Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
1st June 2012, 17:25 | #15183 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am very happy now that jdobbs has found a solution for whatever was wrong with my disk and will implement it in the next release. |
||
1st June 2012, 18:37 | #15184 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
The truth is that your disc wasn't "illegal" or "wrong". As it turns out, a part of one of the MPLS files was just exceptionally odd. So the issue was in BD-RB in that it wasn't robust enough to handle that odd (but legal) circumstance.
|
1st June 2012, 19:44 | #15185 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
I'm just so used to BDRebuilder NOT being the problem -- almost always it is a bad rip, bad decode, pre-processing, faulty drive, overheating processor, etc. |
|
2nd June 2012, 00:22 | #15186 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Quote:
|
|
2nd June 2012, 14:40 | #15187 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 112
|
I got the error shown below last night. Got the same error selecting BD-9.
I couldn't find any setting in .ini or in hidden options that would seem relevant. Any suggestions? Code:
[05:29:32] Source: SOPRANOS_S6D3 - Input BD size: 30.20 GB - Approximate total content: [02:45:23.997] - Target BD size: 22.95 GB - Windows Version: 6.1 [7601] - Quality: High-Speed Option (BD-25), Two Pass - Decoding/Frame serving: DirectShow - Audio Settings: AC3=0 DTS=0 HD=1 Kbs=640 [05:29:33] PHASE ONE, Encoding - [05:29:33] Processing: VID_00002 (1 of 3) - [05:29:33] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00002] - [05:36:48] Reencoding video [VID_00002] - Source Video: VC-1, 1920x1080 - Rate/Length: 23.976fps, 77,835 frames - Bitrate: 12,826 Kbs - [05:36:48] Reencoding: VID_00002, Pass 1 of 2 - [05:36:49] Reencoding: VID_00002, Pass 2 of 2 - [06:14:08] Video Encode complete - [06:14:08] Processing audio tracks - Track 4352 (eng): Keeping original audio - Track 4353 (spa): Keeping original audio - [06:14:08] Multiplexing M2TS - [06:18:45] Processing: VID_00004 (2 of 3) - [06:18:45] Extracting A/V streams [VID_00004] - Error in attempt to extract audio/subs. - AV frame too large (65532 bytes). Increase AV buffer. [06:21:46] - Failed to retrieve audio, aborted Code:
[Status] LABEL=SOPRANOS_S6D3 VERSION=v0.40.09 (beta) SOURCE_SIZE=32428507588 SOURCE_VIDEO_SIZE=31940352000 TARGET_SIZE=24641536000 REDUCTION=.756202699707254 RESIZE_1080=0 AUDIO_TO_KEEP=all KEEP_HD_AUDIO=-1 SUBS_TO_KEEP=all BACKUP_MODE=0 MOVIEONLY_TYPE=0 USE_LAVF=0 INSTANCES=1 DGDECNV=0 QUICK=0 ENCODE_STEP=0 COMPLETED=1 [00002] AUDIO=11 PGS=1111 VIDEO2=0 V2MBRATE=0 M2TS_TARGET=7999935971 RATE=12826 SPLITS=1 NSTART=27000000 NEND=173086560 NSIZE=7537858560 FLINK=0 MLINK=0 [00004] AUDIO=111 PGS=11111 |
2nd June 2012, 18:20 | #15190 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Quote:
Never confuse "playing" with "decoding and reencoding" -- playing can ignore errors, decoding/reencoding can't. The error comes from TSMUXER. The AV buffer isn't really the issue. That's just where the corrupt source showed itself. You'd probably get it no matter how big you made the buffer. Last edited by jdobbs; 2nd June 2012 at 18:23. |
|
3rd June 2012, 02:48 | #15191 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near LA, California, USA
Posts: 1,545
|
I was able to solve the run-time error I reported earlier. I found out about a program called "process explorer". So I ran BD Rebuilder and processexplorer told me that one of the places BD Rebuilder first goes to when it's opened is the Application Data folder in Documents and Settings. I went there and found that most of the folders are hidden, including the BD Rebuilder folder. So I decided to unhide them all and see what happens. Now it starts without a hitch. No errors. I rehid the Application Data\BDREBUILDER folder again, and I got the error again. Apparently BDRebuilder doesn't like hidden files or folders.
__________________
Pirate: Now how would you like to die? Would you like to have your head chopped off or be burned at the stake? Curly: Burned at the stake! Moe: Why? Curly: A hot steak is always better than a cold chop. Last edited by Revgen; 3rd June 2012 at 03:04. |
3rd June 2012, 03:35 | #15192 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Quote:
|
|
3rd June 2012, 03:42 | #15193 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near LA, California, USA
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
I'm just glad it's working now.
__________________
Pirate: Now how would you like to die? Would you like to have your head chopped off or be burned at the stake? Curly: Burned at the stake! Moe: Why? Curly: A hot steak is always better than a cold chop. |
|
3rd June 2012, 07:20 | #15194 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
|
hi jdobbs, quick question not used bd rebuilder for a while as bd drive broke and i have since bought a new one,
when trying to set up the codecs as described on the first page, i think i set up some wrong, or couldn't find the exact setting, as i right clicked inspect, and opened the program, and it seemed to correct everything for me automatically as since clicking inspect again everything is set to ok?, im assuming that it should work correct as inspect has set it for me, or do i need to go back into ffshow and rest manually? also im recently trying to rip a backup blu ray with ipbot and its asking me to update my ffdshow to rev 4400 or newer, if i update, would this break the bd rebuilder settings? Hope you can help, thanks again |
3rd June 2012, 14:25 | #15195 | Link | |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,975
|
Quote:
As for FFDSHOW, it depends on the version used and any bugs in it. I haven't tested any of the newer versions, the last one I've tested is 4052. It should be ok to upgrade -- but if you run into any problems, revert to one of the recommended releases before reporting anything as a bug in BD-RB. |
|
3rd June 2012, 14:28 | #15196 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,368
|
if everything is set as ok, then you should be good to go unless you're using any kind of codec pack like klite etc. If you do, remove em. They usually interfere with BDRB's operations. Do NOT update to 4400 or newer. It has not been tested to work correctly with BDRB. If you do update, you do so at your own risc for multiple reasons. 1) The latest versions are not tried & tested and probably do not work correctly like BDRB wants them too and 2) jdobbs does not accept any kind of bug report from versions that do not match the ones in the first post
|
3rd June 2012, 19:37 | #15197 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,812
|
if latest ffdshow works in ripbot so it has to also work in bdrb.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
3rd June 2012, 19:44 | #15198 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Within the main Source.
Posts: 895
|
That's why I suggested using MSConfig. It's _a_ step to answering the question "Why?". That's still my suggestion while you're now enjoying using BD-RB.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave; but rather to skid out broadside, thoroughly used, torn and warn and loudly proclaim; WOW; What a ride!!! Soon, I'm going to do it AGAiN in different skin!! |
3rd June 2012, 21:58 | #15199 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near LA, California, USA
Posts: 1,545
|
I tried MSConfig with "diagnostic startup" before I unhid the application data. The problem was still present. So it's a fairly specific issue that's deeply rooted.
__________________
Pirate: Now how would you like to die? Would you like to have your head chopped off or be burned at the stake? Curly: Burned at the stake! Moe: Why? Curly: A hot steak is always better than a cold chop. |
3rd June 2012, 22:44 | #15200 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
|
A question to jdoobs:
I read in the Frequently Asked Questions thread about AUTO_BIAS=n the following: "You replace the "n" with one of 3 values: 0, 1, or 2. "0" tells the quality selection to have a bias toward speed, "1" (the default) balances speed and quality, and "2" tells the quality selection algorithim to have a bias toward higher quality." But in the HIDDENOPTS file it says: n = 0-3 - Def=1, Auto Qual bias, 0=high speed, 1=normal, 2=high quality, 3=highest qual Can I use 3? What is the difference between 2 and 3 (quality and speed)? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|