Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#1021 | Link |
interlace this!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: i'm in ur transfers, addin noise
Posts: 4,555
|
@ chipzoller:
if something was shot on film for TV in PAL land, the cameras will have been run at 25fps as there is no reason to run them at 24. so i'd assumefps, and be assured the audio pitch will be correct as it was shot at that speed to begin with (and nobody would bother with a timestretch for a 1/1000 difference in speed). it's possible this episode was either never aired in NTSC land, or a tape could not be found and thus a conversion was done off a PAL master.
__________________
sucking the life out of your videos since 2004 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1023 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 600
|
laserfan,
EDIT: Nevermind, I tried my suggestion and it doesn't work... your script is the best I can think of, of the solutions that don't require manual intervention. Last edited by ChiDragon; 15th May 2007 at 13:29. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1024 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,925
|
TDeint() generates strange artefacts.
Source is 1440x1080i (Canon HV20) http://www.archive.org/download/jvc_hd7/hv20_05.m2t.mpg After TDeint() look what happens ![]() I've also uploaded sample after conversion to 1280x720 (x264) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=71Z12QI0 Another example: Source: http://www.archive.org/download/jvc_hd7/hv20_07.m2t.mpg Once again strange spots show up ![]() I used very simple script LoadPlugin("C:\Users\Dawidos\Documents\Delphi_Projects\RipBot264\Tools\dgindex\DGDecode.dll") MPEG2Source("c:\TEMP\job1\job1.d2v") tdeint() LanczosResize(1280,720)
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper Last edited by Atak_Snajpera; 15th May 2007 at 13:40. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1026 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MO, US
Posts: 999
|
Almost ready to start working on tivtc/tdeint again. I read back through the last few pages and this is the list of current issues:
tdecimate mode 2 problem non-standard framerates - Xesdeeni/ChiDragon tdecimate problem with mode 0 decimation - ChiDragon add tfm hints to tdeint - ChiDragon tdecimate '+' override - ChiDragon tdecimate problem with video section decimation in mode 5 (starting in version 0.9.12.7) - Asrial If there are any other items I've forgotten please let me know ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1027 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 220
|
Well, now that you mention other forgotten items, there's this old request, for an exclusion band for Tdecimate. Not really a "current issue" but it will certainly help people like me dealing with 30fps interlaced subtitles blended on top of 24fps hard-telecined material. Thanks
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1028 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MO, US
Posts: 999
|
An exclusion band in tdecimate could be accomplished by using the clip2 parameter:
mpeg2source() tfm() saved = last stackvertical(crop(),crop()) # set crops to remove lines containing subtitles tdecimate(clip2 = saved) In this case, tdecimate will calculate everything based on the input clip, but will output frames from clip2. The clip2 clip only has to have the same number of frames as the input. All other properties: height, width, and colorspace can be different. You could replace cropping/stackvertical with another method of removing the subtitles (set the subtitle area to black using overlay, etc...). It would be possible to add y0/y1 parameters to tdecimate and have it do the above internally, but I don't think it's worth it. Also, actually having y0/y1 parameters that are taken into account during metric calculation would be too much of a pain to add atm. However, it is on the list of things to add in the tdeint/tivtc rewrite. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1029 | Link | ||
Almost Silent Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Rethinking the "Why?" chromosome. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1030 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 14
|
How is one this SOURCE Deinterlacen?
I despair of it ![]() Sampler: http://rapidshare.com/files/31967235/Sampler.m2v.html http://simpleupload.net/download/88293/Sampler.m2v.html Thanks for your Help |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1031 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 864
|
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=125990
Maybe I should ask this here instead..... I'm trying to encode Pan's Labyrinth and MeGUI detects it as Partially Film (correct) with Top Field First. What's the difference between choosing TIVTC alone vs TIVTC+TDEINT? ![]() Last edited by JarrettH; 19th May 2007 at 05:06. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1032 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 600
|
TFM by default will use PP=6 which is motion-adaptive cubic interpolation on frames detected as combed. TFM+TDeint by default will use TDeint's different motion masking and kernel interpolation instead of cubic.
Maybe you should post of a sample of the unprocessed VOB in a section where you say TIVTC creates jerkiness. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1033 | Link | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 864
|
I think I figured it out. So apparently clicking analyze will make a different avs script than if I were to choose Partially Film + Top Field + TIVTC manually.
If I select myself: Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1036 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 600
|
@max24, except for 2 shots of the plane in the opening (before and after the kangaroo at the end), that is just plain old easy field shifting. Use "TFM()" or even "TFM(mode=0,PP=0)". The two plane shots mentioned have some duplicated fields which will cause the video to be a bit jerky there, but they're short sequences anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1038 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 864
|
It probably is, but I was bored and made some captures
![]() I think this movie only begins to have interlacing problems near the end. Three shots, one TIVTC alone the other TIVTC+TDEINT If anyone wants to compare: http://rapidshare.com/files/32249715...DEINT.rar.html Thanks! Last edited by JarrettH; 19th May 2007 at 22:15. Reason: added another shot from the end |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1040 | Link |
Angel of Night
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,562
|
I don't think the TFM clip2 parameter is working as it should. I've been using:
clipt=TDeint(field=1,emask=TMM(field=1),edeint=separatefields.selecteven.eedi2(field=1)) clipb=TDeint(field=0,emask=TMM(field=0),edeint=separatefields.selectodd.eedi2(field=0)) TFM(clip2=clipt,pp=4) But the frames I get back are exactly the same as with TFM(), and very different from clipt. I haven't had any luck figuring out why. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
tdeint, tivtc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|