Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
#1 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
Muxman 0.13 released
A great deal of work has gone into changing Muxman ifo generation from a simple "canned" set of tables to being compiled from a database. Unfortunately, the work isn't complete enough to allow the Navigation section to be user defined.
But this release does have 3 improvements: Definable subpicture palette Improved I-Frame encoder Frame-accurate chapters (provided the chapter begins on an I frame) Available from the Muxman homepage Please consult the mxp documentation especially the new Settings Section |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | Link |
|
ScenAid
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
|
Excellent advancements.... It won't be long before Scenarist is obsolete for what we need it for
![]() Question: Will there be support to specify channels for audio/subtitles that's out of order.. IE: audio 1 = 84. Scenarist requires you dummy 80-83 in order to do that. Thanks - D3s7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
Scenarist is just enforcing the specs, audio and subpicture stream numbers should be consecutive. Right now, and for the foreseeable future, Muxman will not allow manual stream assignments. When it does the specs will still be enforced by some mechanism.
At present, with only one title, the audio and subpicture stream numbers follow the value in the scp or mxp file. But once Muxman starts working with multiple titles per titleset the script file stream numbers will be relative to each segment, but not necessarily the same as the titleset. This will happen if two titles have different requirements, e.g. title 1 has one audio stream of 5.1 DD, while title 2 has one audio stream of 2.0 DD. But - it should not be necessary to skip stream numbers. There are 2 places where absolute numbers, rather than symbolic names, are used in scripts. One is line numbers for the "goto" command. Muxman changes the way commands are defined into what resembles assembler source, complete with labels. The other place where numbers are used is to specify a "stream" in the SetSTN command. I prefer to call this a track, as it is the number used to index a table in the PGC which then supplies the actual stream number. This number remains the same even if stream numbers are reassigned. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | Link |
|
ScenAid
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
|
Understood... and I'm not sure the attraction to it for authoring houses
The problem we run into in Scenarist is when a particular PGC/VOBID uses different stream assignments from the rest of the Title. Scenarist won't except those for mux (as can be understood) forcing us to dummy the appropriate streams. Not really a problem for PGC demuxes but for VOBID demuxes it can be an issue for Seamless cells Seems more and more the DVD "Specs" are more "Recommended guidelines but feel free to break if you wish"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
Are you saying that there are titles which have one or more Vobs with different stream numbers than the rest of the title? This makes little sense - how does the player access a stream that suddenly appears in the middle of a title. As far as I know, and this is how I planned to implement in Muxman, all the segments (or "tracks" in Scenarist) must have the same video attributes, and have the same number and type of audio/sub streams.
I can understand a segment using different streams than others in the same titleset, this is commonl. Not in the same title, though, but a seperate title. Last edited by mpucoder; 28th March 2005 at 17:49. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | Link |
|
ScenAid
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
|
unfortunatly, yes...
a few have "additional" audio tracks in one PGC -vs- another (same VOBID) - Finding Nemo for example, 80,81,82 PGC 1 uses 80,82 - PGC 2 uses 81 (example - not sure if that's the correct mapping) - demuxing this by vobid isn't an issue but 81 must be dummied on other assets in that PGC. that's just one example but I've run across 4 or 5 movies like that. The problem is in order to dummy 81 across the other vobid's causes the cells to have to be linked non-seamless... Currently one of the solutions is to flip 82 and 81 so you have 80,81 on the main and the "extra" pgc uses 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | Link |
|
member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 346
|
when i mux only a bmp or a m2v file(no audio no subs) muxman crashes(encountered an error message). ifoedit reports that there is no titleset tables when i do a get vts sectors(no video_ts.ifo is created)
in version 11c it muxed everything and the operation compete window pops up but muxman close once ok is pressed. ifoedit does not complain.
__________________
some guides Last edited by sweetness; 29th March 2005 at 18:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | Link |
|
member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 346
|
the microsoft "MunxMan.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience."
win xp sp2 it crashes once the progress bar is done. tried v.12c and it does the same thing as v.11 it closes once ok is pressed. v.13 crash all the time now with audio or not.
__________________
some guides Last edited by sweetness; 29th March 2005 at 22:07. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | Link | |
|
ScenAid
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
version 6.0.2900.xxx seems to work fine where as 6.0.2800.xxx doesn't. I was only able to test this theory on one machine but upgrading the dll seemed to resolve the issue - i assumed the newer dll was from xp sp2 but it may be from the .net 2003 extensions as well.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
I'm fairly certain this bug has been squashed by version 0.13c
@sweetness - Muxman is supposed to close when you click OK. That will probably change in the future when I'm certain that the program can run project after project without problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | Link |
|
member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 346
|
thanks tried out .13c and seems to work good.
also notice some dummy menus. BTW creating 16:9 stills Display Mode=Only Pan Scan doesn't work, muxman displays 4:3. but P/S and LB or Only Letterbox works.
__________________
some guides |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | Link |
|
NuMenu4u
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,361
|
@SD
Are you working from a mxp project file? I have noticed that 0.13 has changed the scripting for pan. It was Display Mode=Only Pan Scan -> it is now Display Mode=Only Panscan.
__________________
NuMenu4u here |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | Link |
|
member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 346
|
@Zeul
yes thank you. i even check the site too, but missed that the space was gone. oh ya wrong guy. that's ok i get that all the time.
__________________
some guides |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
That's true, I changed some keywords to be the same as Scenarist.
video display mode Only Pan Scan changed to Only Panscan (as noted above) subpicture display mode PS changed to Pan in all combinations (Pan, Letter/Pan, Wide/Pan, Wide/Letter/Pan Sorry for not drawing more attention to that. Also Uop can be specified in scenes (but not put into the vob - oops) |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | Link |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,398
|
btw, if you want a sneak peek at some stuff. Here's a sample of the vm commands syntax that will be used.
And here is the auto generated navigation currently built for you. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|