Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
21st August 2014, 13:52 | #27121 | Link |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 10,344
|
The answer is quite obvious:
If you have no problems, you should just leave it alone. Additionally, this is not the place to discuss windows timings.
__________________
LAV Filters - open source ffmpeg based media splitter and decoders |
21st August 2014, 13:57 | #27122 | Link | |
Kid for Today
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,477
|
Yep, mVR and foobar work just fine with invariant TSC on W7SP1 and this timer was one of my main motives to upgrade so be it
This said, the guys in that thread claim that W7/W8 react differently: Quote:
|
|
21st August 2014, 14:52 | #27123 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 208
|
Hi, I have some 16fps and 18fps footage, typical known for Super 8 or Standard 8 cine films (or very old movies).
My TV supports these modes: 1080p23, 1080p24, 1080i25, 1080p29, 1080p30, 1080p50, 1080p59, 1080p60 So I inserted in "display modes". Smooth motion is on. When I start a movie with 16/18fps, it always switch into 23.976Hz mode. For 16fps the specs looks fine. 16fps23Hz: http://s1.directupload.net/images/140821/9bk4hwqc.png When I start 18fps, the specs says, there is a frame repeat after every 0.85 seconds! 18fps32Hz: http://s7.directupload.net/images/140821/3782tt9f.png When my tv stays at 60Hz (I put 1080p18 as 'workaround' in display modes. It doesn't switch for 18fps.) there is not such problem. 18fps60Hz: http://s14.directupload.net/images/140821/oiu5dai9.png In my opinion the better choice. Is that a correct behavior? Or do I something wrong? Am I wrong? To be complete. Thats the result for 16fps60Hz: http://s14.directupload.net/images/140821/9pp68lj7.png Last edited by Morku; 21st August 2014 at 15:11. |
22nd August 2014, 16:06 | #27124 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
I just tried uninstall everything then update mpc, madvr and xySubFilter to the lastest and it no longer crash. So either it was bug with old version or i changed some setting wrongly. Too bad i no longer keep the old install file so i cannot check what exactly cause the crash. the script is too large to put on pastebin. If you want it, i uploaded it to mediafire. The place where i crash is 19:00 https://www.mediafire.com/?4p8f408zwntrgfd |
|
22nd August 2014, 18:45 | #27126 | Link |
Broadband Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,859
|
Thanks for the sample. The way that script used /iclip is rather inefficient in terms of memory usage and performance with VSFilter-based filters, compared to using /clip to do the same thing. So while it may drop frames in some parts if scaled to 2560x1440, it definitely doesn't look like that should cause out-of-memory crashes, even with larger than default queues and cache sizes with the latest XySubFilter build (as you seem to have found). Probably not a bug, since starting with Beta2 there were a couple changes which reduced memory usage compared to Beta1, so I'd assume it was just that.
|
23rd August 2014, 07:01 | #27127 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
|
Worrying Maxwell Optimus Trunc/Trepidation
Hi, does anybody know why I cannot convince Maxwell 860M to HVA decode? >
I tried the 'forceVendor' 'Nvidia' which was straightforward, and renaming the exe MPC-HC file. While that 'alerted' or 'woke up' the gpu up and ram is used, the VPU section, GCardHW, etc is not triggered. It seems I've crossed a threshold, but the Maxwell gpu is playing stupidly hard to get. [NOTE: THIS COULD BE VERY PROBLEMATIC FOR FUTURE YOUTUBE VIDEOS / SUPPORT e.g. I did NOT purchase an 860M to perpetually watch/decode 4k on my yeasty hd 4600] @Nekromantic What registry strings were entered to enable the Maxwell mobile chips/what are the correct registry stings? How on earth WERE you Triumphant? 'custom registry hack? Am I to understand it's only a nominal triumph as madVR Chroma upscaling + Chroma image doubling is MAxwell Hardware video accelerated - pertaining to madVR, as well? Thanks to all/any who know of a fix; I bet there are at least a few others out there who've this question/ harbor similar disconcertions. Quote:
Last edited by Kevin Gilmore; 23rd August 2014 at 19:13. Reason: Thanks Vivian / AnimeViewer; Sounds Like I need to try LAV filter; will try later |
|
23rd August 2014, 10:32 | #27128 | Link |
/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 643
|
It has nothing to do with madVR, it's the decoder.
If you want to use H/W decoder - then you should select DXVA or nVidia CUVID decoders in Lav Video Decoder settings. If you have problems with them - welcome to http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=156191 |
23rd August 2014, 13:43 | #27130 | Link | |
Troubleshooter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 339
|
directX problem 800m optimus gpu
Quote:
Other 860m Optimus users have stated that they've only got video to playback with the Nvidia gpu forced in MPC-HC if they went into MPC Options -> Output and set DirectShow Video to "system default" and the RealMedia Video and QuickTime video to Video Mixing Renderer 7. That both effective disables madVR and DirectX9 features. madshi has recommended people reinstall the DirectX 9 runtime files, but last I heard no one has had success getting the runtime to reinstall. As far as madVR adding the registry key for the 860m: you'll need to have madVR set as the DirectShow Video output in MPC Options, and have one of the NNEDI3 options selected. That will get your key added, but it will not do anything to get the 860m to run properly. You could make a separate thread elsewhere in the software players forum to see if any 860m users have found a workaround, but unfortunately right now a solution may be necessary from Microsoft and/or Nvidia's end. Given Nvidia's history when it comes to fixing madVR/MPC/non-game related bugs there may never be a fix. Some people believe it is related to the following: Code:
The following code snippet caused the error: VMR9NormalizedRect r1 = new VMR9NormalizedRect(0, 0, 0.5f, 1); VMR9NormalizedRect r2 = new VMR9NormalizedRect(0.5f, 0, 1, 1); hr = (HRESULT)mix.SetOutputRect(0, ref r1); hr = (HRESULT)mix.SetOutputRect(1, ref r2); If a VMR9NormalizedRect gets initialized with any parameters apart from 0, 0, 1, 1 it will only display a black screen.
__________________
System specs: Sager NP9150 SE with i7-3630QM 2.40GHz, 16 GB RAM, 64-bit Windows 10 Pro, NVidia GTX 680M/Intel 4000 HD optimus dual GPU system. Video viewed on LG notebook screen and LG 3D passive TV. Last edited by Anime Viewer; 23rd August 2014 at 14:57. Reason: fixed sentence structure |
|
25th August 2014, 09:31 | #27131 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
I absolutely love the way NNEDI3 makes 720p content look. On a good source the difference between the 720p encode and 1080p source can be difficult to distinguish at times. |
|
25th August 2014, 10:19 | #27132 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,646
|
Quote:
NNEDI gives great results on text? Yeah I'd agree with you there, so if you want to look at nice sharp NNEDI edges on text then yeah go crank it up, what a serious waste of resources though. I still stand behind what I said, it does almost nothing on actual footage. It would seem you just lose most of the benefits of NNEDI by downscaling the image down to 1080. (I tested on 1920x1200 as well) There may be the odd scene where NNEDI adds something worthwhile to 720 content but I have yet to find a scene where it does. Feel free to post a screenshot that proves it's worth enabling. I generally don't watch the credits roll enough to warrant enabling NNEDI on anything 720 or higher not to mention how taxing it is on the GPU for such an insignificant overall PQ improvement. Last edited by ryrynz; 25th August 2014 at 10:21. |
|
25th August 2014, 11:09 | #27133 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 21
|
I found something that are concered with madTPG and ArgyllCMS. When using dispcal.exe and madTPG to calibration the monitor,the madVR settings "how many video frames shall be presented in advace"could not set more than 10, otherwise it will show the error message with dispcal.exe and finish the work. Windowed mode and FSE mode have the same issue. It works well when setting <= 10.
Is it a bug? OS:win7 x64 madVR:v0.87.10 ArgyllCMS:1.6.3 graphic card:750Ti meter:colormunki design Last edited by Neet009; 25th August 2014 at 11:16. |
25th August 2014, 15:47 | #27134 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Jinc3 vs. NNEDI3 Edit: 2nd images too big as this forum doesn't auto re-size to width. http://abload.de/img/mn-full55c1a.jpg http://abload.de/img/nnedi3-fullvdfok.jpg |
|
25th August 2014, 21:57 | #27135 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 321
|
So if you watch alot of gaming footage with alot of HUD's and text then yes, there is a clear advantage to NNEDI3 even for 720p-1080p. But thankfully I don't do that and stick to movies and tv shows. (guess it could be good for watching ESPN but also don't do that either, I just watch it live through my cable box so no need to upscale it with MadVR and my HTPC.)
__________________
MPC-HC/MPC-BE, Lav Filters, MadVR CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600, Video: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 -> TCL S405 55", Audio: Audio-Technica M50S |
26th August 2014, 01:09 | #27136 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Neverland, Brazil
Posts: 169
|
I'd like to ask a quick question (which my search results didn't get me anything).
When using MPC-HC, by checking the "Statistics" while playing a video with madVR, the specified framerate for 23.976 will be 60, yet with EVR-CP it will be 23.976 instead. It seems that madVR likes to render frames that would otherwise just be repeated instead. Is there a reasoning behind this?
__________________
madVR scaling algorithms chart - based on performance x quality | KCP - A (cute) quality-oriented codec pack Last edited by Niyawa; 26th August 2014 at 01:11. |
26th August 2014, 01:38 | #27137 | Link | |
Audiophile
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 353
|
Quote:
the old behavior can be enabled with the old path(disabling "present several frames in advance"). Be warned that some features can/will break if you do this. |
|
26th August 2014, 04:06 | #27138 | Link | |
Troubleshooter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
I have statistics displaying on a tv that supports both frame rates, it has both in the list, and it is showing a frame reading of 23.90 and up (it slowly ticks up as the 23.976 video plays, so it would probably get to 23.97 if I leave it running).
__________________
System specs: Sager NP9150 SE with i7-3630QM 2.40GHz, 16 GB RAM, 64-bit Windows 10 Pro, NVidia GTX 680M/Intel 4000 HD optimus dual GPU system. Video viewed on LG notebook screen and LG 3D passive TV. Last edited by Anime Viewer; 26th August 2014 at 04:20. |
|
26th August 2014, 04:52 | #27139 | Link |
Broadband Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,859
|
This is false. No features can/will 'break' if you disable Present in Advance.
In any case, when Present in Advance is enabled madVR presents a frame every vsync interval. If disabled, madVR presents a frame every movie framerate interval (if smooth motion disabled). This is why MPC-HC statistics may show a discrepancy if you have some of these settings enabled and use higher refresh rates than the video. |
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|