Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > General > Decrypting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th March 2012, 15:19   #1  |  Link
Ex0rcist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23
Question about DVD Decrypter

Hello

Sometimes when i decrypt DVD with DVD Decrypter (IFO Mode) it says in log file that audio has delay in ms but in filename there's no delay. Should I pay attention to that?

0x80 - Audio - AC3 / 2ch / 48kHz / DRC / English / LBA: 118 / PTS: 00:00:00.287 / Delay: -80ms
0xE0 - Video - MPEG-2 / 720x576 (PAL) / 4:3 / LBA: 1 / PTS: 00:00:00.367 / Delay: 0ms

VTS_01_1 T01 2_0ch 224Kbps DELAY 0ms.ac3

Thanks for the answers.
Ex0rcist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 15:41   #2  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,629
Do you really need to use DD for demuxing? Never used it like this, so I paid no attention to this particular issue.

80ms represents 2 PAL frames and it should be noticed - if DD removed the delay you won't see any delay by remuxing with a delay of 0ms. If however there will be a delay, then DD forgot to mention it in the name.

The development of DD ceased long time ago, so either the developer or a more experienced member could shed a light here, you're bound to testing yourself.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 16:29   #3  |  Link
bigotti5
Spielberger
 
bigotti5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Little bug in DD.
Clarification here...
bigotti5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 16:33   #4  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,629
Nice explanation
So DD is wrong when it shows -80 but is correct when demuxing? Or still wrong and cuts those 80ms?
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 17:22   #5  |  Link
Ex0rcist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23
Thanks for the quick response. I'm wondering the same, should I just ignore that delay in Stream Information or ? Oh do you maybe know for any DD alternatives?
Ex0rcist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2012, 17:31   #6  |  Link
bigotti5
Spielberger
 
bigotti5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Quote:
Or still wrong and cuts those 80ms?
DD is still wrong and does not cut anything...

Quote:
should I just ignore that delay in Stream Information
just ignore..
bigotti5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.