Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
10th September 2007, 17:59 | #122 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
10th September 2007, 18:44 | #123 | Link |
Never Grow Up !
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 131
|
Great !!!
I've been fooling around a bit with my KEYDB.cfg ! Your program reads the old format perfectly ! As soon as I insert a disk the key is found. After editing the title the info is automaticly saved in the new format (as you describe) !!! Works like a charme ! After deleting the entery I started DumpHD again and the program went into direct key retrieval mode ! A few seconds later the key is added to the file !!! GREAT WORK ! |
26th September 2007, 15:44 | #127 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 24
|
Hi ,
I had to recompile it also to get it to work , after downloading the program you mentioned . It can't find any BD VID's , is this to do with your previous comments about requiring a new host certificate private key . Cheers |
27th September 2007, 00:37 | #128 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
What program? Visual C++ or the Runtime Library? With the latest of the latter there should be really no need to compile the library yourself.
Since the library only executes aacskeys to get the information (it really does nothing more) everything i wrote in the aacskeys thread of course applies to the direct key retrieval method: no VID for BD until someone finds the private key of a working Host Certificate. |
27th September 2007, 15:42 | #129 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 24
|
I had to download the microsoft visual c++ and recompile the library to get it to work ( XP ) .
The program works great , and as long as the dumpvid prog gets the VID number then I am good to go from there with aacskeys . Cheers for the reply . |
1st December 2007, 20:07 | #130 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 88
|
KenD00
I'm in Linux, I don't have a BD reader at PC but I have a PS3 with linux too. I can have a /dev/ndb (network block device) at PC who redirects to PS3 BD reader, but I'm having problems with the UDF 2.5 support on PC, so I can't mount it on it. I had successfully ripped the (encrypted) content of a BD to an external hard drive on PS3 and my intention is to use Dumphd to obtain the key from PS3 reader and then use that files. Is there any way to specify the underlying device of the encrypted files of the HD as /dev/nbd or just obtain the keys from dev/nbd to include them in KEYDB.cfg? If it isn't, could you release a version which could do that? A version with an option to instead of using getmntent, just ask for the device or just assume it's /dev/nbd Thanks in advance Last edited by XolocoTuxmaster; 1st December 2007 at 20:24. |
3rd December 2007, 00:31 | #131 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
DumpHD does not acquire any keys itself, since 0.4 it can use aacskeys to do this, so at first your idea requires a change of aacskeys. But anyway, i am pretty sure your idea to decrypt the BD will not work.
Your rip contains almost all the information you need to get the required keys but it misses one important thing, the Volume ID. There are two ways to get this one, either you know a hack of the PS3 drive to get it for free (like the XBox HD-DVD hack) or you know how to bypass the Hypervisor to perform an AACS authentication under Linux on the PS3. The second way also requires that you have never played a MKBv3 disc because there is still no new Host Certificate available to perform AACS authentication for MKBv3 or later. I am not aware of a solution to any of these problems, so currently it makes no sense to implement your requested feature, it simply will not work. And there is no need to inform me by PM about new posts in this thread... |
3rd December 2007, 11:35 | #132 | Link |
DRM Destroyer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
Is there any major difference between the DumpHD and BackupHDDVD when decrypting evo files, other than the Nav Bug fix?
I find that evo files decrypted with DumpHD or AnyDVDHD don't play back smoothly for the first few minutes. If I use BackupHDDVD, they play fine. The files are exactly the same length, but a quick compare shows roughly 100 different bytes in every 100Mb of data. Some of this is presumably the "nav bug" fix, but are there any other changes? Thanks BBBR |
3rd December 2007, 19:40 | #133 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
Despite processing HLI_PCKs and ADV_PCKs correctly DumpHD clears the key information and usage restrictions defined inside the NAV_PCKs in better conformance with the specs, thats the main difference in the output (and the missing Nav Chain Bugfix).
This is done throughout the whole movie so i don't understand why your problems disappear after some time, they should be present all the time. I have never had these problems with any of my HD-DVDs. Well, i think the player software is the problem, i'm pretty sure the SlySoft guys know what they do and they do it right, as do i . |
3rd December 2007, 21:53 | #134 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
So problem is that hypervisor doesn't let me know the Volume ID? Last edited by XolocoTuxmaster; 3rd December 2007 at 21:55. |
|
4th December 2007, 10:36 | #135 | Link | |
DRM Destroyer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Playback is jerky in both PowerDVD and Nero Showtime, which is why I thought it was something in the files. It affected me on both XP and Vista systems. But no-one else seems to have this problem. Is there any way I could put the "nav-bug fix" back in to the output from DumpHD or AnyDVDHD, and see if that makes any difference, or is the necessary data already stripped at that point? BBBR |
|
4th December 2007, 11:13 | #136 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
@XolocoTuxmaster:
Yes, thats the problem @ByeByeBluRay: Indeed a strange situation. Yes, you can apply the Nav Chain Bugfix later, but this cannot be reversed because the fix removes some data. I can mess around with my PackScanner to let it do the job if i find some time. |
4th December 2007, 11:27 | #137 | Link | |
DRM Destroyer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I guess I could have a go at it myself, but it would be a bit of a learning curve (I'd only have the BackupHDDVD source to go on), and I could never be quite sure if I'd got it right! BBBR |
|
4th December 2007, 21:16 | #138 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Internet
Posts: 378
|
Ok, here is a new PackScanner version which can apply the Nav Chain bugfix and also completely erase the CPI field (which contains eg. the usage restrictions), applying both doesn't harm or improve playback on my machine.
Code:
PackScanner 0.82 by KenD00 Usage: PackScanner [-options] input Options: -q quickscan, does not fully parse the PES header -b blanks the VC-1 Stream for Sub and the first DD+ Stream for Sub -r reverts the blanked streams -n enables Nav chain bugfix -z zeros the complete CPI field -l logging enabled, writes a log file with offsets to every pack Example: scan C:\MY_MOVIE.EVO, write log file and blank PackScanner -lb C:\MY_MOVIE.EVO Pressing ENTER during the scan aborts it |
5th December 2007, 10:38 | #139 | Link | |
DRM Destroyer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I'll test it out tonight (I tried before work this morning but got a "no server JVM" error - I think I might need to install the SDK). Cheers BBBR |
|
5th December 2007, 23:07 | #140 | Link | |
DRM Destroyer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I ran your PackScanner over an EVO that had the playback problems and it's now fixed. This is great for me, since it means I can now put my mkb4 discs onto my media server, but it does raise the question of why the fix is needed in the first place. The only thing that springs to mind is that all my HDDVDs are UK discs - there must be a difference between those and US ones, but what that might be, I have no idea. Anyway, thanks for the tool. If you do want to investigate further, I'll be more than happy to provide samples etc. BBBR |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|