Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
9th June 2003, 19:58 | #21 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 159
|
For what it's worth, here's how it looks on free to air broadcast TV in Australia. This frame is from a SD PAL capture (I just thought I'd throw in a frame that has the hi-def banner as a dig :-) ).
While there are faults on TV in Australia, generally the colour rendering is accurate. Oh yeah, this has been unpacked from a divx to fit on a 700Mb CD, so its a little blurred. http://www.users.on.net/alfalfa/enterprise0.bmp |
14th June 2003, 09:33 | #23 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 159
|
leo, that was an analogue capture, but there are a few cards for .au now, check out www.dba.org.au forums
|
14th June 2003, 15:34 | #25 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 299
|
@ all..
wow.. what a jip !! I just found out that ST Enterprise that they air in our area here in NY (I'm sure in others too) are NOT in widescreen !! !! !! It's in FULLSCREEN and they cover the top and bottom of the video w/ black bars aka, letterbox. Ok, how did I come accross that finding ?? Simple. I've done many 16:9 endcodes (via DVD rip) as such: * I cut the boarders off, as I usually do w/ true 16:9 final encodes. * I the encoded w/ IN(16:9) and OUT(16:9) ..and the final result was squished people PLEASE NOTE: I've done this save route before!! And, I've gotten true 16:9 (not squished people) I guess I found a way to truely tell if what stations are airing, that is claiming to be a given format ie, 16:9 (ok, they say, "letterbox" for ST E) that if following a tipically used process to reproduce a final 16:9 output, you final result should be true. But, if after following this same process, you find your video (or people) squished, then someone is falsifying their statement (to a degree) UPN (via Satellite) is one of them. Ok, if you encode to a final 4:3, then you are ok. You encoding a 4:3 project. But, if you are trying to encode for a true 16:9 project for future 16:9 TV (or perhaps you already have one) then you are in for trouble w/ these faked letterboxed shows. I'm shocked. Unless it was just this one show that was faked. I don't know. I have to do more testing, and try other ST E shows that I still have ton miniDV tapes. Then again, my process could be wrong for these TV captures. Well, I'm still shocked I will play around some more w/ this. I've done DVD rips that were letterboxed, but with 4:3 ratios. ie, "Event Horizon" is in this format. And, my final 16:9 is true 16:9, after performing the same steps I laid out, in my above notes. I cutted the top/bottom bars and encoded as: IN(16:9) and OUT(16:9) and result equiald true 16:9 !! Well, on to more testings. Later guys. -vhelp
__________________
ESC K7S5A / XP 1800+ / Windows 98 ADVC-100[dvio] / WTVGO[avio] / DC10+[avio] / Canon ZR-10 / Delphi 6 Personal / JVC S-VHS HR-S3910U / Durabrand SSS w/ DVD Player STS75E / Sony TRV-22 FithElement/Dogma/BladeRunner/Contact |
10th July 2003, 02:00 | #26 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
Code:
Levels (21,0.989,255,0,255) Code:
SetMemoryMax(40) LoadPlugin("C:\...\DecombLegacy.dll") LoadPlugin("C:\...\MJPEGcorrect.dll") AVISource("capture.avi") #--Enterprise Settings #--------------------------- #--Crop/IVTC/Color Settings #crop(6,62,708,362) #Telecide(post=false).Decimate() #Levels (21,0.989,255,0,255)#--Darker #Levels (11,0.994,255,0,255)#--Lighter #---------------------------- #--Resize Settings #LanczosResize(352,192)#--Lo_Qual_DivX #LanczosResize(672,362).Addborders(0,3,0,3)#--Hi_Qual_DivX #LanczosResize(352,176).Addborders(0,32,0,32)#--VCD #Addborders(6,59,6,59)#4:3--DVD #LanczosResize(720,480)#16:9--DVD #LanczosResize(852,480)#16:9--DVD Simulation #--Voyager Settings #---------------------------- #--Crop/IVTC/Color Settings #crop(6,8,712,468) #Telecide(post=false) #Decimate() #Levels (21,0.989,255,0,255)#--Darker #Levels (11,0.994,255,0,255)#--Lighter #---------------------------- #--Resize Settings #LanczosResize(352,256)#--Lo_Qual_DivX #LanczosResize(352,240)#--VCD #LanczosResize(640,480)#--Hi_Qual_DivX #Addborders(4,6,4,6)#4:3--DVD Last edited by neo_sapien; 10th July 2003 at 02:02. |
|
17th July 2003, 06:37 | #27 | Link |
The Digital Soul
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nebraska, USA
Posts: 114
|
I don't really have a set level I go with. I just run about 2% of the video through VirtualDub's Levels Filter to determine where I should adjust the levels. With Enterprise since most of the show happens in low light sometimes you just have to search around the episode to find the brightest and darkest points and take level measurements from there.
|
4th August 2003, 13:23 | #28 | Link |
avatar doesn't support IE
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Great Southland
Posts: 2,238
|
sorry, had to dig this thread up for bragging
http://www9.brinkster.com/sportschoo...terprise-1.jpg if it comes up with an error, just hit refresh, im still working out the best way to get around the remote linking protection. only question is why do they put up the 'available in HD' message when you are watching the HD version? btw, i have a few more caps (the cgi looks very nice in HD) but need to clear up some hosting space first. just a couple more caps (the 3rd one is from the Demo loop that ch9 plays when there isnt HD content avaialable), http://www9.brinkster.com/sportschook/?9hd-csi-1.jpg http://www9.brinkster.com/sportschook/?9hd-csi-2.jpg http://www9.brinkster.com/sportschook/?9hd-loop-1.jpg Enf... [edit] http://www9.brinkster.com/sportschoo...terprise-5.jpg [/edit]
__________________
Sometimes I get halfway through a paragraph explaining something, then I just completely forget what I was thinking about which is when you will notice that the paragraph just ends rather abruptly... Last edited by auenf; 4th August 2003 at 13:34. |
4th August 2003, 23:47 | #29 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 299
|
Hi auenf
Quote:
Quote:
we capture it, and to keep up from doing what we do, if at all anything, it's a form of nag/revenge tackticts or something like that. They dont' want us to have as good as source quality as theirs. I guess they feel that we can obtain the same level quality output as their I had my suspicions, and... Hey, even after it being HD quality and all, I can STILL see them "holding back" some on quality !! Look'et the color. Its not as rich as some of your regular analog captures, is it - - for these kinds of shows that they don't want you to have good results with. All about copywrite stuff maybe. Anyways... These shows ie, Enterprise, ST-NG, Voyager, you NEVER get pure qualiyt, but rather "tainted" quality.. or "jimmied" quality Sort of suck that they do this (treat us) to us in this way. Not all of us are "newbies" you know. We can obviously see a difference. But, as long as the majority of people "can't" see the difference, they will continue on w/ this practice !! Any comments ?? Have a great evening all, -vhelp
__________________
ESC K7S5A / XP 1800+ / Windows 98 ADVC-100[dvio] / WTVGO[avio] / DC10+[avio] / Canon ZR-10 / Delphi 6 Personal / JVC S-VHS HR-S3910U / Durabrand SSS w/ DVD Player STS75E / Sony TRV-22 FithElement/Dogma/BladeRunner/Contact |
||
5th August 2003, 10:36 | #30 | Link |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
I apologize in advance if this question was answered earlier on.
But how do you know that Enterprise was created as a high-definition source? Sure I've seen some of the screen shots some of you guys have posted here. Which say..... 'presented in Hi-Def where available' but like I say, what about the source! Now we, in the UK have SkyDigital who broadcast the first runs of most US shows. Enterprise, Buffy, X-Files etc. And up until last month we subscribers were only be able to view the output in crappy 4:3..... imagine that! Yep, if we wanted to see such shows in 16:9, we would all have to wait (several months) for BBC to broadcast them! So may I ask, is there a website somewhere that lists/confirms which shows are genuine Hi-Def sources..... You know. Just so I can cry a bit more about what I'm missing!
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
5th August 2003, 21:19 | #31 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 249
|
Auenf, where do you live? Those are certainly very, very good quality screenshots. Makes me want to beat up a UPN exec for not giving us that quality here in America. You, sir, are a very lucky man.
re: 9hd-enterprise-5.jpg Honest to God, I never even noticed that there was any writing on that shuttle before. OV-165. Who knew? |
5th August 2003, 22:39 | #32 | Link | |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
neo_sapien
Quote:
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
|
8th August 2003, 15:41 | #33 | Link | |||
avatar doesn't support IE
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Great Southland
Posts: 2,238
|
Quote:
i capped that whole episode, and the intro is definately better quality than the scenes that were shot, i havent had a look at the cgi cut scenes closely yet. Quote:
Quote:
http://us.imdb.com/Technical?0244365 Enf...
__________________
Sometimes I get halfway through a paragraph explaining something, then I just completely forget what I was thinking about which is when you will notice that the paragraph just ends rather abruptly... |
|||
8th August 2003, 16:03 | #34 | Link |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
auenf,
Thanks very much for the reply. I had no idea that information like this was on the imdb web site. Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
11th August 2003, 12:20 | #35 | Link |
avatar doesn't support IE
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Great Southland
Posts: 2,238
|
http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-1.jpg
http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-2.jpg http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-3.jpg http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-4.jpg http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-5.jpg http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd...terprise-6.jpg http://nitroware.net/~sportschook/hd/9hd-loop-2.jpg (yes i know i posted a couple of those before) look at those pics, and you'll see the intro was definately made for 1080i, the last one is from the loop again for a AUD$300 card, im not complaining about anything atm (new software in 4 days tho to fix a few bugs). Enf...
__________________
Sometimes I get halfway through a paragraph explaining something, then I just completely forget what I was thinking about which is when you will notice that the paragraph just ends rather abruptly... |
11th August 2003, 13:06 | #36 | Link |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
|
auenf,
Ok enough is enough (or should that be auenf is auenf!) Please stop rubbing our noses in it. I personally can't take it anymore! Those screen shots are amazing - It's just not fair! I still would like to know what that white writing to the right of the shuttle is all about on pic 5! I know, maybe I should emigrate over to Auz and ask you in person. Yeh. How about it.... Good-day neighbour!
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
10th September 2003, 06:08 | #38 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|