Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
31st August 2005, 19:26 | #161 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 28
|
Somewhere since version 1.4.0 the following bug has occured.
When I used the CLI and I specifiy the wrong PID, after correctly setting them using the "Detect PID" menu option. The program saves a project with a blank name '.d2v' instead of using whatever I specified on the command line, and it also uses a blank name for the audio files. In version 1.4.0 and earlier it always used the project name specified. |
31st August 2005, 22:20 | #162 | Link | |
ReMember
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
Seriously though, you're awesome for putting so much attention into this program. Thank you. EDIT: Just curious, but from 1.4.1 to 1.4.3 the EXE was cut in half meg wise. Pretty large change, how come? Last edited by Backwoods; 31st August 2005 at 22:23. |
|
31st August 2005, 23:55 | #163 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
__________________
My Sigature is empty as my life! |
|
1st September 2005, 00:36 | #165 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
|
|
1st September 2005, 12:43 | #166 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
|
Did anybody notice a difference in speed going from version 1.4.0 to 1.4.3? I'm not sure why, but the time necessary to save a given project (without audio) went from around 5 minutes to almost four times as much using the same settings. Another weird thing after switching is that i seem to not get any image preview in vdub 1.6.10 while manually scrolling the time line, while I do in vdubmod 1.5.10. weird.. looking into this
|
1st September 2005, 13:08 | #167 | Link | ||
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
1st September 2005, 13:31 | #168 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
|
I'm quite sure that all settings were the same, but the problem seems to be somewhere else in my setup, I think, since I noticed that I'm not able to get a picture in vdub 1.6.10 at all anymore, unrelated to the dgmpegdec version used. The speed issue also wasn't reproducible. Quite to the contrary: with another sample, the faster version this time was 1.4.3, (again by far, which is weird), so it might have been source dependend. Sorry for the trouble.. I hope i find the error in my system.
|
2nd September 2005, 10:09 | #169 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 63
|
a little suggestion for the template feature
instead of video = mpeg2source("__src__") it would be cooler if its only the src name without extension why? => video = mpeg2source("__src__.d2v") audio = MPaSource("__src__.mpa") you dont have to edit the avs for audio if someone has time to implement it would be great, thanks in advance fatxy |
2nd September 2005, 12:33 | #170 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
Also, we already have this issue on the development list stickie. One problem is what to do if there are multiple audio tracks. |
|
2nd September 2005, 13:08 | #171 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
a little example of what meant and which should be simple to add: i do often record via dvb some tv stuff -> .pva -> demux with pvastrumento ill get a mystream.mpv and a mystream.mpa drag the mpv in dgindex, create a project and avs via template current template ... video = mpeg2source("__src__") audio = MPaSource("__src__") AudioDub(video, audio) this will result in video = mpeg2source("X:\mystream.d2v") audio = MPaSource("X:\mystream.d2v") so i have to edit always the avs again (changing d2v to mpa or sometimes wav) thats why a src name without fileextension would be useful imo, i guess the ones that use dgindex to demux vobs or similar with ac3 and stuff dont have a audio part in the template anyway or maybe they decode them to wav and a ___src___ + .wav would be nice too, thats the good part, you can decide the extension yourself since a likely feature is already sticky on list it shouldnt take so long to expect in further build, should it? :P |
|
2nd September 2005, 13:23 | #173 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,901
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|