Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > New and alternative video codecs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st May 2004, 01:23   #1  |  Link
lexor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 839
Dirac - BBC will rule future codecs

BBC's R&D is hard at work developing The Dirac Project

taken from their site:

Quote:
Dirac is a general-purpose video codec aimed at resolutions from QCIF (180x144) to HDTV (1920x1080) progressive or interlaced. It uses wavelets, motion compensation and arithmetic coding and aims to be competitive with other state of the art codecs.
__________________
Geforce GTX 260
Windows 7, 64bit, Core i7
MPC-HC, Foobar2000

Last edited by bond; 3rd May 2004 at 15:53.
lexor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2004, 03:18   #2  |  Link
Sirber
Registered User
 
Sirber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,776
Hi

Many project say that they will be the best. None so far. Stop dreaming and use xvid or realvideo
__________________
Detritus Software
Sirber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2004, 04:46   #3  |  Link
P0l1m0rph1c
h4x0r5 0n teh yu0r pC?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 156
It's amazing what slashdot can do to an unknown video codec....[/useless_post]
P0l1m0rph1c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2004, 10:26   #4  |  Link
stephanV
gone
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,709
Quote:
Originally posted by Sirber
Hi

Many project say that they will be the best. None so far. Stop dreaming and use xvid or realvideo
They are saying they're competative, not the best. Anyway, there's no point in wrting off a codec before you've seen what it can do. Or do you believe XviD and RealVideo are the best we'll ever get? (if they are the best anyway)
stephanV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2004, 11:16   #5  |  Link
kilg0r3
! - User - !
 
kilg0r3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,081
Hey, come on. A company like the BBC has done preliminary resaerch and now offers it to the opensource community. I think this is great, eventhough they might be a bit late, taking into account the number of existing codecs.
__________________
Keep your tone warm and your sigs decent!
kilg0r3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st May 2004, 11:22   #6  |  Link
jimmy basushi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: russia -> australia
Posts: 143
stephenv i believe sirber is replying to the topic.

i also would love to see this compared to our current greats rv10 and xvid (check codec test) when the devels believe it can compete.
jimmy basushi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2004, 03:44   #7  |  Link
dragongodz
....
 
dragongodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,789
also they say
Quote:
It has been developed as a research tool, not a product, as a basis for further developments.
and
Quote:
An experimental version of the code, written in C++, was released under an Open Source licence agreement on 11th March at http://sourceforge.net/projects/dirac.
so no it wasnt developed to strictly try and take on other codecs or be a product. simply dismissing it is not right either as it may be of interest to other codec developers in some way(or not as they choose).
dragongodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2004, 11:44   #8  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life looks better in HDTV
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 10,026
A friend of mine, from time to time, does some sub-contract work for the BBC and has spoken to a few people in their R&D department about this!

It all started when he asked one of these R&D guys what digital format the BBC was intending to use to store their massive library of 'live' broadcast material.

Back in 2002 (when DVD and Mpeg2 was still taking off) he was told that the R&D department was working on something 'way better' than Mpeg2. "Was it Mpeg4"? my friend asked. "Absolutely not"! came back the reply. "What is it then"? It's a secret at the moment... but follow me and I'll show you some examples.

Out came a shiny CD-R with approx 60 mins of broadcast quality audio and video on it... some soccer match I think it was...

Anyway, apparently it was "the dogs bollocks"!

Cheers
__________________
Still confused about anamorphic images? Then look here! | Main Encoding Interests: Hardware device playback | My Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2004, 14:29   #9  |  Link
chilledoutuk
Registered User
 
chilledoutuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 334
any chance of anyone compiling this and posting it on here?
would be much apeciated
chilledoutuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2004, 14:50   #10  |  Link
Latexxx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 618
It doesn't have an encoding app. Somebody needs to do program which utilises the encoding system provided by the BBC's library.
__________________
A/V moderator @ hydrogenaudio.org
My weird old sh*t: http://www.nic.fi/~lhahne/
http://last.fm/user/Latexxx/
Latexxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 13:53   #11  |  Link
Nic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,260
Woah...this makes h264 seem fast.

I've thrown a bit of code together to go from AVS File to Dirac, and doing my first 50 frame encode as I type this. It's gonna take some time. I'll report back on quality and maybe screen shots if it encodes ok.

Cheers,
-Nic
Nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 14:02   #12  |  Link
kilg0r3
! - User - !
 
kilg0r3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally posted by Nic
[B]doing my first 50 frame encode as I type this. It's gonna take some time.


Ah, now come on Nic, you're not using your pocket calc again, are you?
__________________
Keep your tone warm and your sigs decent!
kilg0r3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 14:15   #13  |  Link
Nic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,260
@kilg0r3: I could have drawn the pictures quicker Now im writing app to view the YUV files it decodes to. I think I did it at too higher a bitrate, 50 frames at 352x288 came out at 845,671 bytes. I'll let you know what it looks like soon

-Nic
Nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 15:06   #14  |  Link
ac-chan123
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 219
For .yuv(single file with muliple Frames) you can use Avisynth with rawsource filter/plugin(http://www.avisynth.org/warpenterprises/).

AC-Chan(Robert Vincenz)
ac-chan123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2004, 15:12   #15  |  Link
Nic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,260
It uses a .hdr and .yuv file for the yuv format. I've just written a little mfc app for viewing, which will suffice for now. But thanks for the tip.

Dirac definitely encodes ok. Slow but everythings working. Doing more tests at FD1 res. ill post pics

Cheers
-Nic

ps
Ok FD1 is too slow to even try. I had a shower and lunch and came back it had only done 2 frames. When I tried 352x288, the I Frames are fine but intermediate ones have weird artefacts on them. Also seeing I set the streaming preset the bitrate was extremely high. This codec needs a lot of work, but nice to see a opensource wavelet codec being developed...

Last edited by Nic; 3rd May 2004 at 17:12.
Nic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2004, 19:13   #16  |  Link
slavickas
I'm Shpongled
 
slavickas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally posted by Nic
It uses a .hdr and .yuv file for the yuv format. I've just written a little mfc app for viewing, which will suffice for now. But thanks for the tip.
http://www.ee.columbia.edu/~ywang/Re...YUVGenius.html
maybe suits your needs?
slavickas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2004, 00:35   #17  |  Link
LigH
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
 
LigH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, Gardelegen
Posts: 1,476
Now that guliverkli made a DS splitter filter, and the source is at version 0.4.3, IMHO it's about time to have a Win32 binaries distributor with regular builds; anyone volunteering?!...
LigH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2004, 00:42   #18  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life looks better in HDTV
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 10,026
Agreed... a compile would be nice.


Cheers
__________________
Still confused about anamorphic images? Then look here! | Main Encoding Interests: Hardware device playback | My Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2004, 16:02   #19  |  Link
Sharktooth
Mr. Sandman
 
Sharktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 10,818
Here's my build (0.4.3 sources): http://ebola.gamersrevolt.it/dirac/dirac-0.4.3.rar
I did not check it coz i'm a bit busy but it should work.
Sharktooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2004, 17:32   #20  |  Link
Sharktooth
Mr. Sandman
 
Sharktooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Haddonfield, IL
Posts: 10,818
Sorry i couldnt edit the prev. message however i tested the build and it works.
Sharktooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.