Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 959
|
--tune animation
__________________
x264 log explained || x264 deblocking how-to preset -> tune -> user set options -> fast first pass -> profile -> level Doom10 - Of course it's better, it's one more. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | Link |
I often say "maybe"...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France
Posts: 589
|
More b frames and refs (7 is good....more is useless IMNO)
If you have enough bitrate: Code:
--no-mbtree --b-pyramid normal --aq-mode 0 --psyrd 0:0 Well you need to test to get a good compromise ringing/banding... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
![]() Anyway, I would recommend this settings (if time doesn't matter): Code:
--preset veryslow --tune animation --aq-mode 4 --qcomp 0.72 --b-pyramid normal keep in mind, that you need a patched build for --aq-mode 4 like this http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?...postcount=2923 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | Link |
BluRay Maniac
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,426
|
His target is AVCHD, so this exotic setings such as bframes > 3 are not allowed
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,702
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | Link |
I often say "maybe"...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France
Posts: 589
|
I usualy use 2 passes encoding, even for testing.
Well I did a test: I compared my old reference encode (without mbtree and with regular settings on r1332) of my favorite dvd sample test with complete insane overkill placebo settings+mbtree of the last 1400... At my eyes, the old regular encode is highly better. But I repeat: it's just my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,702
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Asmodian; 27th January 2010 at 21:58. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 392
|
I usually use qcomp around 0.7 or a bit higher, so if AQ or MB-tree decide to screw up my image, they can't do too much damage. The higher the bitrate/quality that I'm aiming for, the higher I set the qcomp. I'm aware that I'm trading compression efficiency for more safety and a more constant quality acros the video. Kinda like when you chose to do more or less denoising before feeding the video to x264. IMHO, the default value of 0.6 is too low as a default...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | Link |
I often say "maybe"...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France
Posts: 589
|
I never try to change qcomp...
Will do tests by increase it a little. My test source is really difficult to compress, lot of motion, fades, grain....so good for testing! I output it at 768x416 at 800kbps (same than my reference old encode) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've experienced a bit, and found 0.72 the best for film. For anime it's even higher, the optimal value for my eyes is between 0.75 and 0.82. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|