Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
28th March 2013, 19:18 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,389
|
What do you think that should be done about it? The spatio-temporal operating scheme of Yadif or YadifMod is pretty much complete ... I don't think there is much left that could be improved. Except for "exhaustive" methods like mo-comp assistance etc., but that's a different ballgame.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
2nd April 2013, 15:05 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 117
|
Personally I use YadifMod(edeint=NNEDI3) for 80% of content.
I personally find the results to be far superior to TDeint (although when doing an IVTC TFM does have the upper hand). If the content is really tricky (swapping field orders etc...) QTGMC on the Fast preset rarely fails to extract good quality progressive video. Still, it does lack some of the options for fine-tuning that other deinterlacers have. Some kind of threshold for the interlacing check would be useful, as I find that on some content Vinverse() is needed afterwards to deal with leftover scan lines. |
3rd April 2013, 19:24 | #6 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 297
|
could you share your procedure, or at least a summary when using vinverse() after you have used QTGMC, (i use MeGUI by the way)
and when you say you still get scan lines left over sometimes, is that when dealing with progressive source but does have interlace lines present in certain (random) locations. an example would be the TV mini-series Dune (all special effect scenes were interlaced using a strange method (inverse maybe), yet video scenes were pure progressive)) |
5th April 2013, 16:23 | #7 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,346
|
Quote:
Normally you just add vinverse() for residual combing If you want to be more selective you can apply through trims() or your own user defined masks If the source was progressive by poorly deinterlaced (and that's what is causing the artifacts), you might try QTGMC in progressive mode |
|
5th April 2013, 16:35 | #8 | Link |
HeartlessS Usurer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 10,980
|
Further on poisondeathray post, if a lot of trims, then either ReplaceFrameSimple or ClipClop, would be a lot easier than Trim()'s.
__________________
I sometimes post sober. StainlessS@MediaFire ::: AND/OR ::: StainlessS@SendSpace "Some infinities are bigger than other infinities", but how many of them are infinitely bigger ??? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|