View Single Post
Old 31st August 2005, 15:22   #8  |  Link
Manao
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
i didnt know what to expect from the ateme decoder and i also have to say i wasnt really positively surprised as it performed in the middle or slow
i have to note that ateme is working on a new decoder also supporting high profile, which i wasnt able to test, i hope they will also enhance decoding speed
for the main profile that are decoded by ffdshow / moonlight / nero / ateme, the average speeds are respectively 55.93, 61.94, 56.69 and 54.65. So indeed, moonlight is above the others, but the others rank the same.

Also, I wouldn't have used average speeds but, inverse of average of inverse speeds ( hence, the sum of decoding time ).

Finally, including mplayer is great for promotting mplayer ( or vlc, btw ), but serves no purposes in your comparison : you're comparing decoders, not players ( and -vo null is almost cheating if it does what I think )
__________________

Last edited by Manao; 31st August 2005 at 15:25.
Manao is offline   Reply With Quote