Quote:
Originally Posted by Didée
Oh yeah, TNLMeans ... one of the best unusable filters. Results after tweaking can be very good, but when using "good enough" settings, tweaking takes long, and encoding takes ages.
Feeding PAL 720x576: with the settings you posted, one frame takes me ~2 minutes to render (2.6 GHz singlecore). For a two hours movie, that would be ~250 days to encode. I'm tolerant against slow filtering, but too much is too much.
And when reducing the settings enough to get "competitive" speeds, the results are no more same.
@ Chainmax - didn't you forget to specify what material you're dealing with, what kind of noise there is, etc.? "Something that works as nice as FFT3DFilter" is a highly vague and nebulous question ...
|
doesn;t anyone read the thread title.
"Alternatives to FFT3DFilter for luma denoising on pictures?"
That means 1-speed is not important, and 2-no temporal processing; combined that means tnlmeans is the most optimal (can't say best) performing filter for removing uncorrelated noise irregardless of other factors.