Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
9th January 2008, 06:52 | #582 | Link |
Pig on the wing
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 5,730
|
Hi Fizick,
a small bug regarding the source clip in MVTools functions, see this thread: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...99#post1084799. Somehow it seems that they don't assume "last" as the source. On my system, if I don't specify "last" in MVDegrain2, I usually get an unrecognized exception error when loading the script.
__________________
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of the Moon... |
11th January 2008, 03:51 | #585 | Link | |
Avisynth Developer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,167
|
Quote:
Your MV filters typically declare an argument definition like "c[mvbw]c[mvfw]c...". This declares the filter requires at least 1 clip and optionally support upto 3, which is not really the case, the filter actually needs 3 clips. The [...]'s make an argument optional and give it a name. Unfortunatly there is no syntax for named mandatory arguments. To get correct implicit last processing you will have to give up the clip argument naming and use the form "ccc..." |
|
11th January 2008, 16:39 | #586 | Link |
AviSynth plugger
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Russia
Posts: 2,183
|
Terranigma, probably not before I merge this contribution
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...03#post1084103 and consider IanB's "ccc..." suggestion
__________________
My Avisynth plugins are now at http://avisynth.org.ru and mirror at http://avisynth.nl/users/fizick I usually do not provide a technical support in private messages. |
11th January 2008, 16:49 | #587 | Link |
*Space Reserved*
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 953
|
Oh ok, thanks for the answer. I think I found something with tritical's latest colormatrix; on one source I have, the whole video is green. I guess I should let tritical know about this, and ask for him to let me upload the video to somewhere, like a private server, so that he may check it.
|
14th January 2008, 11:23 | #588 | Link |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to learn how to great mask using MvMask. I tried alot, but it is some how complicated for me,
script: DGDecode_mpeg2source("C:\Documents and Settings\vesi\Desktop\Test\test.d2v") LoadPlugin("C:\Program Files\AviSynth 2.5\plugins\mvtools.dll") tfm(order=1).tdecimate(hybrid=3) crop( 4, 60, -10, -56) Spline36Resize(624,272) # Spline36 (Neutral) FFT3DFILTER(sigma=2.1,bw=32,bh=32,ow=16,oh=16,bt=3, sharpen=0.8) O. Now I don't know should i use MvMask before resizing and denoising or after? |
14th January 2008, 13:24 | #589 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
@ Vesi: what result or what operation are you trying to achieve? MVMask on its own doesn't do anything useful to the source. It just produces a mask, which then can be used to do different things.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
14th January 2008, 17:51 | #590 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
FFT3DFILTER(sigma=2.1,bw=32,bh=32,ow=16,oh=16,bt=3, sharpen=0.8) and it will have most affect on non detailed areas like Walls and clear blue sky but leave detailed areas like grass alone. or maybe an edge finder that masks out all non edges then you could sharpen just the edges to get some edge pop. While you are at it how about an example of color masker so you can change all blue sky in some scene to sunset orange |
|
14th January 2008, 20:55 | #591 | Link |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Didee; as i'm totaly noob to scripting, i have seen some rips to have some kind of mask, and i found in MvTools MvMask, and i thought i can do this with my normal script... with good sources or bad to use denoisers like fft3d, removegrain and degrainmedian and shrpner seesaw or lsf and creat a mask. i am sure i am wrong 90% but i have read the mvtools documentation, and that was honistly for me some advance work that i couldn't make it alone, and i asked here that how to do this for different type of source and why to creat mask on the rip?
if this post is out of topic, should i open a thread? |
16th January 2008, 09:39 | #593 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
|
This problem was for the most part solved a long time ago and many great papers have been written on this topic. Noise is mostly random where as detail is not. Even a non random pixel chess pattern mixed in that might be seen as detail spatially will not temporally. Detail will track across frames without much basic change so your cloud example is not as hard to deal with as you think.
|
16th January 2008, 09:57 | #594 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 377
|
Think what you want to think. For me the problem is not solved and will not be solved until semantic recognation of images are implemented. Till then all great papers just describe a suboptimal solution where some work better (MV Tools) but most not. This is also the reason why you must do finetuning for every Filter available and the word 'best' is forbidden here.
|
16th January 2008, 10:05 | #595 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
It's easy to get excited when reading some papers. But usually there's a rude awakening following up. It's called "practice".
From your various hooray's and icandobetter's over the last days, we've heard only your speech, but didn't see any practice.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
17th January 2008, 13:00 | #596 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
|
|
17th January 2008, 13:29 | #597 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
note: as for "practice" my latest 300 encode is the best yet and it will get better and better because I have a lot to learn still. |
|
17th January 2008, 13:59 | #598 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,391
|
Quote:
But you're missing the point. There was a query for suggestions. I made a suggestion. I showed screenshots, offered a test encode, and, most importantly, showed the script that does the processing, and gave explanations about the how and why. Now, you say you can get better results by more simple means. Sounds exciting, but there are no screenshots or samples to give an idea of how "better" does look like. Not to speak of a script that other people could try out, too. So far you showed exactly nothing. If I'd tell you I could turn lead into gold, you would not believe my bragging. You would ask for proof. There's no sarcasm in that.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|