Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Hardware & Software > Software players
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd August 2015, 07:38   #681  |  Link
Aleksoid1978
Registered User
 
Aleksoid1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Russia, Vladivostok
Posts: 2,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
We want to measure the scaling of performance regarding bandwidth from 80 Mbps to 300 Mbps and the difference in performance between two implementations - Skylake in HD 530 and Nvidia 960.

Isn't it obvious ?
Why - what's it do ??
Ok - Skylake decoding ~200 fps, GTX 960 ~100. What's next ??
__________________
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 /GIGABYTE B450 Gaming X /Patriot 32Gb@3200 /Kingston 500Gb M.2 /RTX 4060 /Samsung U28R550UQI /OLED Philips 55OLED707 /Yamaha RX-V471 + NS-555 + NS-C444 + NS-333 + YST-SW215
Aleksoid1978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 07:39   #682  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
You didn't read all of my answer...

And if you 're looking for a very practical reason, one of the first replies would be that a decoder which manages 200 FPS on a clip and another one which manages 100 fps on the same clip during benchmarking, the first one will probably consume half power decoding a 50fps clip than the latter.

A second reply would be that in transcoding environment with no renderers involved, a faster decoder could lead to a faster transcoding.

A third reply could be that a two times faster decoder - a 200 FPS decoder vs a 100 FPS decoder - means that it can support two times more simultaneous streams in a video server environment or other multi- streams decoding requirements.

Do you want a fourth reason ?
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all

Last edited by NikosD; 23rd August 2015 at 07:47.
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 07:47   #683  |  Link
wanezhiling
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleksoid1978 View Post
And what's the point to test - if the outputs of 100 or 200 fps, what's the difference ??
The faster the decoding is, the faster the seeking is.
wanezhiling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 07:48   #684  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
Ahh. ..Wanezhiling just added a fourth
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 08:03   #685  |  Link
nussman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 238
If Skylake Hybrid Deocder is able to play HEVC 10bit UHD streams is also quite relevant isnt it?
nussman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 08:49   #686  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
No, not for me because we already know it does and very slowly compared to pure HW decoding.

Hybrid decoding is just an intermediate "solution" between SW and pure HW decoding.

Only a 72 EUs Skylake GT4e iGPU or a 48 EUs iGPU could have some interest.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all

Last edited by NikosD; 23rd August 2015 at 08:51.
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 09:04   #687  |  Link
nussman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 238
Hybrid Decoding is the solution for Skylake. I know it is slow, but it is important whether users can at least play "normal" (no 300mbs stuff) HEVC 10bit streams or not.

You think it is possible or not?
nussman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 09:07   #688  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
No it's not.

It would be a huge surprise if HD 530 could play 4K60 fps 10bit in real time on anything above let's say 15 Mbps.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 09:15   #689  |  Link
nussman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 238
Ok. If someone with skylake is willing to test this here are some samples: http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=46
nussman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 09:18   #690  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
That sample is good, because it's only 23 Mbps and could confirm or not my guess.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 17:14   #691  |  Link
P.J
Δ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 535
This one should be better for Yups to test: http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=97

Hybrid has terrible hiccups though.
P.J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 17:17   #692  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
At 50 Mbps ? No, no chance at all.

Still waiting for your tests with your 960 at those 5 clips
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 18:06   #693  |  Link
Yups
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
1) Samsung 4K@30fps-80Mbps file -0230
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...ProQuality.MP4
Decode= 163-168-172 [2-3%]
Playback= 132-141-145 [1-4%]


Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
2) Samsung 4K@30fps-80Mbps file -0235
http://imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sa...HD_Sample1.MP4
Decode= 198-205-207 [1-3]
Playback= 143-154-158 [1-3%]

Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
3) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -100Mbps file
https://www.sendspace.com/file/fvgk57
Decode= 163-166-169 [0-2%]
Playback= 129-139-143 [2-5%]

Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
4) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -200Mbps file
https://www.sendspace.com/file/usyase
Decode= 134-139-141 [2-3%]
Playback= 114-123-128 [2-6%]


Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
5) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -300Mbps file
http://www.filedropper.com/crowdrun2160p50300mbps
Decode= 113-122-126 [1-5%]
Playback= 97-110-115 [3-6%]



It's a very good result I would say. SKL GT2 shader power is the first bottleneck as expected for 8 bit HEVC playback, but it's fast enough nevertheless.
Yups is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 18:10   #694  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
Perfect!

Thank you for your results.

Extremely good I would say.

It's a 4K120 FPS HEVC 8bit decoder at 300 Mbps (!)
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 19:15   #695  |  Link
P.J
Δ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 535
EVGA GTX 960, Win10 x64:


1) Samsung 4K@30fps-80Mbps file -0230
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...ProQuality.MP4

Decode= 117-118-120
Playback= 114-115-118

2) Samsung 4K@30fps-80Mbps file -0235
http://imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sa...HD_Sample1.MP4

Decode= 119-122-126
Playback= 117-118-121

3) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -100Mbps file
https://www.sendspace.com/file/fvgk57

Decode= 129-132-134
Playback= 128-131-133

4) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -200Mbps file
https://www.sendspace.com/file/usyase

Decode= 104-107-109
Playback= 104-107-109

5) Crowd_run 4K@50fps -300Mbps file
http://www.filedropper.com/crowdrun2160p50300mbps
https://mega.nz/#!RVNy0BhB!DpsJlf5n_...vT0P12VikS3xko

Decode= 83-93-97
Playback= 81-92-97

Last edited by P.J; 24th August 2015 at 12:03.
P.J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 19:27   #696  |  Link
P.J
Δ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
At 50 Mbps ? No, no chance at all.

Still waiting for your tests with your 960 at those 5 clips
That's 10bit, hope Yups gives it a try
http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=97


Can you upload the 300Mbps video somewhere else like mega.nz?
P.J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 19:29   #697  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
When I go back home I'll give it a try.

Does mega.nz allow 360 MB files ?

Is filedropper slow ?

Last time I checked it was fast enough.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 20:15   #698  |  Link
Yups
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.J View Post
This one should be better for Yups to test: http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=97

Hybrid has terrible hiccups though.

Hybrid

Decode= 56-74-144 [22-36%] ~110 watts
Playback= 48-62-106 [0-28%] ~107 watts


CPU only

Decode= 83-99-156 [68-98%] ~130 watts
Playback= 62-70-81 [35-97%] ~127 watts


i7-6700k 4 Ghz @1.15V
HD 530 @1150 Mhz 10.18.15.4274


CPU only is faster in this case, but all 8 threads are running with ~90% load most of the time. I think on an ULT GT2 SKU with 4 threads only Hybrid will be faster than pure CPU.
Yups is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 20:20   #699  |  Link
NikosD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2,901
Good speed.

4K60 FPS HEVC 10bit at 50 Mbps but with the minimum values below 50fps.

Better than I thought.

What about this one ?

http://demo-uhd3d.com/fiche.php?cat=uhd&id=46

It's from Satellite.
__________________
Win 10 x64 (19042.572) - Core i5-2400 - Radeon RX 470 (20.10.1)
HEVC decoding benchmarks
H.264 DXVA Benchmarks for all
NikosD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2015, 20:31   #700  |  Link
P.J
Δ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yups View Post
Hybrid

Decode= 56-74-144 [22-36%] ~110 watts
Playback= 48-62-106 [0-28%] ~107 watts


CPU only

Decode= 83-99-156 [68-98%] ~130 watts
Playback= 62-70-81 [35-97%] ~127 watts


i7-6700k 4 Ghz @1.15V
HD 530 @1150 Mhz 10.18.15.4274


CPU only is faster in this case, but all 8 threads are running with ~90% load most of the time. I think on an ULT GT2 SKU with 4 threads only Hybrid will be faster than pure CPU.
Great
Would you disable HyperThreading in BIOS and try it again?


Quote:
Originally Posted by NikosD View Post
When I go back home I'll give it a try.

Does mega.nz allow 360 MB files ?

Is filedropper slow ?

Last time I checked it was fast enough.
Mega allows even big files like 10gb. Got filedropper to work.
P.J is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.