Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
11th December 2004, 14:47 | #21 | Link | |
Bored...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,812
|
Quote:
Guess it blows all halos away !?! Bye |
|
11th December 2004, 21:05 | #22 | Link |
Hates all his encodes
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 166
|
Just... Wow.
It eliminated all the halos on all of my EE'ed discs (That I tested), and even helped TV rips of anime!
__________________
http://thevideophile.blogspot.com/ Watch and be amazed by my frustration over the video world! |
13th December 2004, 03:30 | #24 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
But don't you think that's the story's end: christmas is still to come ...
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
13th December 2004, 20:00 | #26 | Link |
Perennially Silent Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Protector of Skuld and Guardian of Her Hammer
Posts: 64
|
*snickers*
Blurring something so badly that you have to call a sharpener to recover details? That doesn't sound like good filtering. Maybe you should try toning down the strength of dehalo. Off topic: Limitedsharpen is best as smode = 1
__________________
Proud Member of the Scandanavian Contingent |
13th December 2004, 20:27 | #27 | Link | |
Bored...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,812
|
@ Wilbert
Well, its was only a "remove all the halos" test... Guess BlindDeHalo2(3,3,150) would be already enough !?! Take a closer look @ the source, imo it looks already very blurry... The sharpness is mainly "virtual" and caused by the edge-enhancement !!! Quote:
BlindDeHalo2 removes halos, but LimitedSharpen sharpens without producing halos !!! Bye Last edited by Soulhunter; 14th December 2004 at 06:42. |
|
13th December 2004, 23:44 | #28 | Link |
Huh?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 3,103
|
Wow, the last picture looks so much more natural than the first one . Was that really just BDH2 and LS at work?
P.S: there is too much smoothing going on though, it's especially noticeable in the necklace (or whatever that thing around her neck is called). |
14th December 2004, 01:51 | #30 | Link |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Your new version is quite nice. I use it in conjunction with HQDering, which seems to get rid of some of the dark halos that BlindDeHalo misses, and I get quite nice results.
Source: HQDering(255) & BlindDeHalo2(2.5,2.5,100) Last edited by ObiKenobi; 14th December 2004 at 02:00. |
14th December 2004, 06:10 | #34 | Link | |
Bored...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,812
|
Quote:
Bye Last edited by Soulhunter; 14th December 2004 at 06:25. |
|
14th December 2004, 10:25 | #35 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
Soulhunter:
Thanks for holding up Next time I need a varlet to rage against some windmills, I'll call ya ... BTW, poor Jeanette shows _severe_ bad'n ugly oversharpening, and there's not too much left hiding behind the artefacts... Is that an "original" source, or did you add some enhancement manually? Wilbert, Kagura: You should give a 2nd thought on the topic. Know the story about the mathematician that inspected the two only barber shops in a small village, found one shop dirty&ugly with the barber's hair terribly dressed, the other shop bright & clean with the barber having his hair in perfect shape, and then went to the ugly shop to get his hair done ... ? I fully understand your reactions: "Okay, halos might be gone - but it looks so unimpressing afterwards, has so little contrast..." - and IMO that's exactly how it has to be: First remove the "wrong" sharpening, but keep what's behind the artefacts. Then (eventually) go on and make a better enhancement than the original one. To find a (too short) explanation about what's the actual problem and what's my opinion about it, as well as an example of what BlindDH2 basically is trying to achieve, please look here (Morpheus' pictures are the deal). To convince yourself, make this little experiment: Code:
a = anysource() b = a.UnsharpMask(127,3,0) c = b.BlindDeHalo2(3.1,3.1,110) # around these values ... fork a little around a = a.subtitle("orig") b = b.subtitle("enhanced") c = c.subtitle("BlindDeHalo2") interleave(a,b,c,a)
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
14th December 2004, 18:54 | #36 | Link | |
Bored...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,812
|
Quote:
Unfortunately some of my tv channels really look like this... But thats mainly caused by the very bad analog signal I receive !!! Bye |
|
14th December 2004, 19:31 | #37 | Link |
Perennially Silent Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Protector of Skuld and Guardian of Her Hammer
Posts: 64
|
Didée, I wasn't insulting blinddehalo. Rather, I merely thought that Soulhunter used too strong values in reducing halos on his first two pics.
__________________
Proud Member of the Scandanavian Contingent |
17th December 2004, 20:17 | #38 | Link |
Aspiring l33tz0rz0rz0r...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 88
|
Has anyone got any suggested settings or advice for using this on anime?
I can get it to remove SOME of the halos, but it does as much damage to random high-contrast parts of the picture as it does EE removal. Thanks all. I'll post some screenies and what settings I'm trying if anyone wants - I'm really having little luck with anime and this :/
__________________
SirCanealot And they shall know no fear.... |
17th December 2004, 21:55 | #40 | Link | |
Bored...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,812
|
Quote:
Save it as avs n' import it in ya scripts !!! Bye Last edited by Soulhunter; 17th December 2004 at 22:06. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|