AutoVAQ patch testing - Page 8

burfadel · 17th January 2010, 11:59

x264 Rev 1400 with aq patch 4 anyone?

thanks!

burfadel · 21st January 2010, 10:11

32 bit thanks

for me, the 64 bit workaround is actually slower!

jpsdr · 21st January 2010, 10:21

Hello.
Yes, the aq patch 4 + nal_hrd patch would be a very great thing, if someone can do it.
Thanks !

MuLTiTaSK · 21st January 2010, 15:55

patches.used

Code:

x264_intel_support.diff
x264_NAL_HRD.10b.diff
x264_thread_pool_v2.5.diff
x264_fix_float_point_exception.r1360.diff
x264_log_file_k08.r1400.diff
k.86.x264_restore_console_title.1391.diff
k.76.k_Cosmetic.03.r1360.diff
x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff

x264.1400kMod.generic.x86
x264.1400kMod.generic.x86_64
x264.1400kMod.core2.x86
x264.1400kMod.core2.x86_64

menlvd · 21st January 2010, 16:38

maybe it's bug in r1400. tested w/wo aq4 and clear build (no patches) same output.

Using old r1376 w/wo aq4 - normal encode out

komisar · 21st January 2010, 16:44

menlvd, whose build you use?

menlvd · 21st January 2010, 17:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by komisar

menlvd, whose build you use?

1 test x264.1400kMod.core2.x86_64
2 test clear build x264.1400.core2.x86_64.exe
using aq4 for kMod and aq1 for clear - same out

komisar · 21st January 2010, 17:05

menlvd, my build recompiled now... bugs found...

menlvd · 21st January 2010, 17:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by komisar

menlvd, my build recompiled now... bugs found...

thanks! waiting update on http://komisar.gin.by/

Upd: new one work well...

Terranigma · 21st January 2010, 19:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by menlvd

Upd: new one work well...

Yeah, it's working for me as well, so so far it seems that only komisar and masternobody builds perfect compiles (excluding the svn builds by bob0r).

MuLTiTaSK · 21st January 2010, 23:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by burfadel

32 bit thanks

for me, the 64 bit workaround is actually slower!

try with vfw4x264.exe instead it's faster for me and others it also doesnt corrupt MPEG2 streams loaded with MPEG2Source("") like avs4x264.exe does

Terranigma · 31st January 2010, 00:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by masterkivat

Sorry for being annoying, but could someone patch the newest build (r1416*) with the new AQ Experimental? I don't care being x86 or x64

I'd like to see this as well.

julius666 · 31st January 2010, 01:06

Here you are

http://uploading.com/files/c834mfd1/x264.exe/

Toolchain:
gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar)

Patches used:
x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff

Optimization:
--extra-cflags="-march=core2"
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

Code:

Platform:   x86
System:     MINGW
asm:        yes
avs input:  yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: no
mp4 output: yes
pthread:    yes
debug:      no
gprof:      no
PIC:        no
shared:     no
visualize:  no

Terranigma · 31st January 2010, 03:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by julius666

Optimization:
--extra-cflags="-march=core2"
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

Code:

Platform:   x86
System:     MINGW
asm:        yes
avs input:  yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: no
mp4 output: yes
pthread:    yes
debug:      no
gprof:      no
PIC:        no
shared:     no
visualize:  no

Thanks, but your builds crashes for me. Perhaps you can compile another build without the optimizations i have highlighted?

julius666 · 31st January 2010, 11:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terranigma

Thanks, but your builds crashes for me. Perhaps you can compile another build without the optimizations i have highlighted?

Of course, a build withouth -march=core2 (and not fprofiled):
http://uploading.com/files/7d1c63a3/x264.exe/

jpsdr · 31st January 2010, 12:09

Hello.
Thanks already for all the people who are making compiles.
Can someone nevertheless do the avq patch + nal_hrd beta 1.22 with 14xx (last one) ?

Thanks.

Terranigma · 31st January 2010, 17:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by julius666

Of course, a build withouth -march=core2 (and not fprofiled):
http://uploading.com/files/7d1c63a3/x264.exe/

OK, it works perfect now, so it could be just one of the patches that causes it to crash on my system. If you noticed by now, there has been some additional changes (now rev. 1419), so if you wouldn't mind compiling with your normal configuration (with march=core2/fprofiled) + 3 Additional builds would be great.

1. One without the march=core2 patch (and not fprofiled).
2. One without the march=core2 patch (and fprofiled).
3 And one with the march=core2 patch (and not profiled).
?

Trying to figure out which one of the 2 patches (possibly both) crashes my system, which i'm suspecting is more than likely the "march=core2" patch.

In advance.

masterkivat · 31st January 2010, 19:07

Hello guys.
I learned last night how to compile using this guide and with some help from the user @julius666.
I'd like to know if someone could run some tests to see if my version was compiled without any kind of error.
Here we go:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QLDYZSQ2

Toolchain:
gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar)

Patches used:
x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff

Optimization:
--extra-cflags="-march=core2" && fprofiled VIDS="C:/home/ICE_352x288_30_orig_02.yuv"

Code:

Platform:   x86
System:     MINGW
asm:        yes
avs input:  yes
lavf input: no
ffms input: no
mp4 output: yes
pthread:    yes
debug:      no
gprof:      no
PIC:        no
shared:     no
visualize:  no

Just a observation: since I'm still learning to do it with care, I didn't add lavf neither ffms suport. If someone could teach me, I'll appreciate.

julius666 · 31st January 2010, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terranigma

OK, it works perfect now, so it could be just one of the patches that causes it to crash on my system. If you noticed by now, there has been some additional changes (now rev. 1419), so if you wouldn't mind compiling with your normal configuration (with march=core2/fprofiled) + 3 Additional builds would be great.

1. One without the march=core2 patch (and not fprofiled).
2. One without the march=core2 patch (and fprofiled).
3 And one with the march=core2 patch (and not profiled).
?

Trying to figure out which one of the 2 patches (possibly both) crashes my system, which i'm suspecting is more than likely the "march=core2" patch.

In advance.

of course

as far as I know fprofiled mode shouldn't cause any trouble, but I could be wrong.
Anyway, I made two fprofiled builds, if neither of them works then I'll make the not fprofiled ones.

Oh, and a question: what CPU do you have?

rev1419:

Toolchain:
gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar)

Patches used:
x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff

Code:

Platform:   x86
System:     MINGW
asm:        yes
avs input:  yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: no
mp4 output: yes
pthread:    yes
debug:      no
gprof:      no
PIC:        no
shared:     no
visualize:  no

1. Optimization:
--extra-cflags="-march=core2"
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

http://uploading.com/files/9533a5fd/...re2.fporf.exe/

2. Optimization:
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

http://uploading.com/files/854ma677/...gen.fprof.exe/

(for some reason the one without core2 optimization was compiled without lavf input, because of that it is just 1.1 MB)

Terranigma · 31st January 2010, 21:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by julius666

a question: what CPU do you have?

Link

Quote:

Originally Posted by julius666

rev1419:

Toolchain:
gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar)

Patches used:
x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff

Code:

Platform:   x86
System:     MINGW
asm:        yes
avs input:  yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: no
mp4 output: yes
pthread:    yes
debug:      no
gprof:      no
PIC:        no
shared:     no
visualize:  no

1. Optimization:
--extra-cflags="-march=core2"
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

http://uploading.com/files/9533a5fd/...re2.fporf.exe/

2. Optimization:
fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv"

http://uploading.com/files/854ma677/...gen.fprof.exe/

(for some reason the one without core2 optimization was compiled without lavf input, because of that it is just 1.1 MB)

Thanks, the first one crashed, but the second one works perfectly. The first one is obviously crashing because i'm not on a dual-core system.

17th January 2010, 11:59	#141 \| Link
burfadel Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,229	x264 Rev 1400 with aq patch 4 anyone? thanks! Last edited by burfadel; 21st January 2010 at 08:37.

21st January 2010, 15:55	#144 \| Link
MuLTiTaSK Registered User Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 668	lastest komisar patched builds with AutoVAQv4+ patches.used Code: x264_intel_support.diff x264_NAL_HRD.10b.diff x264_thread_pool_v2.5.diff x264_fix_float_point_exception.r1360.diff x264_log_file_k08.r1400.diff k.86.x264_restore_console_title.1391.diff k.76.k_Cosmetic.03.r1360.diff x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff x264.1400kMod.generic.x86 x264.1400kMod.generic.x86_64 x264.1400kMod.core2.x86 x264.1400kMod.core2.x86_64 __________________ StaxRip at Doom9's \| StaxRip at Sourceforge [RSS] \| StaxRip Donations \| TheMTiNFo Last edited by MuLTiTaSK; 21st January 2010 at 16:08.

21st January 2010, 16:44	#146 \| Link
komisar Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Minsk, Belarus Posts: 235	menlvd, whose build you use? __________________ ..::[I am live here]..::..[My x264 CLI/VFW builds and tools]::..

21st January 2010, 17:05	#148 \| Link
komisar Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Minsk, Belarus Posts: 235	menlvd, my build recompiled now... bugs found... __________________ ..::[I am live here]..::..[My x264 CLI/VFW builds and tools]::..

31st January 2010, 01:06	#153 \| Link
julius666 Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Location: Hungary Posts: 79	Here you are http://uploading.com/files/c834mfd1/x264.exe/ Toolchain: gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar) Patches used: x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff Optimization: --extra-cflags="-march=core2" fprofiled VIDS="C:/git/station2_720p.yuv" Code: Platform: x86 System: MINGW asm: yes avs input: yes lavf input: yes ffms input: no mp4 output: yes pthread: yes debug: no gprof: no PIC: no shared: no visualize: no Last edited by julius666; 31st January 2010 at 12:44. Reason: the exe on the old link wasn't really fprofiled, the new one should be faster

21st January 2010, 10:11	#142 \| Link
burfadel Registered User Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,229	32 bit thanks for me, the 64 bit workaround is actually slower!

21st January 2010, 10:21	#143 \| Link
jpsdr Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: France Posts: 2,316	Hello. Yes, the aq patch 4 + nal_hrd patch would be a very great thing, if someone can do it. Thanks !

21st January 2010, 16:38	#145 \| Link
menlvd Registered User Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moscow Posts: 97	maybe it's bug in r1400. tested w/wo aq4 and clear build (no patches) same output. Using old r1376 w/wo aq4 - normal encode out

31st January 2010, 12:09	#156 \| Link
jpsdr Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: France Posts: 2,316	Hello. Thanks already for all the people who are making compiles. Can someone nevertheless do the avq patch + nal_hrd beta 1.22 with 14xx (last one) ? Thanks. Last edited by jpsdr; 31st January 2010 at 18:01.

31st January 2010, 19:07	#158 \| Link
masterkivat 変身! Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Brazil Posts: 38	Hello guys. I learned last night how to compile using this guide and with some help from the user @julius666. I'd like to know if someone could run some tests to see if my version was compiled without any kind of error. Here we go: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QLDYZSQ2 Toolchain: gcc-core-4.4.3 (built by Komisar) Patches used: x264_AQ_experiments_v4.diff Optimization: --extra-cflags="-march=core2" && fprofiled VIDS="C:/home/ICE_352x288_30_orig_02.yuv" Code: Platform: x86 System: MINGW asm: yes avs input: yes lavf input: no ffms input: no mp4 output: yes pthread: yes debug: no gprof: no PIC: no shared: no visualize: no Just a observation: since I'm still learning to do it with care, I didn't add lavf neither ffms suport. If someone could teach me, I'll appreciate.