Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
19th August 2006, 19:52 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 93
|
x264 is so slow i want to cry
i started to encode a 108mins 1280x736 "hdtv/wmv9 video" (orig size 4.1GB) with X264 (megui, staxrip, whatever) using the "HQ-slow" setting.
I started the encode today at 4:30am....now it's 1:50pm and ETA is another hour. Makes 10+ hrs encoding time. Geeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzz And i have a A64 running at 2618mhz 1gb ram and otherwise pretty beefed up system. I just hope the quality is worth it....ugh.... SOrry..just wanted to rant....this IS a long time |
19th August 2006, 19:55 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
Posts: 2,856
|
Well, the settings is called "HQ-slow" for a reason. I don't see why you're complaining.
__________________
|
19th August 2006, 20:40 | #4 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
wait, is it the first pass you doing now? so you got another like 18 hours of second pass to go?
__________________
Geforce GTX 260 Windows 7, 64bit, Core i7 MPC-HC, Foobar2000 |
|
20th August 2006, 15:05 | #9 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're goin', and hook up with them later. ---Mitch Hedberg |
|
20th August 2006, 15:22 | #10 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
__________________
Geforce GTX 260 Windows 7, 64bit, Core i7 MPC-HC, Foobar2000 |
|
21st August 2006, 06:14 | #15 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
|
|
21st August 2006, 07:09 | #16 | Link | |
phjbdpcrjlj2sb3h
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,691
|
Quote:
|
|
21st August 2006, 09:43 | #17 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
i'm trying to convert 1024x768 with HQinsane 4000kb/s and second pass goes 2,8-3,3fps with e6600 @2,7GHz edit: sorry it was 1000kb/s 4000kb/s is about 2,3fps Last edited by n3r0; 21st August 2006 at 09:59. |
|
21st August 2006, 13:37 | #18 | Link |
Mr. Sandman
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 11,768
|
n3r0, welcome to the real world performance...
__________________
MPEG-4 ASP Custom Matrices: EQM V1(old), EQM AutoGK Sharpmatrix (aka EQM V2), EQM V3HR (updated 01/10/2004), EQM V3LR, EQM V3ULR (updated 04/02/2005), EQM V3UHR (updated 17/12/2004) and EQM V3EHR (updated 05/10/2004) Info about my ASP matrices. MPEG-4 AVC Custom Matrices: EQM AVC-HR Info about my AVC matrices My x264 builds. Mooo!!! |
21st August 2006, 14:04 | #19 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Craggy Island
Posts: 66
|
How about we setup a distributed computing network för x264 encoding, eh?
That number seems normal to me on that system. Even if the new Core 2 Duo is about ??% faster than the AMD X2 it doesn't add that much more fps in the end I think. Last edited by Danisan; 21st August 2006 at 14:20. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|