647
|
Quote:
http://ffdshow-tryout.sourceforge.net/html/en/faq.htm
__________________
MPC-HC 2.2.1 |
|
23rd January 2007, 22:53 | #97 | Link | |||
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
23rd January 2007, 23:57 | #98 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
used sample (58MB) Thanks |
|
24th January 2007, 00:17 | #99 | Link |
Fun Lovin' Criminal
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
Which one of the developers makes ICL SSE builds? It is clearly superior when xsharpen is enabled and competitive w/ ICL9 when enabling denoise3D, at least according to wyrd's numbers.
Edit: Oh I get it. You have to download the package from clsid at mytempdir and then rename the ffdshow.ax version that you need. Finally, copy it into the ffdshow root folder overwriting the current ffdshow.ax file. I'll be using ICL9 SSE because I have an overclocked xp mobile CPU and I use all those filters. Last edited by F_L_C; 24th January 2007 at 00:34. |
24th January 2007, 00:37 | #100 | Link |
*****
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,647
|
If there are enough positive test results, then I probably will enable SSE by default for my ICL builds. SSE vs SSE2 doesn't seem to make much difference.
Denoise3d does not gain much from optimizations, while xsharpen gains a lot. More tests with other filters are greatly appreciated.
__________________
MPC-HC 2.2.1 |
Tags |
ffdshow, ffdshow tryouts, ffdshow-mt, ffplay, icl |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|