Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
14th March 2011, 22:00 | #6003 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
According to eac3to the video track is 24.000fps, not 23.976fps. Try muxing the video to MKV with eac3to, then add the audio track with mkvtoolnix. Finally, set your display refresh rate to 24.000Hz instead of 23.976Hz. Does that fix the problem? |
|
14th March 2011, 22:03 | #6004 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
Quote:
By default it writes its capture to the pagefile so you need to change that to something else, via File/Backing Files. By default it also hides a lot of system events so you need to Enabled Advanced Output under the Filter menu. The open the filter editor, crtl+L, and add two new filters:
|
||
14th March 2011, 22:12 | #6005 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
Quote:
I'll try eac3to again now but the "eac3to and more gui" is messed up on my machine. All the buttons are overlapping each other. The gui prompts me for certain items like a destination which I have already given it etc. I'll try to use a different gui or command line.n there. According to ffdshow its 23.974 Do you think the video renderer can improve playback of such files without having to remux, that no doubt alot of people will have. Would madVR leveling out its timestamps prevent frame drops? Last edited by mark0077; 14th March 2011 at 22:18. |
|
14th March 2011, 22:33 | #6007 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
fair enough I guess madVR only takes its info from the incoming decoder, ie info below for this 24.000 fps clip, which in turn takes info from the file itself. Nothing that can be done...
Video: YV12 2048x1080 (16:9) 23.97fps |
14th March 2011, 22:42 | #6009 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
Quote:
Heres another vote for madVR showing the actual rate of the incoming video, not according to the source filter, as I learned the hard way today, they can't always be trusted if the files arn't muxed / created properly in the first place. Cheers for the help figuring out my issue. I'll ask the ffdshow guys to have perhaps some sort of indication in their gui also to show the actual fps, not the fps listed in the video file. These problem files even at 24hz still show erratic behaviour in evr-cp graphs so I think timestamps must be erratic in these files or something like that. Nothing specific to madVR of course. Last edited by mark0077; 14th March 2011 at 22:58. |
|
14th March 2011, 22:58 | #6010 | Link | |
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Four posts ago I suggested to you to set your display to 24.000Hz. Have you tried to do that in the meanwhile? Next time please try my suggestions *first* and post your next comment only *after* you've done that. That would save me a lot of time. Thanks. And here comes another post you're forcing me to: "Nothing that can be done without remuxing" may be wrong. Settings your refresh rate to 24.000Hz may result in the original mp4 file playing just fine. See? If you had tried setting your display to 24.000Hz before dropping another 4 posts on me, you may have saved me half an hour of time. Right now you're forcing me to speculate on what might be necessary, instead of letting me know the results of the tests I suggested. |
|
14th March 2011, 23:10 | #6011 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
You or anyone else doesn't have to spend 1 second of their time if they don't wish reading / acting on others posts.
We had this discussion before so lets not have it again, the last time I'll say it, there is absolutely no need to have an attitude in replies to posts which you often have, because as I say, if you don't want to spend time reading them, don't, period. No need to accuse others of wasting your time etc. Thats just ridiculous. Its your time you decide what you spend it on. Lighten up a bit and don't spend time replying to posts if you feel you're wasting your time, move onto something else perhaps. You don't seem to read peoples posts either, I told you I set the frame rate to 24 when remuxing and my display to 24.000hz.... It doesn't completely fix the issue of madVR and ffdshow taking their fps information from the decoders / incoming filters (I know this has no effect on madVRs performance), but people read this information and in this case I trusted that ffdshows detection of the frame rate in the file was correct (and in turn madVR's display of this information) so in that sense, the issue isn't fixed. I have asked the ffdshow guys for a possible improvement in that area. The graphs are still erratic in evr-cp at 24hz and I can only speculate that madVR isn't showing having any dropped frames because the timestamps seem all over the place in some of these files I have, and because my display hz is now above the rate at which the variation in the timestamps would result in a frame drop... PS: You can ignore this post if you feel your wasting your time doing so. Turns out it's not 24hz either its vfr which neither madvr evrcp or ffdshow could tell me. Last edited by mark0077; 15th March 2011 at 02:17. |
14th March 2011, 23:25 | #6012 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 293
|
Quote:
I'm not sure how to look for how much write was going on, though I think I don't see much differences when madVR is running
__________________
Spec: Intel Core i5-3570K, 8g ram, Intel HD4000, Samsung U28D590 4k monitor+1080p Projector, Windows 10. |
|
15th March 2011, 09:21 | #6013 | Link | |||
Registered Developer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,140
|
Quote:
Quote:
If I tell you to try A and B, then *please* try A and B, and then report back on whether it worked or not. Anything else means you're wasting my time. It's really not rocket science. Quote:
The first time you said that was by editing one of your posts at the same second when I made my last post yesterday. |
|||
15th March 2011, 10:02 | #6014 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
Yes I do think you should change the way you react to forum posts. No matter what anyone says it shouldn't cause the angry reactions you sometimes appear to show. Its not good for you. I edited many forum posts over the past few days. All way before any of your angry replies. End of the day dont reply to ANYONE with such accusations of wasting time and anger because its uncalled for.
I'll continue the discussion about my issue elsewhere as I seem to be getting more positive feedback and even some svn changes that might help. Just shows how one approach to forum posting results in a different outcome than others for everyone. I'm out of here anyways there's no point going on and on. Last edited by mark0077; 15th March 2011 at 10:04. |
15th March 2011, 13:11 | #6017 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,106
|
Roll your eyes all you want, positive feedback on various forums including avs is now meaning updates are being looked at for mvtools, and possibly other pieces of software to better support vfr..
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...025800&page=39 ffs everyones trying their best here to contribute something good to the community... you think you'd do the same rather than making things worse by posting such stupid replies. Just leave it, this thread is getting enough unnecessary replies at this point. Will be my last anyways. Last edited by mark0077; 15th March 2011 at 13:25. |
Tags |
direct compute, dithering, error diffusion, madvr, ngu, nnedi3, quality, renderer, scaling, uhd upscaling, upsampling |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|