Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
31st August 2005, 06:15 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 618
|
Impressions of Shrinkto5
I downloaded and tested this new software, (availible at: http://www.shrinkto5.com/) not expecting much since 1-click DVD backup software is becoming more and more mainstream. Here's what I wound up with.
Movie tested: Star Wars Episode 1, Region 1, Disk 1, Full disk copy. Decrypted with DVDFab Decrypter. Installation was fast and easy, since the download is a self-contained installer. Uninstalling left no harsh effects on my test system. The test system is a self-built unit meant for video processing, including the following: AMD Anthlon 64 on an MSI Socket 939 motherboard which is running 2GB of Micron memory (PC3200) in a dual-channel mode. All programs are in a 32-bit environment (due to lack of support for drivers and programs with Windows 64). The CPU ran at 94-100% all through the 25 minute, 59 second event. The output size was left at default in the program (4.37GB), but the resulting files clocked in at 4.21GB -- bringing back memories of InstantCopy 7. The average encoding speed was 144 FPS, and completed without any input on my part. The interface itself is clean and easy to understand, requiring only four clicks to complete a full-disk project. The quality is mixed, however. Granted, there's a lot of reduction necessary to whittle the original 7.78GB file to 4.37 -- and any transcoder currently availible is going to show the strain from that. So to that end, I can forgive the degree of pixelation I saw in the final product since even very good software like DVD Shrink or Nero Recode would show roughly the same thing (to be fair about it, I ran a full-disk comparison with Nero Recode). The issue I ran into that made me frown the most was the handling of Multi-angle material -- which this disk has. There was a high degree of stuttering within these scenes, with flickering images of alternate languages here and there. Since this was absent in both the original rip and the Recode project, I can only conclude that Shrinkto5 has issues with this sort of material. While quality is certainly subjective, I found the Recode files much more pleasing to the eye, while not necessarilly being as sharp. Much, MUCH, less pixelation with Recode. Not that I mean to discourage the developers, should they read this post. On the contrary: I'd like to see how this software ends up with a little more development and testing. I love it when a free software rivals high-priced "professional" tools! Reversely, however, I conclude that Shrinkto5 is not yet a threat to other transcoders like DVD Shrink or Nero Recode. It certainly won't be embraced by users of high-end encoders like CCE (nor does it have the many functions availible in DVD Rebuilder... which, incidentally, appears to handle Multi-angle sources just fine). This is just me testing one (count 'em: ONE) movie. The price is right, so feel free to test it yourself. Curriousity's good for you.
__________________
Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice?" --George Carlin |
31st August 2005, 09:55 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 350
|
I found also exactly the same obversations as you did writersblock29. I tried it on an old favorite, The American President. PAL R4 6.72gb, with all bar English removed in Audio & Subs. Took 9min 13sec on my AMD X2 4400 to reduce it down to 4.19gb.
End result showed some major blocking in the Universal intro with random flickering of coloured blocks. The actual movie would be okay to watch on a small screen TV but not on anything larger than a 26" set. On the PC screen the pic was very fuzzy and lots of added noise. Back to ReBuilder, that took me 51min and excellent results
__________________
Cheers, CM |
31st August 2005, 19:01 | #3 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,034
|
thanks for the reports. I'll wait a till the engine improves before trying it myself. If it does get decent it'll be a boon for linux/mac users.
__________________
www.mrbass.org DVDShrink | DVD2DVD | DVDFAB | Mac guides |
1st September 2005, 01:31 | #4 | Link |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I was just about to install Shrinkto5 but thought, eh, I better take a look on Doom9 to see if anyone else has tried it. I'm glad I did, because I have enough "junk" installed on this system of mine (certainly not that St5 is junk, but I just don't need it).
I only use DVD Shrink to check the options of the movie I want and then export it uncompressed. From there I use DVD-RB Pro. I still find DVD Shrink to be easier in customizing a movie to my own liking. I don't use it at all for transcoding, even for small percentages (under 10%). I use CCE for my encoding needs, using custom matrices and sometimes undot() and deen() when applicable. I hope St5 improves at least to the point of DVD Shrink since the latter is no longer hosted (though it's easily obtainable via p2p). St5 has a great interface and much potential. It's especially good for those (like many of my friends) who need something very easy to use with relatively good quality output. Last edited by Aquilonious; 1st September 2005 at 01:33. |
1st September 2005, 11:34 | #5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 132
|
What happened to ReJig (C++ open source DVD9 to DVD5 transcoder) by the way? ...anyway maybe ShrinkTo5's developers can integrate ReJig's source code into its own (if there is any features/functions or other stuff in there that they can use )?, it's great that there now is at least one active GPL'ed project/program that does DVD9 to DVD5 ripping simple and quick, (to bad DVDShrink isn't open sourced too )
|
4th September 2005, 09:50 | #6 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
|
|
4th September 2005, 12:09 | #7 | Link | ||
....
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,797
|
Quote:
it will be updated eventually. Quote:
__________________
Narrator: And of course, with the birth of the artist came the inevitable afterbirth - the critic. (History of the World part 1) |
||
12th September 2005, 15:04 | #9 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Have you tried DVD Shrink? It might surprise you. |
|
12th September 2005, 16:08 | #10 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 132
|
latest CloneDVD (CloneDVD2) also give great results, though it's not free
It also helps if you strip out menus, special-features and foreign audio tracks |
13th September 2005, 02:53 | #11 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 618
|
@Richk50
At 10-15%, pretty much all transcoders will do a somewhat reasonable job on a good source -- it'd be easy to give Shrinkto5 a pat on the back it doesn't deserve. It's best, in my opinion, to push it well beyond where you'd normally put it in order to see if it offers any sort of improvement over what's currently availible. That's why I chose to test it against Nero Recode 2. I wasn't expecting crystal-clarity; in fact, I assumed either test would look like a mess. They did! But the Recode version of Star Wars Eposide 1 was far easier on the eye than Shrinkto5. Therefore, Shrinkto5 offers no improvement over what else is out there. At least, that's what I came up with.
__________________
Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice?" --George Carlin |
13th September 2005, 08:01 | #12 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
__________________
MultiMakeMKV: MakeMKV batch processing (Win) MultiShrink: DVD Shrink batch processing Offizieller Übersetzer von DVD Shrink deutsch |
|
13th September 2005, 12:29 | #13 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
I don't have quite 2.4m but I do have 2m wide. So far, all my Shrink backups look great and that includes my Return of the King backup (theatrical version). That looks better than my DVD Rebuilder version and that was at 55% compression in Shrink. |
|
13th September 2005, 13:23 | #14 | Link | |
Dutch strain
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,039
|
Quote:
__________________
What can I do to protect myself against the flu? By far, the single best way to prevent the flu is for individuals, especially persons at high risk for serious complications from the flu, to get a flu shot each fall. |
|
13th September 2005, 21:15 | #15 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 90210
Posts: 510
|
Quote:
Last edited by mrbass; 13th September 2005 at 22:03. |
|
13th September 2005, 21:19 | #16 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
The DVD Rebuilder version was a mess and had sharpness problems. It actually was hard to look at for long periods. The Shrink version had better colour and contrast. Last edited by mrbass; 13th September 2005 at 22:02. |
|
13th September 2005, 23:15 | #18 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Last edited by nwg; 13th September 2005 at 23:21. |
|
13th September 2005, 23:44 | #19 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 272
|
It depends on the source material.
If the source is encoded really good, then there is enough "room" for a transcoder to reduce the file size without a visible quality degrading and even no macro-blocking. Then it looks better than a new encoding with CCE. But for many movies this is'nt the case and DVDRebuilder wins. goonix |
13th September 2005, 23:51 | #20 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Using DVD Rebuilder doesn't mean it is automatically better everytime. IT depends on the bitrate of the original. I also have plenty of Shrink and DVD-RB discs that look the same. |
|
|
|